In this thread on Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community contributions covered the role of Dr Ambedkar who belonged to the community in inserting Art 26 and explaining meaning of God in Constitutional Oath basis for Bharat:India2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
While Dr Ambedkar felt Art 32 was Atma of our Constitution resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute has shown that Art 26 is the Antaratma of our Constitution which was inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya with a key role played by Dr Ambedkar which is recorded
While Travancore Maharajas went to Shri Padmanabha Swamy temple daily to secure guidance of Ruler Deity to fulfill Thripadidanam obligation the same is achieved through Constitutional Oath which has been explained by Dr Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly
Thus while Art 26 preserves the Thrippadidanam obligation the Constitutional Oath preserves the requirement of seeking guidance of GOD and the newly discovered item is if the guidance is not followed Art 363 #Kantara dispute arises..Bharat:India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
26th number Paramatma Tatva
26th Article inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya with key contribution of Dr Ambedkar
26th Nov Constitution adopted
26th Jan Constitution in force
26th Dec #AyyappaJyothi
26th Feb key Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community letter on Art 363 #Kantara dispute resoln
Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has built on top of Dr Ambedkar's contribution who also belonged to the community to establish that Art 26 Antaratma of our Constitution controls Art 32 Atma of our Constitution through devotional efforts to resolve Art 363 #Kantara dispute
When @SwarajyaMag article was written Art 363 Hindu Deity Rights dispute was not resolved now we call this Art 363 #Kantara dispute and the resolution through divine grace and devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has enabled us to better understand Constitutional RamaRajya
One of the greatest speeches by any Hon'ble President explains the devotional Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community approach in the efforts to resolve Art 363 #Kantara dispute and why we seek Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji
If it had not been for the wrong opinion of officials dispute would have been resolved earlier by Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji without whose Tiruppan Alwar Ammal devotional efforts Art 363 #Kantara would never have been referred
To recognize &celebrate the devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in resolving Art 363 #Kantara dispute we demanded 1. Tiruppan Alwar statue 2. Nov 12th celebrated as Temple Entry Proclamation day 3. Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji
While many theories exist on how Bharat negotiated Covid far better than China more advanced Nation key role of Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji in ensuring we follow path of Dharma which helped secure divine help noted by Founders association cannot be forgotten
It is unfortunate officials did not cooperate with Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji's Tiruppan Alwar Ammal devotional efforts in resolving Art 363 #Kantara dispute but the fact remains is that the devotional efforts to keep us on the path of Dharma saved Nation
The suggestion based on data of how Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity protected Travancore Kingdom during last Spanish Flu pandemic and the need to secure His protection by following Dharma taken seriously by Hon'ble former President Shri Rama Nath Kovind ji when Covid started.
In spite of several obstacles created by officials in efforts for keeping Nation on the path of Dharma which enabled us to navigate Covid far better than China by securing divine help and efforts to resolve Art 363 #Kantara dispute Hon'ble former President deserves Bharat Ratna
The obsession to protect a wrong adharmik doctrine root cause for 👆 obstacles in the path of Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji has cost the Nation dearly hope it is given up now with the victory of dharma in Art 363 #Kantara dispute
In👇thread we explain how April 18th 2019 Sabarimala genuine promise blocked by officials 90% fulfilled by Shri Rama Om Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏 Himself...the defined promise for devout politicians for rest 10% work is same as Art 84(A) Constitutional Oath
Unfulfilled 10% Sabarimala promise is spirit of above Art 84 (A) Oath for all devout politicians across political spectrum who belong to Shri Rama Parivar Art 26 धार्मिक सम्प्रदाय (Hindi version of Constitution) Ramayana defn "राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
"If elected by grace of Shri Rama I will preserve protect and defend Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma definition of Constitutional Morality (Dharma) and ensure Sabarimala is reheard and correct Hon'ble SC Judges definition"
It is only through true faith and allegiance to Constitutional Morality (Dharma) definition of Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma as against wrong definition in SC ZERO Deity Rights judgement that Sovereignty and Integrity of Bharat can be secured
We have always wondered what is the significance of July 18th in the draft notification to resolve Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute...
Indian Independence Act came into force on July 18th 1947 and it is now clear the SC violated legal limit
Eka Shila Shri Chilkur Balaji SreeDevi Bhoomi Devi Swamyambhu Deity represents the natural Rama Rajya Sovereignty of Dharma right of this ancient sacred land worshipped in the form of Bhoomi Devi Deity and recognized as 👆 legal limit to Constituent Power of law making
Shri Thanthri Padmanabha Swamy temple explains the connection between Thrippadidanam and above legal limit to Constituent power of law making
Post Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathishta
Shri Ramlala Sarkar Art 26 & Art 363 Deity rights legal limit to Constituent Power of law making protects
Sabarimala Deity Right to be Worshipped inclusive of Devotees' Group Right to perform duty of worship & please Deity
HH Saantananda Maharshi Swamiji historic letter connects April 18th 2019 Sabarimala promise of Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji and Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathisha which fulfills it by grace of Guru even though wrong official opinion blocked it.
How Shri Rama Raja Deity of Orchha revealed Himself as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) when historic Digvijay yatra of Swamiji referred to in the above letter which started from Ayodhya turned back towards Ayodhya
Bharat : India 2.0 Art 26 interpretation (we hope to get SC to follow through Order 27A Rule 1) that protects Rama Rajya natural right of Bhumi Devi has been secured through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal (SC) community to which Milind Makwana belongs americankahani.com/perspectives/i…
"Our neighbors included a priest& Vedic astrologer. While both were members of what some would deem India’s “upper” or “dominant” castes, we were all in same socio-economic boat We didn’t think of them as superior nor did they think of us as inferior" Thank you for speaking truth twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We are proud of devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community without which Bharat would have lost Art 26 Rama Rajya protected in Deity Rights and we hope the Govt will respond to our request to honor Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community through Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
"Shri Parameshwarji Eklingji Maharaj is the Sovereign of Mewar, and Shriji as His sole representative shall exercise on His behalf all rights, authority & jurisdiction." From Mewar Constitution
Sovereignty of Dharma basic structure of Bharat Constitution
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan defining Bharat's Objectives resolution when we comp with Pakistan 👆
Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct