Taibbi and Musk missed something big about those Hunter Biden porn tweets Twitter took down in 2020. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Twitter suppressed the NYPost's Hunter Biden story in Oct 2020, an error. But they also suppressed nonconsensual tweets showing Hunter Biden's penis. And Taibbi and Musk also attacked those deletions. Musk said deleting them violated the First Amendment. thebulwark.com/no-you-do-not-…
But look at who was positing these Hunter Biden dick pics that Musk said are vital speech, contributing to Trump, paradoxically, to call for terminated the Constitution. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Of three tweets deleted at the Biden campaign's request in this screenshot Taibbi shared last week, all three that the Internet Archive can recover include Hunter selfie in which he's standing in front of a mirror, with his penis out. (I cropped out.) 
The first was from a user with a sketchy address who also had the handle "ding_gang."
Wang Dinggang, known as "Lude," in '20 was a top ally of Bannon patron Guo Wengui, and made wild false claims about Hunter while releasing his explicit pics/videos. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Wang Dinggang, known as "Lude," in '20 was a top ally of Bannon patron Guo Wengui, and made wild false claims about Hunter while releasing his explicit pics/videos. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
The third deleted tweet, with the same Hunter pic, was from from this user. The same person, with a Chinese handle that means "fitness training" is still on Twitter, and identifies himself as a member of Bannon and Guo's New Federal State of China.
The same guy in another social media account also identifies himself as a member of a group of Guo followers based in Long Island. (They're called "Mountains of Spices," or MOI.) A former Guo org person told me this guy uses the name Wenyang, and volunteers posting stuff for Guo.
I reported this year on slew of communications Guo sent directing followers to post Hunter porn stuff online, and to lie about it. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…. Bannon had it provided to them. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
The particular picture of Hunter that was in three of the tweets that Musk said were vital free speech was part of the material Bannon had sent to Guo (among comms I later obtained). It was in a Dropbox file called “Salacious Pics Package_EDITED." motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Guo had his assistant send the contents of "Salacious Pics Package_EDITED" to a bunch of his followers on October 24. They posted it in various places. Lude and Wenyang tweeted the same day.
That picture was disseminated as part of an organized international effort to spread purely salacious pictures of Hunter. And from the beginning, Guo had his people accompany the pictures with crazy lies. That's a disinformation campaign, if anything is. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Guo people carried out that effort, but Bannon was behind it. He praised Guo follower's lies about Hunter in a October 31, 2020 meeting, lauding their “editorial creativity over the pictures.” motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
Twitter deleting consensual dick pics is not a conspiracy or even controversial. In 2020 they explicitly barred that kind of thing, and continue to. help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-p…
Twitter has also barred"coordinated harmful activity," since before fall 2020. web.archive.org/web/2020101502…. The New Federal State of China deliberately spreading salacious pictures and disgusting lies about Hunter Biden seems like exactly the kind of effort that policy aimed to stop.
Taibbi got back to me and basically argued all this doesn't matter, because the Biden campaign, and the Trump White House, had special access to Twitter execs. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
But with Musk citing these particular tweets while screaming about the First Amendment, I think most people would conclude their details, as well as the context in which they were posted, matters. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
