Trent Telenko Profile picture
Dec 5 14 tweets 5 min read
The Drone Revolution in Military Affairs...visual proof...arriving.

Dyagilevo airfield, Russia - 2022

~600 km from Ukrainian border

h/t @wartranslated

1/
Khmeimim airbase, Syria - January 2018

2/
The common denominators here are smart people with cheap drones using global navigation satellite systems (GNSS).

They will absolutely kill unprotected aircraft without active electronic & anti-aircraft defenses designed to deal with attacking drones.

3/
defense-update.com/20180108_uav_a…
The only difference between the two events is that states with a computer adept STEM population & industry can build DIY assault drones/prop cruise missiles with 15 times the range of a non-state actor.

4/
A USMC air wing or the 101st Air Assault División's aviation brigade are in the same leaky boat.

The fundamental problem for Western military's is the lack of enough and appropriate air defense for expeditionary power projection against the assault drone threat to
5/
...their fuel.

Forward area refueling points and forward area operating bases necessary for US/Western style expeditionary warfare simply have no real air defenses commensurate with their value in the assault drone/prop cruise missile era.

5/
Air superiority with crewed jet fighters is simply inadequate with current generation air to air missiles.

Jet fighter munitions cost too much and are too few for the defensive counter-air mission against $20K to $90K each assault drones/prop cruise missiles.

6/
In a sense, we are coming full circle technologically to needing something like the F-89 Scorpion with an AESA radar, FLIR, laser designator & hoards of air-to-air 70 mm rockets in the APKWS class to deal with the assault drone threat in the expeditionary environment.
7/
To keep the flying hour costs low enough for the threat, this F-89ish plane is going to need to be uncrewed.

It is the five figure dollars per hour flight cost of 4th & 5th Gen jet fighters that prices them out of the defensive counter-air mission as much as the cost of their
8/
..air-to-air munitions.

Also, please note, no APKWS carrying capability on the F-35.

9/
21st century airpower is in a phase of rapid & disruptive technological innovation akin to the 1920's & 1930's with crewed jet fighters and bomber playing the role of the battleship to the aircraft carrier.

Crewed Jets aren't dead yet.

hbr.org/2015/12/what-i…
10/
Anymore than the battleship was obsolete in 1932.

Yet the same sort of advancing capability for the cost curve can be seen with drones versus jets today as happened 90 years ago.

11/
Today's drone boffins & wranglers have that same calculating "I can take you" glint in their eyes looking at the F-35 and the NGAD as US naval aviators flying torpedo planes and dive bombers in the 1930's had looking at battleships.

12/
And after Khmeimim, Engles & Dyagilevo airfields, can we really say those drone boffins & wranglers are wrong in the long run?

13/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

Dec 5
When I read this tweet.**

** "Revolution on Military Affairs" 🧵
1/
Making this tweet far more credible.

3/
Read 22 tweets
Dec 5
This is what attrition in war means.👇

The accumulation of small risks becomes a certainty of death after 10 months.

This "accumulation of small risks" reality is why the USAAF pilot tour in the South West Pacific was six months in WW2 from 1943 onwards.

1/6
Combat flying after six months in the SWPA wore down the pilots such that they became less effective and died rapidly after six months.

This effect is well known, so these KA-52 pilots were used to death by VKS leaders.

They should have been rotated to train new VKS pilots.
2/6
VKS leadership of the Putin Regime inability to do the right thing (pilot rotation) for the right reasons (to build a pipeline of trained replacement pilots) is why some Western 'experts' predictions of Russia eventually winning air superiority should be questioned.

3/6
Read 6 tweets
Dec 5
I've been asked several times for a summary thread of Truck logistics posts. This is it.

Please refrain from replying to it until the thread is complete.

1/
Read 52 tweets
Dec 1
This video is showing a Russian position recently taken by Ukraine. The video concentrates on the tracked vehicles.

There is a lot more there, if you look at the truck between them.

Russian fuel truck🧵
1/
This fuel truck.

2/
I've gone out of my way to make a big fat hairy deal about Russian fuel trucks for months.



3/
Read 22 tweets
Nov 26
This passage from the November 24th. Summary of Arestovych and Feygin daily broadcast by @wartranslated is a major development.

It represents the first real Russian attempt at "force regeneration" of skilled infantry in 8 months of war.

1/5
The problem with rotating these "Professional troops" is they have been used too long.

WW2 combat infantry men burned out after 180 days of combat (6 months).

Even with breaks after Kyiv, Russian "professionals" have been in combat about 7 months, thanks to the Kherson
2/5
...campaign.

These professionals, used as cadre with new recruits and enough time on the order of four months, can regenerate skilled Russian infantry formations.

The four months needed is as much about making the professionals with the "Thousand meter stare" back into

3/5
Read 5 tweets
Nov 23
This is another sub-tweet 🧵in response to one of mine on the difficulty of sanctions stopping commercial electronics from reaching Russia.

This line in the thread is killer:
"Trying to stop them getting out would be like trying to stop the flow of screwdrivers."

See👇
1/n
The difficulty of stopping the grey market electronic component trade to Russia doesn't mean it should not be tried.

It can and should be.

The issue is how difficult, costly, and unreliable sanctions can make the supply chain for Russian high tech weapons.

2/n
Production lines need parts at a rate that can support production.

Simply making it so that the full build of materials needed for a finished drone or missile are highly irregular in showing will have the same sort of effect as strategic bombing.

You reduce both the total
3/n
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(