“Looks like the media is starting to report on this [the origin of the pandemic] more factually....If they get my cables they’ll also know it was essentially predicted in 2018.”
5. Prediction Probably made by Rick Switzer
Allegedly, according to @joshrogin, Switzer, a science and technology expert from the US embassy in Beijing, attended a presentation in Beijing from Ben Hu concerning the WIV chimeric Sars-CoV-1 experiments.
Switzer traveled to Wuhan to visit WIV and wrote a 2nd cable. As a result of Switzer's visit, cables were sent to the US State Department from the embassy
Including one for Autonomous Therapeutics in conjunction with "Navy Medical Research Unit-2, funded directly by DARPA".
12. Important Note
Navy Medical Research Unit-2 was the same outfit involved (with Pasteur Institute) in the sampling expedition in 2017 in Laos at the exact site where the BANAL viruses were found
I believe I was the first person to discover that fact!
"Autonomous is developing what may be the 1st pan-genus antivirals to provide resistance-proof protection against any coronavirus (including future viral mutants that may evade vaccines)
The company is backed by DARPA & BARDA"
"We then started doing the same thing for coronaviruses (well before the COVID-19 pandemic)"
16. The Method
"We developed a single biologic with prophylactic efficacy against any Influenza A strain...Armed with the influenza data, we started working on coronaviruses six months before COVID-19 hit....."
17. Random Beta-Coronaviruses?
"The question was whether we could develop a single antiviral for both MERS and SARS, and by extension, for whatever random beta-coronavirus would emerge next."
18. DARPA's Role
"DARPA’s willingness to believe in small businesses like ours and in yet-unproven technologies is a key reason that we have been able to take off."
And take off they certainly have!
19. The Idea
A. They create a therapeutic based on shared viral genomic architecture - that works on MERS, SARS and any beta-coronavirus that might emerge
B. So to prove your concept you have to show it works on MERS and SARS and then show it works on a random beta-coronavirus
20. Did someone say "How Banal"?
You can't do that using pseudotyped viruses, even in cell culture experiments, you need a live full-length virus, a live full-length random beta-coronavirus...
Accessible via PREEMPT Team Partners
21. Therapeutic Interfering Particles (TIPs)
These are essentially small parts of the viral genome delivered as mRNA as discussed in a recent Scripps Institute paper
.
"First and foremost, the intervention was unable to fully eliminate virus transmission from source animals, since contact animals did become infected"
(TIP intervention did not generate transmission sterilization in the Syrian hamsters)
23. The Potemkin Conjecture
Hence using this approach you could infect people such as military athletes with your "random beta-coronavirus" and provided they were also treated with the TIP, they would be fine but they could still infect others.
24. More DARPA Grants for Dr. Weinberger
Autonomous Therapeutics had two other DARPA grants - worth looking at both.
The first written in 2017:
New Platform Technologies for Viral and Therapeutic Evolution Assays
"The first influenza TIPs capable of long-term, prophylactic efficacy through Phase I human clinical trials"
26. Betacoronavirus TIPS?
This is a Phase I trial, ie testing the safety of their TIPs on humans - so they have a product formulated to a sufficient level to use on humans
There is no reason they could not have also done a pilot of their "beta coronavirus" TIP on humans.
27. Further Investigation is Needed
Autonomous Therapeutic's technology is patented and we have no idea what might be on AT's servers, but from the abstract it seems something that is more substantial that the 2 kb that the Scripps Institute were using in their recent paper.
28. Wuhan
AT worked on military projects
Did they run a Phase I pilot on military volunteers - some of whom went to the Wuhan Military Games?
Did the TIP revert and regenerate a live virus?
a recombination event?
a premature stop codon reverting?
"Autonomous Therapeutics address looks familiar, former home to Uniformed Services Prostate shop, which collects blood from the military. Google search shows the awning as CPDR which is military connected"
30. The Potemkin Hypothesis in a Nutshell
"DARPA and Autonomous Therapeutics generated Sars CoV-2 but they did so for altruistic purposes and it was just an "unfortunate oversight" that led it to revert from a harmless TIP to a live virus on the WIV's doorstep"
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.