I am more than delighted that my paper "German gays go green? Voting behaviour of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals in the 2021 German federal election” has now been published in Electoral Studies @ElectoralStdies. #LGB #LGBTQ #GermanPolitics @QueerSeminar
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
While it has been argued that LGB individuals vote for parties of the political left as they represent most of the core values that are meaningful to LGBs, we were mainly relying on assumptions that it is the case. This paper now provides some more evidence.
First, data from Aug 2021 show that - similar to studies from the US, UK & Canada - an affinity of LGB individuals for left-wing parties also exists in Germany. The German Greens & Left in particular disproportionately benefit. CDU/CSU & SPD are underrepresented. What mechanisms
play a role here? 1) the likelihood of identifying with the Greens increases by 11.26% among LGB individuals - compared to heterosexuals. For comparison: church membership increases identific. with the CDU/CSU on average by 10.6%,
trade union membership increases identific. with the SPD by 9.08%. At the same time, a corresponding identific. with the left increases by 4.25% for LGBs. For both parties, however, if PID is then included as an indep. predictor, no sexuality-related direct effect can be found.
But why?Using path models, it turns out that self-ID. as LGB leads to feeling socio-culturally closer to the Greens, which then has an effect on party identification. At the same time, LGB Self-ID also leads to a higher level of identification with the Greens.
This identification with the Greens then influences voting behaviour in favour of the party. With the Left, on the other hand, there is only the connection: sexuality - socio-cultural proximity - PID - vote.
While I could not observe any effect of sexuality on a PID with the AfD, there is a small effect of self-identifying as LGB on voting for the radical-right AfD. Why this might be the case can be read in the paper ;-)
Many thanks to the participants of the workshop on "Sexuality and political participation: expanding methodological and empirical frontiers" at the @ECPR Joint Sessions 2022 for their feedback.
In particular, I thank @turnbulldugarte for re-reading & commenting on the paper revised after the conference! My thanks also go to the reviewers for helpful comments and to my colleague and friend @jpthomeczek for his encouragement to write this paper.
If you would like to have a copy of the article, feel free to send me a mail or message me with your email address. Thank you very much for reading this thread :-D

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Constantin Wurthmann (@cw_powi@mastodon.social)

Constantin Wurthmann (@cw_powi@mastodon.social) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CW_PoWi

Sep 30, 2021
Carlo Masala hat hier Recht. Die CDU/CSU kann bei der AfD nichts gewinnen, konnte bei ihr nichts gewinnen und wird bei ihr nichts gewinnen. Ich bin es leid, dass die gesamtdeutsche Wahlforschung das immer wieder sagt, ihr aber keine Beachtung geschenkt wird. Unfassbar.
Menschen wie Philipp Amthor geht es aber auch gar nicht mehr um den Inhalt oder die Sache. Es ist die schnöde Profilierung GEGEN wissenschaftliche Fakten. Wir können Threads und Analysen, Paper und Bücher schreiben, so viele wir wollen, Amthor & co. wissen es immer (!) besser.
Das muss man auch gar nicht mehr weiter kommentieren. Also ich hab's ja jetzt schon oft gehört, dass man mir riet "ich solle doch mal mit den Leuten vor Ort reden, die sagen dann, wie es richtig ist". Ja gut, wenn das die Argumente gegen wissenschaftliche Fakten sind.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(