Richly textured coverage of @megannlively's story:
"Evangelical leader Russell Moore calls her a “pivotal” figure in bringing awareness of sexual abuse to the Southern Baptist Convention; best-selling author and Bible teacher Beth Moore calls Lively a “hero.” 1/
"What are the demands of being a Christian survivor?
Is there room for Lively’s belief that the theology banning women from spiritual leadership has often been used to silence survivors? Room to confront conservative Christianity about what it means to treat women well? 2/
"Is there also room to be a strong, outspoken survivor whose ethos is also bubbly and playful? Can there be #MeToo without being, well, too #MeToo? 3/
Beth Allison Barr..said Lively may be trying to thread an impossible needle. Theology...is something woven through people’s lives from childhood...Barr said she believes that the theology that keeps women from leadership is shaped by attitudes viewing women as sexual temptations.
“These are lessons that don’t disappear overnight just because we changed the rules at church.” When cases of abuse arise in religious settings, “there’s still this attitude: ‘It’s not systemic; it’s individuals who have sinned,’ ” @bethallisonbarr said. 5/
“I suspect that has to do with the idea that women’s voices matter less.”--@bethallisonbarr 6/
"Lively also notices that the billboard they see when they go to the beach that used to say “I Love You. — God,” now says “#MenToo.” 7/
"In a tweet naming herself as the unidentified sexual assault survivor in the Post article, she incl a photo of her family looking away from the camera, on a beach. That image, she believed — of a blonde woman with a husband & 2 kids, all White, a stereotypical ideal Chr family8/
— would be more likely to trigger emotion and action in her community of conservative evangelicals than an image of a non-White family or single mom.
“I knew if these men in Texas saw this ‘perfect’ family in their mind — I purposely did that,” she said. “It’s sad it worked.” 9/
"Rachael Denhollander...said she is also very deliberate about how she presents herself in the church. Low ponytail. Pastel colors, not power colors. Shirt sleeves to the elbow. Neckline to the collarbone. 10/
“All the steps we go through to be calm, submissive, meek women,” Denhollander said. Waiting for the pastor to put his hand over my head,[to say]: ‘She has my permission to speak.’ There are all these calculations. I shouldn’t have to do that,&it’s not more godly to be that way.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Conversations around Jay Green's piece last week drew the attn of Kevin DeYoung at World, who frames calls for evidence as evidence itself of illiberalism, & dismisses Green's response to criticism as evidence the guild isn't open to critical interaction. kristindumez.substack.com/p/what-is-acti…
It did, however, prompt me to share the plenary that I gave at this year's CFH meeting. KDY cherry-picked the talk for his purposes, but if you listen, you'll see that I reject what is often understood to be "activist history" while also asking that we examine the concept itself.
I put my cards on the table, as a (Reformed) Christian, a historian, and a scholar of gender. And I plead, once again, that we find ways to engage the very real differences between us with honesty and integrity.
Greatly appreciate this piece by my colleague @jrwalcott on Betsy DeVos's recent visit to @Calvin_Uni, her alma mater. In the spirit of DeVos's desire "to debate & advance" the policies she's promoting, & as a Chr, Walcott offers a different vision of edu: calvinchimes.org/2022/12/04/mor…
"For example, her call to support “students & not systems” fails to recognize that student learning can be supported by teachers, curriculum, financial resources, school administrators &, yes, in many cases may even require a building conducive to learning.
"It is easy to demonize systems, but the use of this sort of false dichotomy is ultimately unproductive. We also need to carefully consider Secretary DeVos’ focus on parental choice and individual rights as the basis of her calls to change our educational system.
From start to finish this whole thing has sickened me, but maybe not for the reasons you might think. What worries me is that the way this entire conversation has been framed & carries on poisons the well. B/c there are real issues at stake, & people & communities I care about.1/
Big picture, I want to add some broader context. For my lefty followers, I want to point out that for conservative white NeverTrump evs, this has been a really hard few yrs. They've sacrificed a significant portion of their audience to take the position they have... 2/
They've lost esteem and authority in communities where they were once deeply respected. I know this better than most, b/c I've studied it. At the same time, they're not getting a lot of applause from the other side. Their critiques don't go far enough in many people's eyes. 3/
Just learned that @Calvin_Uni admits & applications are way up for next year. Sometimes I'm asked why bother staying, & it's because I love doing what I do as part of this community. There are a lot of Chr colleges but few w/ the academic depth & global reach.
Follow along: 1/
First, meet our new president. Here's the official intro:
But here's an unofficial intro--throwing a Halloween party at the end of an incredibly packed week of inaugural events just b/c it'd be fun. (That's @WiebeB_Africa & Dale Cooper aka Matt Halteman, a leading Chr philosopher/author of @BasicBooks forthcoming THE VEGAN IMAGINATION.