bttr Profile picture
Dec 12, 2022 15 tweets 8 min read Read on X
KMW called the @RheinmetallAG's #KF51 Panther a "3D power point project" & "a funny car" designed around a new gun. While it has not seen prodution yet, is at least the concept behind it sound?

At the recent Rheinmetall Defence Talks 2022, further details on KF51 were shared.
Unfortunately the presentations have not been made public, which means we have to rely on media coverage of the event to gain new informations. I've been trying to find articles on it, but at the moment I've only found an article on @DefenceReviewGr.

defencereview.gr/ellinikos-stra…
Luckily this article includes a few of the original slides regarding the #KF51 Panther's concept and capabilities. In its core, the KF51 is a conventional MBT with focus on use of new technologies while remaining affordable. An evolution rather than a revolution.
Networked operations are a key addition provided by the #KF51 over older MBTs. The Panther's crew can hand over targets to other vehicles, start and control micro-UAVs, control UGVs and (when fitted with an attack UAV or HERO starter) engage targets behind the line-of-sight.
The #Panther's FCS is designed to maximize the likelihood of being the first to detect the enemy, the first to fire & the first to hit. An AI-based Automated Target Acquisition, Classification, Tracking and Attack (ATTAC) system is integrated into the FCS.
The commander's SEOSS-2's sight can be fitted with the MSSA (main sensor slaved armament) add-on to be turned into an RWS or with a counter-UAV radar to detect/track low-flying air threats.

A 4-10 kW HEL can also be installed to defeat micro-UAVs.
The #KF51 isn fitted with 10 different camera modules (4 on hull, 6 on turret) for 360° surveillance, an upgraded EMES gunner's sight & SEOSS-2 sight for the commander. Additional sensors (laser warners, acoustic detection and a meteorological sensor) are mounted on the turret.
The NATO Generic Vehicle Architecture (NGVA) is fully implemented and acts as the digital core of the KF51. The software is certified to common cyber security standards; it allows the use of on-board status analysis & test systems. Software also assists maintenance.
A key focus of the #KF51 is improving survivability. This is done with polyvalent add-on armor having passive components capable of defeating mid - not medium - calibre rounds. The roof is protected against bomblets A mine protection kit is not installed as standard.
Additional protection is provided by the hard kill StrikeShield active protection system against ATGMs, RPGs & APFSDS. There also is sensor triggered active armor. Together with the base armor, this should enable the KF51 to resist current anti-tank weapons (within frontal arc).
In addition to the conventional armor, the upper hemisphere of the #KF51 #Panther is protected by a Top Attack Protection System (TAPS). The TAPS consist of the StrikeShield APS, the ROSY smoke screen system and a different (EW?) system mounted on the bustle against drone swarms.
In terms of armament, the Panther was showcased with a 130 mm L52 gun (10-30 rounds depending on config), a 12.7 mm coaxial machine gun (1,250 ready rounds) and a Natter RWS (2,500 ready rounds of 7.62 mm ammo).

10 ready 130 mm rounds can be replaced with a 4-starter of HERO120.
The autoloader reaches a minimum loading time of four seconds and a minimum feeding time of two seconds. In best case (i.e. the second round is already located in the feeding tray/arm), two shots can be fired within just three seconds time.
The Natter RWS is meant for defeating infantry and smaller drones. Instead of a 7.62 mm MG, a larger 12.7 mm HMG or a 40 mm HV grenade launcher (HK GMW, Mk 19, etc.) can be fitted instead.

Forgot to include this picture...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with bttr

bttr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bttr01438851

Apr 8
Die Bundeswehr hat letzten Monat Rheinmetall mit der Lieferung von 123 Schweren Waffenträgers Infanterie (sWaTrg Inf) beauftragt, einer Variante des Boxer mit 30-mm-Turm als Wiesel-Ersatz für die sogenannten Mittleren Kräfte.

Der Schwere Waffenträger Infanterie basiert dabei auf dem für 🇦🇺 entwicklten Boxer CRV Block 2 und wird Down Under gefertigt, um eine schnelle Lieferung zu ermöglichen. Die ersten 19 Fahrzeuge sollen bereits 2025 ausgeliefert werden, 10 davon per Lufttransport.
Die Fertigung in 🇦🇺 ist nicht unumstritten; das Fahrzeug wurde in 🇩🇪 entwickelt und die Kosten für Transport und anfallende Zölle sollen laut Bundesrechnungshof im zweistelligen Millionenbereich liegen. Ein Konkurrenzangebot (Fertigung in 🇩🇪) soll etwa halb so teuer gewesen sein. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jun 4, 2023
In reaction to Russia revealing the T-14 Armata and fielding Relikt ERA, Rheinmetall has increased work on new penetrators.

Early patents suggest focus on optimizing penetrator design: by reducing tip diameter or making the penetrator (partially hollow), length can be increased. ImageImageImageImage
In a further step, Rheinmetall has patented steps towards a "smart penetrator": using a hollow channel in the center of the penetrator to allow installing a cable, which then can be used to transmit a signal to the tip of the APFSDS sub-projectile. ImageImage
When firing the APFSDS round, a small fuze in the projectile tip can be set via the datalink through the penetrator. Shortly before impacting, the fuze would fire the tip against the ERA protected target using a small explosive charge - defeating the ERA before main rod impact. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 4, 2023
In 1971, Krauss-Maffei offered the Leopard 1 "in a simplified variant" to Switzerland as part of a tender for the procurement of tank destroyers.

In order to simplify the vehicle, the electro-hydraulic turret drives and the TRP 2A commander's sight were removed. Image
Following this offer, the German MoD allowed the Switzerland to test two Leopard 1 tanks between July 1971 and March 1972. In the trials, the Leopard 1 competed against the Chiefain and Panzer 68.

Based on informations forwarded to Krauss-Maffei, the Leopard 1 won these trials. Image
This prompted the company to offer the Leopard 1 not only as simplified tank destroyer, but also as a potential replacement/supplement for the Panzer 61 and Panzer 68.

Five different configurations (mostly differing in FCS and sensors) were offered.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 8, 2023
One big difference between modern tanks and Soviet ones is the addition of blowout panels and blast doors in order to improve the post penetration survivability.

The idea is simple: if the ammunition detonates, the blast is vented upwards rather than into the crew compartment.
Obviously this only works if the blast doors are closed and intact; if the blast doors are open or were pierced by a projectile/fragments, then the blast of an ammo detonation (or the fire and heat from a slower deflagration) will kill the crew.
But even if the blast doors are closed, blowout panels and compartmentation are not a guarantee for the crew's survival when the main gun ammunition detonates. Why is that?
Read 26 tweets
Apr 9, 2022
In Anbetracht der angekündigten Ost-Offensive der russischen Streitkräfte und der Diskussion um deutsche Waffenlieferungen, sollte man vielleicht einen Blick auf die Millionenstadt Charkiw und andere bedrohte Städte werfen.

Charkiw ist das (wehr)industrielle Zentrum der Ukraine.
Dort befindet sich u.a. das Malyschew-Panzerwerk. In der Sowjetunion wurden in diesem charkiwer Werk zehntausende KPz T-64 gebaut.

Nach 2014 wurden zudem viele der im Donbass-Konflikt beschädigten Panzer in Charkiw repariert und nachgerüstet.
Die komplette Reparatur von beschädigten Kampfpanzer soll damals zwischen ein bis drei Monaten gedauert haben.

Damals konnten etwa ein Fünftel der beschädigten Panzer aufgrund der Schwere der Schäden nicht repariert werden.

Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(