I have obtained some unofficial, almost complete final turnout figures in NV, and they are eye-opening.
Permit me a thread that unfurls just how bad the GOP losses were considering the party's large turnout relative to Dems. Candidates, indies and ticket-splitters mattered.
1/7
1. Republican turnout (about 69 percent) far outdistanced Dem turnout (about 60 percent). It was a 10-point GOP edge in the Dem stronghold of Clark!
2. Mail ballots were about 50 percent of the total, and Dems won those 43-28, or about 75,000 votes. (Dems won by 20% in '20.)
2/7
3. Most of the mail margin for the Dems was in Clark, where they won by 2-to-1 or nearly 80,000 votes -- thanks, Reid Machine/Culinary. Dems also won Washoe mail, by 10K votes. 4. GOP won Election Day by a stunning margin, 2-to-1, or 46K votes. But ED was only 21% of total.
3/7
5. The GOP also won in-person early voting by a substantial margin, about 50K votes, or 17%, just above its 2020 margin. But that was only about 27% of the total ballots cast.
4/7
6. GOP overperformed in Clark but relatively low rural turnout (only 12% of total) and especially Washoe, which had 63% turnout compared to Clark's 51%, killed Adam Laxalt. Consider this about Washoe: Repubs won Washoe by 7K and Laxalt lost Washoe by 8K. Inconceivable!
5/7
7. These numbers back up what we thought: Laxalt was a terrible candidate, rejected by his home-county
voters, and Gov-elect Joe Lombardo's team did what Laxalt did/could not: Appeal to indies and swing major party voters in some combination.
6/7
Ds held onto 3 House seats, made gains in Leg (as well as saving CCM, holding key statewides) by not just relying on turning out Ds but also D-leaning indies. Same old NV story: Ds play chess, Rs play checkers. If Lombardo didn't have a top-tier team, he would have lost, too.
7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many of you know there is no bigger Michigan fan than I -- U-M, that is. But the notion that the state of MI should go first in the Dem presidential nominating process is laughable for many reasons. NV remains the obvious first choice. 1/
First, why would the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee give a nod to a state that doesn't even meet its criteria? Michigan is not only not as diverse as NV, but check out the requirements below: "the cost and logistical requirements of campaigning in state" must be considered. 2/
Second, why would the Dems give a head start to MI Gov. Gretchen Whitmer were she to run for president in 2024 -- er, I mean 2028? It's obviously not fair. No one in NV, even @AaronDFordNV, is running for president anytime soon. So MI should not even be considered.
3/
Let me tell you about the NV GOP leaders and who these people really are:
Last night, the party chair and GOP national committeewoman, who also lost for state treasurer, appeared at a GOP rally in Vegas and played the blame game when plenty of mirrors are available. 1/4
Chairman @McDonaldNV yelled about "backstabbers" who endorsed against @VoteFiore and @Chattah4Nevada, two of the worst candidates ever to be nominated by the party and who were defeated. McDonald has presided over the worst GOP cycles and has never taken any responsibility.
2/4
But Fiore's speech was one of the most repellent, revolting things I have seen, and for her, that's saying something. The RNCwoman called one of the GOPers who endorsed against her an alcoholic whore whom she all but accused of sleeping with a married Dem elected official.
3/4
Generally I have ignored most of the election week trolls (or not seen them), but since so many socialists are taking credit for the Dem victories here, I need to clarify:
The state party had as little to do with the Dem victories as the state GOP did with the gov's race. 1/
The amateurs running the state party were an impediment every step of the way and if the pros here had not played nice with them when they had to but set up parallel orgs to actually raise $ and, you know, turn out voters, Georgia might still be important.
2/
CCM and others won here in spite of the NV Dems, which put out pabulum-filled news releases and nothing more. They even tried to hurt the incumbent Dem LG in the primary - and she ended up losing in the general. Well done, geniuses. This was the Reid Machine/Culinary. Period.
3/4
By the end of the day we may know if NV has rendered Georgia irrelevant or if everyone still has Georgia on their minds.
Adam Laxalt is ahead by 862 votes, or .09%, closer than when his grandfather beat Harry Reid in 1974 for this seat.
There are 23,000 or so votes to count in Clark County. If Catherine Cortez Masto can win just 55 percent of those, under what she has done since Tuesday, she will be ahead. That would leave about 8,000 or so in Washoe, where she won by 10% Friday, and a few thousand rural votes.
We won't know whether the patterns will hold until votes are released sometime today and/or tonight.
You can keep asking me when and I will keep telling you: Hell if I know. It has been haphazard so far.
Don't forget there also are about 5.5K votes from Clark provisionals, too.
Thread on NV ballot-counting:
I know the "NV takes too long" memes have started (again), and we deserve it. But let's go over what is happening and what is not:
1. This is only the second mail-dominant election we have had. And the process required by law is laborious.
1/6
It would be a fruitful discussion for lawmakers to have if this is the best way to run a railroad. Changing deadlines, providing more resources, etc. Sure, the Dems changed the law to help them. But guiding principle should be maximizing accessibility to voting.
2/6
2. Those crying fraud -- from Trump to Lindsey Graham -- either don't understand the process or don't care. They also are bad at math. All campaigns knew the rules since the mail ballot law passed last year. Anyone acting like Louis Renault now is playacting, lying or both.
3/6