In this thread on Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community contributions covered the role of Dr Ambedkar who belonged to the community in inserting Art 26 and explaining meaning of God in Constitutional Oath basis for Bharat:India2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
While Dr Ambedkar felt Art 32 was Atma of our Constitution resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute has shown that Art 26 is the Antaratma of our Constitution which was inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya with a key role played by Dr Ambedkar which is recorded
While Travancore Maharajas went to Shri Padmanabha Swamy temple daily to secure guidance of Ruler Deity to fulfill Thripadidanam obligation the same is achieved through Constitutional Oath which has been explained by Dr Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly
Thus while Art 26 preserves the Thrippadidanam obligation the Constitutional Oath preserves the requirement of seeking guidance of GOD and the newly discovered item is if the guidance is not followed Art 363 #Kantara dispute arises..Bharat:India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
26th number Paramatma Tatva
26th Article inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya with key contribution of Dr Ambedkar
26th Nov Constitution adopted
26th Jan Constitution in force
26th Dec #AyyappaJyothi
26th Feb key Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community letter on Art 363 #Kantara dispute resoln
Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has built on top of Dr Ambedkar's contribution who also belonged to the community to establish that Art 26 Antaratma of our Constitution controls Art 32 Atma of our Constitution through devotional efforts to resolve Art 363 #Kantara dispute
When @SwarajyaMag article was written Art 363 Hindu Deity Rights dispute was not resolved now we call this Art 363 #Kantara dispute and the resolution through divine grace and devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has enabled us to better understand Constitutional RamaRajya
One of the greatest speeches by any Hon'ble President explains the devotional Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community approach in the efforts to resolve Art 363 #Kantara dispute and why we seek Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji
If it had not been for the wrong opinion of officials dispute would have been resolved earlier by Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji without whose Tiruppan Alwar Ammal devotional efforts Art 363 #Kantara would never have been referred
To recognize &celebrate the devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in resolving Art 363 #Kantara dispute we demanded 1. Tiruppan Alwar statue 2. Nov 12th celebrated as Temple Entry Proclamation day 3. Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji
While many theories exist on how Bharat negotiated Covid far better than China more advanced Nation key role of Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji in ensuring we follow path of Dharma which helped secure divine help noted by Founders association cannot be forgotten
It is unfortunate officials did not cooperate with Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji's Tiruppan Alwar Ammal devotional efforts in resolving Art 363 #Kantara dispute but the fact remains is that the devotional efforts to keep us on the path of Dharma saved Nation
The suggestion based on data of how Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity protected Travancore Kingdom during last Spanish Flu pandemic and the need to secure His protection by following Dharma taken seriously by Hon'ble former President Shri Rama Nath Kovind ji when Covid started.
In spite of several obstacles created by officials in efforts for keeping Nation on the path of Dharma which enabled us to navigate Covid far better than China by securing divine help and efforts to resolve Art 363 #Kantara dispute Hon'ble former President deserves Bharat Ratna
The obsession to protect a wrong adharmik doctrine root cause for 👆 obstacles in the path of Hon'ble former President Shri Ram Nath Kovind ji has cost the Nation dearly hope it is given up now with the victory of dharma in Art 363 #Kantara dispute
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
A Picture is worth a thousands words true 👆
But it does not govern the interpretation of our constitution by SC
So there is a need to translate it into words
Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has done this great devotional service to our Nation Bharat
What the Rama Rajya picture conveys is present in Ramayana in the words of Bharata
Shri Marthandavarma made this definition of spiritual property of Shri Rama with minor change into a legal definition that can be asserted in Court through deed of dedication of Travancore Kingdom
"..right of the deity to follow His Dharma flows from Article 25(1) and Article 26 of the Constitution." When argument rejected by SC
Shri Rama Raja have linked यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem with right u Art 26 read w Art 363 & Art 372 through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution
Thread describes how victory of dharma achieved in Art 363 #Kantara dispute through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
Shri Rama Raja of Constitution has used the argument of the State agreed to by Judiciary that agreement between British Queen and Prince of Arcot continues to be in force u Art 372 to good effect to enforce Thrippadidanam obligation inherited by SC which is also in its emblem 👆
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
Bharatha's definition of property in Ramayana with slight modification became legally valid through deed of dedication of Marthandavarma and applying SC Ayodhya judgement along with Ruler Deity status u Art 363 securing Part III rights and definition of law as Dharma by Rajaji👆
Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution has established
Travancore Constitutional Rama Rajya as defined above thus continues to be in force
The correct interpretation of our Constitution👇thru resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute secured by devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community highlighting constitutional dharmik duty of SC in our Bharat : India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
SC has inherited Constitutional Thrippadidanam obligation is how we understand Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution and explained in 👇 thread and how the Oath binds Hon'ble SC Judges as explained by Dr Ambedkar in Constituent assembly in context of Art 60
Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution converts the moral obligation of Oath of Hon'ble SC Judges as explained by Dr Ambedkar when violated then Shri Rama Raja God of our Constitution can raise Art 363 dispute to ensure dharmik guidance which Hon'ble SC Judges Oath binds is followed
"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect
Chilkur Balaji Temple has been ground zero for both resistance against draconian 30/87 Endowments Act and also Sabarimala judgement conclusion that Deities have ZERO rights resulting in Art 363 #Kantara dispute.
Hon'ble late Justice Rama Jois' foreword and above resoln of dispute
How यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in SC emblem is part of Deity Rights and Constitutional Rama Rajya is now explained through Art 363 #Kantara dispute resolution hope SC will do its constitutional duty and ensure principles of Dharma are followed in pending cases
The resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute which established that principles of Travancore Constitutional Rama Rajya continues to be in force in view of merger promise also establishes above constitutional mandate of the Deity also in force in Art 26
In addition to the points made in the important programe it is now time to implement the constitutional mandate of Deity esp after resolution of Art 363 #Kantara dispute which continues to be in force and is not in favor of Govt control of Hindu Temples