The small mindedness of the Soviet-style left who are so insecure in their own convictions that they use government to suppress dissent shows they either can’t, or they feel above, debate.
The left conspired to do this after conservatives became successful in narrative disruption and outreach during the pre-tea party #Dontgo and during the tea party 2.0 itself. That is when things began to change.
And a lot more people were affected by this than just four.
More here. I started watching it because it amused me to regularly lose what started as thousands then hundreds of thousands of followers regularly, almost like clockwork. And then I kept having to refollow people like my husband. From 4/21 danaloesch.substack.com/p/big-tech-hat…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you disagree with something then just disagree with it — WITHOUT trying to BS about ballistics or firearm function despite knowing nothing about either. More zeal than knowledge here is callous.
He goes on about deer — but people aren’t worried about deer breaking into their homes while they sleep, so stop with this nonsense.
For the brain dead in the thread, you are the only people to whom it must be explained that association doesn’t equal agreement. The rest of the world that has more than one brain cell and understands this, which is why this performative virtue signaling looks so stupid.
The only people who cared what the actors thought were the rage mob who wanted uniform agreement as proof of subjugation, nothing more. The rest of us assumed that they all had separate and distinct brains with their own thoughts.
That’s the demo that gives Twitter any value by their usage. You don’t penalize your power users, you partner with them. That said, I hope this is a troll and either verify everyone (which will help with bots) or no one.
Ain’t no one payin for digital indulgences except people who bought into Twitter’s weird treatment of verification for status and not actual verification purposes. I’d let it lapse if true.
Also, why would anyone want to pay to have a status graphic by their name from an entity that deletes followers (30k one night), shadowbans accounts, suspended thousands for sharing the NYP Hunter Biden story (🙋🏻♀️) and continues to suspend people over pronouns?
Joe Biden’s son founded a firm with the CCP and earned millions, and will earn more off of Democrats’s “Green New Deal” — Hunter facilitated China’s acquisition of one of the largest cobalt mines in the world, in the DRC. Democrats refuse to investigate Biden influence peddling.
Joe Biden had even apparently agreed to cover the fees for Hunter’s restructuring of his CCP-partnered firm as Joe was transitioning to White House. Reported by outlets I suspect have more interest in replacing Joe than sounding the alarm for voters, but it happened.
Good backstory here on how Joe and Hunter took Air Force 2 to meet Xi Jinping and days later the CCP approved Hunter’s deal to create BHR with Jonathan Li (Joe later wrote college recs for Li’s son).
No one is arguing this. What people DO wonder is why *now* push this bill -- when you've no majority and we're 55 days from midterms -- & give your opposition a running issue, pull from their econ failures, & jeopardize a potential post-midterm majority that would pass your bill.
Sure Biden will veto it, but if this move is to truly serve the issue of life, do you do it BEFORE an election and give embattled Dem candidates a flag to wave or AFTER election when there could be more GOP senators and the bill has a better chance of progressing?
Incumbents who endanger other candidates' seats with their stupid strategy should pay the candidates's added campaign costs that will come with fighting this issue.