Thread by @csranga

Picture Translated

"राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
We The People & Bharat(inclusive of all living beings) belong to Shri Rama & His property law in Art 26 (d) when property defined 👆takes color of Dharma & duty of SC with यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः in emblem to protect

A Picture is worth a thousands words true 👆

But it does not govern the interpretation of our constitution by SC

So there is a need to translate it into words

Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has done this great devotional service to our Nation Bharat

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1600083454565052416

What the Rama Rajya picture conveys is present in Ramayana in the words of Bharata
Shri Marthandavarma made this definition of spiritual property of Shri Rama with minor change into a legal definition that can be asserted in Court through deed of dedication of Travancore Kingdom

Rajaji explained the meaning of Dharma as law

Dr Ambedkar who belongs to Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community helped word Art 26 in the current form inserted by Kanchi Paramacharya

Judiciary and our Law officers have said that the agreement between British Queen and Prince of Arcot has force of law under Art 372 and thus above defn of spiritual property from deed of dedication of Travancore Kingdom has the force of law under Art 372

They cannot apply one yardstick for Prince of Arcot and another one for Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity so the definition of Spiritual property & obligation of Dharma continues to be in force is how we understand the proclamation with consent of Deity

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1595780418368045058

On Feb 10th 2020 SC Nine Judges Bench violated the Dharma of Judges which is to listen to voice of Dharma that they were bound by Oath to do as explained by Dr Ambedkar belonging to Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in Constituent Assembly when Shri Chilkur Balaji petition rejected

On Feb 10th 2020 not only Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity petition but petitions of Shirur Mutt and Thanthri Shri Padmanabha Swamy Temple was also rejected together and what they had to say in combination was crucial for interpretation of our Constitution and correct Sabarimala

It turns out that the obligation of Oath of Hon'ble Judges of SC to listen to Voice of Dharma is not just a moral obligation as explained by Dr Ambedkar in Constituent Assembly in context of Art 60 Oath meaning of GOD it can be legally enforceable as well by GOD Shri Rama Raja

Such an intricate legal concept can now be understood by large section of devotees of Shri Rama Raja of Constitution thanks to #Kantara movie as to why SC Nine Judge Bench did not move an inch after above adharma in court &Art 363 dispute raised to correct

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1595958761025597440

That Adharma was committed on Feb 10th 2020 by SC Nine Judges Bench explained by the association of Shebaits of many Deities

Shri Rama Raja of Constitution asserted His constitutional right to be heard on the interpretation of Constitution by SC and further proceedings stopped and Art 363 #Kantara dispute raised and resolved through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1600079308210388994

Art 363 #Kantara dispute got support of Tiruppan Alwar community, ancient Mathas, two Retd Judges of HC , Hon'ble MPs, former Chief Secretary eminent devotees organizations but officials gave wrong opinion to Hon'ble former President blocking notification

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1548132911643123718

Shri Rama Raja of Constitution secured victory of dharma victory of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in Art 363 #Kantara dispute overcoming all obstacles and completed His 15000 Kms Shri Rama Digvijay Yatra of His Religious Endowment as defined above.

Slowly but surely real devotees of Shri Rama Raja of Constitution are understanding the extraordinary victory secured in Art 363 #Kantara dispute and except the few who latch on to flawed constitutional morality doctrine of Sabarimala many celebrating.

https://twitter.com/csranga/status/1600107967889625091

What will happen if SC interpretative power is used to create a new doctrine and also made basic structure against principles of Dharma ? Even Parliament cannot change. This is also answered by Shri Rama Raja of Constitution by asserting the lakshman rekha under Art 363

Dear Devotees let us ignore the minority who are not real devotees of Shri Rama Raja of Constitution who cannot recognize victory of dharma victory of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community certified by Hon'ble former Chief Justice Venkatachaliah ji whose guidance secured victory

The people whose devotion to the dangerous constitutional morality doctrine of Sabarimala is much higher than their devotion to Shri Rama Raja of Constitution will never accept victory of dharma in Art 363 #Kantara dispute.

swarajyamag.com/blogs/why-rama…

The rest of us who are real devotees of Shri Rama Raja of Constitution let us celebrate this great victory of dharma victory of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in Art 363 #Kantara dispute in securing us great constitutional interpretation that could only be dreamed about so far.

The SC is a great institution & sure that once Hon'ble Judges understand the error made as explained by Shri Rama Raja of Constitution they will correct themselves. Our duty is to explain to the Court the victory of dharma secured in Art 363 #Kantara dispute let us do our dharma

When the time comes the people whose devotion to Constitutional Morality doctrine of Sabarimala is higher than devotion to Shri Rama Raja of Constitution can also argue their view before SC and let Dharma prevail in this matter. Both views will have to be heard has been ensured.

The adharma of Feb 10th 2020 has been corrected so that both sides one whose devotion to Constitutional Morality doctrine of Sabarimala is higher than devotion to Shri Rama Raja and the other side whose devotion to Shri Rama Raja is non-negotiable will now have their say in SC.

Having secured Shri Rama Banam interpretation the real devotees of Shri Rama Raja of Constitution are ready for the Battle of Dharma of Kurukshetra between the two sides as defined above before SC Nine Judge bench whenever Shri Rama Raja decides to restart the proceedings