The age old question we ask ourselves with a yield protocol is:
1οΈβ£ Where is the yield coming from?
2οΈβ£ Is it sustainable?
In an attempt to answer those questions, I had to dig a bit deeper than my previous thread.
Let's begin β
1οΈβ£ Where is the yield coming from?
From two sources:
1. #AMPLIFI emissions which cannot be sold until the lock is over
2. $ETH yield (yield amplification)
Only those with their amplifiers fused receive the extra $ETH yield, as a reward for locking their funds.
1. #AMPLIFI emissions are produced infinitely, but remember we burnt 20 #AMPLIFI to start producing that yield in the first place.
This makes up the base yield assigned to each Amplifier.
This #AMPLIFI is constantly accrued, but only unlocked once the fuse is complete.
2. Yield amplification accounts for the bonus APR we see for fused amplifiers
Rewarded for their lock, the ETH rewards comes from validators and is collected as if it's protocol trading fees
The APRs are constantly subject to change, with rewards being distributed every 30 days
2οΈβ£ Is it sustainable?
Sustainability is essentially as important as where the yield comes from, which is why @AmpliFiDeFi have introduced a plethora of deflationary mechanics.
Why?
Because each fused Amplifier grants #AMPLIFI rewards, it's necessary to control token supply.
β’ Long liquidity & reward lock to ensure stable emissions
β’ Claim frequency penalty which creates a finite useful lifespan for each Amplifier
They double as revenue:
When I'm talking about 'claims', I'm mentioning their governance token, gAMP, which is accrued daily.
Amplifiers which are locked for 1-5 years receive $ETH rewards from:
β’ Trade fees
β’ ETH staking
Redeem your gAMP right before the monthly snapshot to maximize ETH rewards.
The analogy the team use to describe an AMPLIFIERS sustainability is similar to renting out a car.
After you pay for the car, it's new and you can rent it for top dollar.
The more miles you put on it, the less demand there is, until it's eventually retired.
The reason I harp on about their claim frequency delay is because native token emissions are essential to @AmpliFiDeFi, but also incredibly hard to get right.
The more you incentivize long-term holders and infrequent claims, the easier it is for the protocol to grow.
So do you think I summarized it well enough to convict you?
I still maintain my conviction from my previous thread:
A crypto project will inevitably get annuities right, and it might just be @AmpliFiDeFi.
Understanding the importance of revenue streams & fee distribution for large and small perpetuals.
𧡠π
When we think of perpetual DEXs and how they generate fees, we make the assumption that almost all fees should come via trading.
However, a perp. DEX is much more than that. Swaps, Arbitrage, and perps create a broader fee generator model for the platform.
$MVX is an example.
$MVX is a perp. DEX on Polygon, you can read more about them in the thread below.
The reason I constantly use them as an example is because they're situated between other perps their size, like $UNIDX and upcoming $DXP, but they are not $GMX or $GNS.