Note that:
1. This was (from memory) the first Q in a long list of Qs - it would be interesting to have information on the drop-out rate.
2. Even this Q while far less leading than those later implies an argument against the stadium (cost) and is not balanced.
#politas
1. This was (from memory) the first Q in a long list of Qs - it would be interesting to have information on the drop-out rate.
2. Even this Q while far less leading than those later implies an argument against the stadium (cost) and is not balanced.
#politas
https://twitter.com/swegen31/status/1601085066482155520
This too. By saying "Liberal" you may attract a result contaminated by partisan views. "Tasmanian Government" would be perfectly sufficient if you needed to mention the government at all (I'm not even sure you do). #pollshapedobject
https://twitter.com/EthanOfHouseK/status/1601096448258764800
It reminds me of the same polling cycles Tasmania had forever with issues like the pulp mill and old growth logging where there were dozens of polls supposed to show public opposition and almost none of them were soundly designed.
I never understand this behaviour. If you're confident the public agree with you and that dubious wording makes little difference then a neutrally designed question should make your poll far less open to complaints at the cost of only a few percent of support for your side.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
