The only difference between the two events is that states with a computer adept STEM population & industry can build DIY assault drones/prop cruise missiles with 15 times the range of a non-state actor.
4/
A USMC air wing or the 101st Air Assault División's aviation brigade are in the same leaky boat.
The fundamental problem for Western military's is the lack of enough and appropriate air defense for expeditionary power projection against the assault drone threat to 5/
...their fuel.
Forward area refueling points and forward area operating bases necessary for US/Western style expeditionary warfare simply have no real air defenses commensurate with their value in the assault drone/prop cruise missile era.
5/
Air superiority with crewed jet fighters is simply inadequate with current generation air to air missiles.
Jet fighter munitions cost too much and are too few for the defensive counter-air mission against $20K to $90K each assault drones/prop cruise missiles.
6/
In a sense, we are coming full circle technologically to needing something like the F-89 Scorpion with an AESA radar, FLIR, laser designator & hoards of air-to-air 70 mm rockets in the APKWS class to deal with the assault drone threat in the expeditionary environment. 7/
To keep the flying hour costs low enough for the threat, this F-89ish plane is going to need to be uncrewed.
It is the five figure dollars per hour flight cost of 4th & 5th Gen jet fighters that prices them out of the defensive counter-air mission as much as the cost of their
8/
..air-to-air munitions.
Also, please note, no APKWS carrying capability on the F-35.
9/
21st century airpower is in a phase of rapid & disruptive technological innovation akin to the 1920's & 1930's with crewed jet fighters and bomber playing the role of the battleship to the aircraft carrier.
Yet the same sort of advancing capability for the cost curve can be seen with drones versus jets today as happened 90 years ago.
11/
Today's drone boffins & wranglers have that same calculating "I can take you" glint in their eyes looking at the F-35 and the NGAD as US naval aviators flying torpedo planes and dive bombers in the 1930's had looking at battleships.
12/
And after Khmeimim, Engles & Dyagilevo airfields, can we really say those drone boffins & wranglers are wrong in the long run?
13/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Combat flying after six months in the SWPA wore down the pilots such that they became less effective and died rapidly after six months.
This effect is well known, so these KA-52 pilots were used to death by VKS leaders.
They should have been rotated to train new VKS pilots.
2/6
VKS leadership of the Putin Regime inability to do the right thing (pilot rotation) for the right reasons (to build a pipeline of trained replacement pilots) is why some Western 'experts' predictions of Russia eventually winning air superiority should be questioned.
3/6
The difficulty of stopping the grey market electronic component trade to Russia doesn't mean it should not be tried.
It can and should be.
The issue is how difficult, costly, and unreliable sanctions can make the supply chain for Russian high tech weapons.
2/n
Production lines need parts at a rate that can support production.
Simply making it so that the full build of materials needed for a finished drone or missile are highly irregular in showing will have the same sort of effect as strategic bombing.