As always, given complexities with early v in-person votes and geographic variation in partisan loyalty, best to wait for a representative set of each to report before drawing conclusions about these GA numbers. Warnock up big in early vote ≠ victory
For example, the raw partisan split of early votes in Fulton County look a few points better for Warnock than a benchmark for a tied race. But without knowing the election-day numbers in rural areas or urban Atlanta, that’s not enough to make any calls
We have one fully reporting county and the result is exactly in line with Nov’s results — which would be a Warnock win if it holds everywhere else
I bet the needle starts out at D+1
i’m sorry, but if we know this is mostly early vote, why tweet out the county numbers at all?
Everything in GA so far is consistent with nearly complete stasis (in partisan outcome) since Nov — ie, D+1. That’s a good prior but lots left to count!
see?
this is going to be a close election, and a long night of counting. but one way to gauge uncertainty is to ask how counties coming in every ~20m compare to predictions based on previously reporting counties. and so far everything keeps coming in on updated benchmarks around D+1
this is where the uncertainty is IMO. the small sample size of very Dem counties show sharper dropoffs in turnout than very Rep counties. if you think that holds, Walker pulls this off. but if you think Atlanta is different, then Warnock is up.
or you could wait for the count!
My guess is that people will start calling this as soon as precincts in and around Atlanta start submitting final tallies. The rest of the state is telling a story that is remarkably consistent with Nov’s D+1 outcome. (Assuming, that is, those counties match the benchmarks.)
blue (but small) randolph county came in 4 points more democratic than Nov with an equal decrease in turnout to redder districts. i reckon that moved the live models to expect a better warnock performance in atlanta, and a big swing in odds to the left. outcomes converging?
walker is running out of time for things to turn in his favor. every county now seems to grow warnock’s lead in the models
Pattern so far is Walker hitting benchmarks in rural areas but falling short in cities and larger counties. Eg, Glynn, Thomas, Baldwin, and Tift are all more Democratic relative to Nov. If that is a hint at what happens in urban counties this is coming up Warnock
Trigger-happy posters might start tweeting that Warnock is the projected winner. That’s fine and might even be a good call! But if you want higher odds you have to wait for Atlanta. By nature surprises tend to hide where we least expect them…
Yes BUT turnout is down more than in other counties — potentially a mirror image to regional drop off in turnout from 2020 to 2021, if other counties follow suit
If this is real and not a data error I have to imagine that’s almost all the models need to converge on a Warnock win
the NYT needle appears to be dead for now, but the WaPo model from @lennybronner and co has seemingly converged on a very very likely Warnock win washingtonpost.com/election-resul…
Current patterns indicate Raphael Warnock will net at least 200k more votes from the major Atlanta counties, if patterns hold (note “IF” here—there is some uncertainty, though IMO not much) which would put him in a commanding lead over Herschel Walker after all votes are counted
Surely the result in Athens (3 points more D in vote margin, turnout down 8%) will convince those who are uncertain about Warnock’s lead
here’s the big picture right now:
- turnout in blue counties is higher than turnout in red counties, relative to Nov
- votes in fully reporting counties are on average 1 pt more dem than in nov
- there are >200k more net Warnock votes outstanding in/around Atlanta

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with G. Elliott Morris

G. Elliott Morris Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gelliottmorris

Dec 6
If I had to bet I’d say Warnock has the clear advantage going into tonight’s GA Senate runoff, but that the markets are a bit overconfident on him based on publicly available data. A +2 lead in Senate polls is roughly a 65/35 chance for the leading candidate. Long way from 100
Plenty of other indicators are bullish for Warnock. The same GE fundamentals (fundraising, candidate quality, incumbency) all suggest he ought to have an edge, & we may see the same patterns of GOP voter drop off as in the 2021 runoff. In fact I think that’s likelier than not!
Another wonky theory: One tricky thing for the GOP is that because education and turnout are correlated, as education polarization increases the expected number of R votes shrinks as you decrease the turnout of the electorate, all else being equal. Would help Ds today (in theory)
Read 6 tweets
Nov 17
trafalgar group has the highest empirical bias relative to other pollster of over 500 firms we have data from. literally the most biased pollster in america. and we warned people that that bias could carry forward and mess with averages in a good year for polls. we were right!!
if someone has a bad record, is opaque about their methods and then tells you they “want to be the elon musk of” that thing, that’s a 🚩 🚩
FWIW i think rob cahaly’s explanation is probably wrong. it’s at least as plausible IMO that his heavily R-leaning stratified sample is at fault. but the point is really that there’s no way to know unless he provides methods details about how this stuff works — and he doesn’t!
Read 6 tweets
Nov 11
Looking at these newest Senate results and tbh if I’m a news network decision desk, I’m probably getting pretty close to calling AZ for the Dems
and honestly NV is looking good too, but it’s a lot closer and we don’t have super reliable data on the number of outstanding ballots in the counties around Las Vegas and Reno
If I'm doing my math right, if this keeps up (and depending on Clark tallies) CCM will win by a little under 2 points
Read 4 tweets
Nov 10
Polls just had one of their best elections ever. Based on our (preliminary) estimates, our averages in competitive states have an absolute error of just 2 points on margin — a little under half the expected error — with average *bias* undershooting Dems.

economist.com/united-states/…
This chart shows bias in each state in 2022 vs 2020. Take out FL and there is a uniform decrease in bias across states. Good!
Though if you're looking for reasons to be anxious: much like 2018 there is still a positive slope here, indicating *some* persistent partisan nonresponse
In competitive Senate races with more than 2 polls, this is the second-best performance for pollsters since 1998
Read 4 tweets
Nov 10
this is a completely useless exercise if you’re not imputing results in uncontested seats. you do not capture structural advantages when aggregate totals are missing like 50 seat observations!
One issue is that the popular vote is much likelier to end up < R+1 than at R+2 or more. See here
Another error is that you can’t use House election results to write about structural advantages because there is so much else going on in the vote totals (even if you impute uncontested seats) that is not about *structure*.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 30
If you adjust for the percent of votes outstanding in each state in Brazil right now*, you get a result of 50.1 Lula - 49.9 Bolsonaro --
which is to say, it looks like Lula could still pull this off, but it's going to be another close round!
The * here is that doing this assumes that state voting patterns will be constant as new votes come in, which is not true. So it's an estimate with a wide margin of error!
Now getting closer to a 1-pt victory for Lula. (I don't have precinct-level results but if you did the same thing at that level, I'm sure you'd get a different result)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(