Again, Tate is gross but he has an audience for a reason and the worst thing you could do is make him more dangerous and forbidden
The way to deal with Tate is to make him irrelevant by providing such a strong alternative that no one would bother with him
If you find that your movement is unable to provide a strong and compelling vision of masculinity because it is too afraid of offending the wrong people then you shouldn't be surprised when a guy like Tate comes around to fill that void
The idea that morality is a purely rational endeavor has all kinds of disastrous consequences
Not the least of which is that the left has given birth to the IQ maximalists who they absolutely cannot handle because it’s just the logical conclusion of their own ideology
If good and evil are functions of intelligence, and intelligence is a largely measurable and heritable trait, than biological determinism defines morality
This is why leftists scream bloody murder if someone brings up race and IQ
I love this meme because it displays the stupidity required to conclude that mass immigration is only a "consensual" exchange between a corporation and foreign labor
Samuel Huntington prophetically claimed that the question of this century would be "Who are we?"
The debate over what a nation is and who is an American will continue to haunt every political issue until it is settled 🧵/1
This question isn't going away and panicked conservatives spouting platitudes about the founding fathers while trying to cancel anyone who actually repeats what the founders said won't make it go away
If conservatives refuse to participate it will simply be had without them /2
Progressives have used "identity politics" to divide and destroy the US and we are all understandably weary of their tactics
But all politics is at some level identity politics, and if we ignore identity entirely we attempt to abandon the political, which means losing /3
For good or ill vital nations impose their will and their way of being on other peoples
The expansion brings greatness and builds empires, but it inevitably invites interference by foreign interests (figures as diverse as Washington and Machiavelli warn about this) 1/🧵
Greatness brings material prosperity which inevitably brings decadence
The Spartans famously kept their population poor to avoid this, but they also never built a flourishing empire which meant they lost the civilizational arms race of scale 2/
Overconfident and decadent rulers believe they can use foreign interests to win the internal domestic power struggle, assuming the foreigners can always be discarded
They lose any sense of nation identity or loyalty and they see the common people as a danger to their rule 3/
The level of incompetence in the Harris campaign makes it difficult to judge how possible this really is
Yes, she’s failing horribly with men and Rogan has a huge male audience but Harris also has a record of embarrassing herself in any interview that lasts more that 15 minutes
Rogan goes at least 3 hours, he’s not exactly a hard hitting interviewer but he isn’t going to spoon feed her like most of the mainstream
Italian seems very unlikely that he’d heavily edit to protect her like CBS
I get that an air of desperation has settled on the Harris camp but it would be campaign malpractice to put such a weak candidate into a situation like that
Just do friendly press and hope that hatred for Trump and ballot harvesting pushes her over the finish line