1. Full control of committees: This means we no longer have to split membership with Republicans, who could force time consuming discharge petition votes if they deadlock on nominees. They could even block nominees by boycotting a committee.
1/
2. Subpoena power: Previously, Republicans could block committees from issuing subpoenas because of the split membership. Now Democrats can investigate who they want, with full subpoena power. 3. Absences: 2 Dems can be out and we can still pass a party line vote.
2/
4. Protect against a rogue senator: while Manchin and Sinema have been generally supportive on nominees, we now don't have to worry about one of them, or anyone other Dem, going rogue sinking a nominee by themselves. We can get a little more aggressive with nominees.
3/
5. Sets up for the future: Warnock will serve a 6 year term. He not only helps with this Senate majority, but gives us better chances in 2024 and 2026 as well. 6. Saves everyone from 6 years of having to cringe at the things Herschel Walker says: and now that's priceless.
4/4
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When he tweeted this, the needle had Warnock as a 58% chance and the projected margin as Warnock 0.8%. 15 minutes later it jumped to 71% chance for Warnock with a D +1.8 projected margin.
Here's why 51 is much better than 50, even if we don't keep the House. And no, it's not (mostly), about Manchin and Sinema.
Right now, with a tied Senate, we govern with a power share agreement, where Republicans get an equal split with Democrats on committee membership 1/
This gives them a lot of power to mess things up, because they can do 2 things:
1. With a tied vote in committee, they can force a discharge petition, which is an extra vote that takes up floor time. 2. Go nuclear, and boycott committees, preventing votes from happening.
2/
Number 2 isn't theoretical. They have done it a couple of times this Congress, including to block a Fed pick. They would absolutely use it again in a major situation (such as to prevent an SC replacement for a Conservative judge).
THREAD: 100+ major accomplishments of President Biden and Democrats:
1. Created 10.3 million jobs in 21 months 2. Passed $1400 checks, expanded UI benefits, and expanded child tax credit to recover from the pandemic 3. Expanded the ACA to cover more people and cut premiums
1/
4. 640 million COVID vaccines administered and over 650 million donated globally 5. 24 free COVID tests per family by mail, and required insurance to provide 8 free tests per person per month 6. Expanded Medicaid eligibility post-partum from 60 days to 1 year.
2/
7. Gave Medicare the right to negotiate prescription drug prices 8. Capped Medicare out of pocket prescription drug costs at $2000 per year, and capped insulin copays at $35 a month 9. Required Medicare to cover all recommended vaccines with no copay.
3/
Forcing a "peace" settlement of the war that allows Russia to hold on to Ukrainian territory is the pro-war position, not the anti-war one. Because it will prove Putin right. It will show him that the West is weak willed. That Democracies talk big but wilt under pressure. 1/
And that Russians can suffer and outlast us. And he'll regroup. And he'll rebuild his army. And then he'll come back for all of Ukraine. And Moldova. And Georgia. And every non-NATO old Soviet Republic. And he'll threaten nukes every time. But then he'll start thinking 2/
How solid is Article 5, really? All the West does is talk, talk, talk. Are they really going to be willing to die for a piece of paper? Then he'll move on Poland, and Estonia, and Latvia, and all the old Soviet NATO Republics. Using scores of conquered people as cannon fodder 3/
I'll try to answer this as the more general "why doesn't the US give X", and it's not about why the US does or doesn't choose to give a separate thing, but all the considerations that have to be undertaken when deciding what military assistance to give to Ukraine and when 1/
The first thing everyone needs to understand is that the President doesn't have unlimited authority to transfer whatever he wants. He has a specific budgeted authority provided to him by Congress. Even old items not in use have a value. Plus the cost of transfer, training, etc 2/
All have to be factored in. As does the cost of upkeep and continued ammunition supplies. Once President Biden hits the limit, he has to ask Congress for more money. Even though the American people support Ukraine, continually requesting funding for them, while things here 3/