Larry Sanger Profile picture
Dec 7, 2022 7 tweets 8 min read Read on X
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales Hey @elonmusk, I am “the other” co-founder of Wikipedia. The ex-founder, I like to say. I actually pushed and led the idea of a wiki encyclopedia in the project’s seminal first year. Read what I wrote about why neutrality is so important here: larrysanger.org/2022/03/why-ne…
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales Wikipedia is another example of oppressive Internet centralization. The solution is to build on a new, open standard for encyclopedias: the ZWI file format and the #encyclosphere. See EncycloReader.org and EncycloSearch.org aim to bring together all the encyclopedias.
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales The files, the file format, the network, the software—it’s all free. Please ask your many followers to support the 501(c)(3) Knowledge Standards Foundation: mightycause.com/organization/K…

Follow @ks_found
Join our mailing list: encycloaphere.org
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales @ks_found We have exciting things in the works. My son (an awesome dev) has built a Chromium plugin that appends encyclosphere search results to Goo and DDG, fetches the articles via WebTorrent, and seeds articles for other users in idle tabs. Truly decentralized.

Launching this month.
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales @ks_found We have a $100K matching grant this year from FUTO.org (which I’m sure is on your radar; if not, it should be).

We’re making a Yacy-powered encyclopedia meta-search engine.
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales @ks_found We’re bringing public domain encyclopedias into the encyclosphere, not just as PDFs—we’re doing the work of extracting individual articles and making them into ZWI files anybody can use.

We’ll have millions of articles from dozens (100s?) of encyclopedias within a few months.
@elonmusk @stillgray @jimmy_wales @ks_found Unlike the Wikimedia Foundation, we actually need donations, to build stuff that doesn’t exist yet, tech that liberates and preserves uncensorable knowledge for future generations.

BTW this includes a WordPress plugin that allows people to push articles to the encyclosphere…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Larry Sanger

Larry Sanger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lsanger

Apr 18
More evidence that the push for censorship and thought control on Wikipedia went right up to the top.

Appalling. Even ten years ago, a CEO of a free information organization saying this sort of thing in America would have been basically unthinkable. How far we have fallen.
Wikipedia is badly biased
larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipe…
Wikipedia is more one-sided than ever
larrysanger.org/2021/06/wikipe…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 20
The man there with the future king gave to hospitals so he could rape children in the hospitals.

He had a group of people he literally did Satanic rituals with.

He copulated with corpses.

The king of England was pals with a demon.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Satanic ritual abuse—this is far from the only report about his horrifyingly demonic practices.

We’re supposed to believe the king knew nothing of this.

scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/uk-news/j…
I guess this is common knowledge by now. Yet, for some reason, we pretend it isn’t part of our reality. As horrifying as it is, it is good and necessary that we will be reminded from time to time.
Read 6 tweets
Nov 22, 2023
Imagine the amount of specialized knowledge it requires to deal intelligently with all the problems of a 21st century megastate, from foreign policy, to finance, business, and economics, to every aspect of American society.

This is important. 👇
Call them "bureaucrats," but they include the Joint Chiefs, deep CIA, FBI, and NSA insiders, the extremely sophisticated diplomatic corps, the Fed Board, DoE nuclear security officials, etc., etc.

The Deep State, right?
Those people represent a massive and slow-changing center of power. The same goes for the party apparatus of the Republicans and Democrats. Those people are extremely powerful. And I'm not talking about elected officials.
Read 10 tweets
Oct 30, 2023
@21WIRE @elonmusk Any rising (or new and already dominant) system will be carefully studied and ruthlessly gamed. Anyone who has watched the development of different social media systems knows this. There are people who make their careers in PR and intelligence on this. @TYonClubhouse
@21WIRE @elonmusk @TYonClubhouse Remember too how closely Twitter worked with spy agencies. Why suppose this has changed? Are we just going to *trust* that, when it matters to the Establishment, they will always allow facts to be endorsed by this system? 🤔
@21WIRE @elonmusk @TYonClubhouse I don’t suppose that *anyone* centrally controls how very large blocs of Community Notes all vote? 🤔

Nah! That would be dishonest!
Read 4 tweets
May 22, 2023
Twitter HQ, Oct. 2022—

Musk: There’s a new plan to increase revenue. We charge $8/month for blue checks.

Investor: Sorry, but that’s ridiculous. Nobody will pay that.

Musk: Oh? But you forget, conservatives think I’m one of them. $8/month to support the cause! Own the libs!
👇
Emp.: But then you alienate all the liberal A-listers who gave the blue check its cachet in the first place.

Musk: Temporarily. In 2023 we hire a new liberal CEO who resumes the crackdown on misinformation.

Inv.: Well, then you’ll lose all the conservatives!

👇
Musk: No, that’s not how this works. The real functional effect of the blue check is to boost visibility. That’s the only thing that matters. After months of enjoying higher visibility, conservatives will stay on board just not to be suppressed.

Inv.: Gosh. Diabolical!

👇
Read 5 tweets
May 19, 2023
I might be wrong that transgenderism is just a dangerous fad.

Thread:
Many people who seriously think they are the caring, decent, loving ones—not ironically, but really and truly—go to schools and churches where gender will be optional and trans kids are normal and everywhere.
They will BE the Establishment. They know they’re liberal, but also they’re the normal smart people.

To them, the weirdos who reject transgenderism will increasingly look like the racists of the 50s and the homophobes of 80s: embarrassing at best, just plain evil at worst.
You (my regular followers) and I know there is a massive difference between loving your black brothers and sisters as equals, on the one hand, and indulging what turns out to be a pathological sexual fetish, on the other.

But the Establishment normies don’t know this. At all.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(