“The last few weeks have demonstrated how prone the market is to FCI easing when the marginal policy decision becomes incrementally dovish.”
“As mentioned in prior notes, I believe this would be a mistake...FCI easing is NOT what the Fed needs at this stage of their inflation fight.”
“Based on the current/realised levels of FCI, the GDP impulse fades from close to -2% currently to -1.2% in Q1 and then turns positive by Q3 next year.”
“…risk is that when those negative impulses wash out (temporary on the way up so temporary on the way down), we are left with sticky inflation above the target range, largely driven by high wage growth.”
👆
+Core/Energy Tag-Team as Oil hits Supply/Demand Singularity Point.
How apropos for the times.
As a gamer I am pleased about this. I don't wanna see a whole bunch of games become "Xbox exclusives" especially since PS5 is a superior platform.
“we’re going into 2023 with a stock market that charges an 18 multiple for the prospect of ... 0% earnings growth."
Is that bad?
Re: Mental Model-Destructive/Constructive Interference In Econ Cycles
Thinking about where we are in the Oil Cycle reminds me of this this Mental Model from Physics.
(SHORT THREAD)
Econ cycles come in varying wavelengths; LT cycles = long wavelengths & ST cycles = short wavelengths.
ST cycles often oscillate within LT cycles.
In Oil, LT cycles are driven by capex cycles that have 5-10 year gestation periods and primarily affect SUPPLY. ST cycles are driven by the macroeconomy and primarily affect DEMAND.
In this Mental Model, I’m making a simplifying assumption that this complex interplay between Supply and Demand boils down to LT/ST impacts on PRICE.
Even this simplifying assumption is complicated by the differing wavelengths that result in periods where super-imposed waves are out-of-phase vs. in-phase.
Destructive Interference occurs when one wave is out-of-phase with another -> Overall superimposed wave is DAMPENED.
Constructive Interference occurs when one wave is in-phase with another -> Overall superimposed wave is AMPLIFIED.
Oil is going into a period of Destructive Interference now, but it will be followed by a period of Constructive Interference.
This is how it is entirely consistent to have a ST bearish view due to macro demand factors while still maintaining a LT bullish view due to LT capex trends.
(END THREAD)
The Structural Supply/Demand Singularity in Oil occurs when the ST cycles get back in-phase with the LT capex cycle.
I think there is a good probability of this occurring in 2024.
One thing I didn’t mention in this Mental Model is wave AMPLITUDE.
LT cycle may have a very large ultimate amplitude but wavelength is long so an negative (out-of-phase) ST cycle of large amplitude can dominate for periods of time.
Bad news for the Republicans:
No one to blame if they fuck it up
I hope a united Government can unite the COUNTRY now.🙏🇺🇸
My Macro Trades this am:
- Took profit on my $SVIX on this Vol Crush
- Bought $SPY Put Spreads to fade this extreme ebullience, especially with LT Yields SPIKING
- Bought $XOM Put Spreads because of my concern that Trump gives Saudis a "Security Guarantee For Oil" Deal
I'm staying long USDCNH and USDHKD because I think the USD WRECKING BALL is back with a vengeance with the prospect of Anti-China TARIFFS pushing the PBOC into a severe DEVALUATION as their weapon of last resort.
Glad to be back on again with @dmoses34 & @GuyAdami to talk about Macro, JPY, CNY, Gold, Oil but perhaps most importantly -- HOW CONTAGION HAPPENS. We end with an Idiosyncratic Event-Driven idea.
I highlighted BOJ's Dilemma as potentially the FIRST Domino in last weekend's "Battle of the BADS" post.
From the Show Notes this weekend, I wrote:
"Devaluation is the LESS BAD Choice for each of the individual actors (BOJ/PBOC/ECB) acting on its own because even though these countries run the risk of importing Commodity Inflation, they also benefit from Export Competitiveness...
The PROBLEM for Risk Assets globally is that when all of these CBs make the decisions that are most optimal (LESS BAD) for themselves, they can trigger COMPETITIVE DEVALUATIONS, which is what led to the Asian Contagion 1.0 of 1997-1998."