This the trajectory of a years long battle in the US in just four tweets
Debating the details based on the values attached to 'woke' and 'CRT' is pointless. Maybe better to follow the money and the history and massive impacts
"The EPF analysis found that over US$702 million had been spent in the European region... against the right to abortion, against LGBT rights, against children’s rights and against equality overall." aidsmap.com/news/may-2021/…
If we default to more fear based on labels and abandoning faith in others, it only plays into hands of those who gain from the division
Almost all of us can compromise when we sit down, listen, respect our myriad differences. Very sad to think of this happening here
Some other background here on the operational tactics used beyond the moral imperative. A lot of genuine concerns have been blown up and demonised for political purposes and the only winners are all the backers
If we persecute any group just for who they are or what they believe in, if they are not infringing on rights of others, then we all lose. When we spend time with most people, they want a fair hearing, honesty, trust
Trying to counter an accusation with vague definition and self-referencing 'evidence' (for CRT similar to voter fraud stories) is almost impossible in the moment. An inherent feature is fostering distrust in other sources
It links to this perennial call to protect 'free speech' with change being pushed to task Office for Students with policing. This has forever been incredibly selective
Plus the threatening of critics in the face of all rational evidence to keep trying the same again while expecting results to differ. We need evidence, honesty, and some signs of integrity
Another look into govt priorities, here on data protection. It is not growth and innovation Vs regulation. It is a public welfare based balance with a robust risk assessment. Absent here
Might we need better than leaders with this kind of track record? When I do diligence for deals I assess truth of claims, delivery feasibility and the reputation and track record of firms
Perhaps that explains my constant questioning of successive ministers
Might there be too many tangled and vested interests, of the kind that led to this furious resignation of our prior counter fraud minister, Lord Agnew?
Seemingly trust, truth, and integrity. Indicative anecdote from author of books about the rise of the right in the US @rickperlstein. Do we really see substantial change with Sunak?
Where is the substance to back up the promises? Instead we have his commitment to crack down on the unions and protests. How does that work to curb the NHS staff attrition?
Look better, spin better, work to boost us past concerns about plans for deregulation and privatisation?
Surpassing the ironic edge this is Paterson challenging his sanction for lobbying for Randox. Using the ECHR to sue the government
While staunch advocate for ECHR withdrawal and repeal of Human Rights Act. Fact trumping fiction theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
More on that story at the time
Paterson's case was leveraged to try and neuter the parliamentary standards body. A story with side order of close relationships with media, lobbyists and other interests bylinetimes.com/2020/11/02/min…
Just more perspective on this kind of policy in the most recent budget
But a survey of less than 10 history programmes, used by The Telegraph to draw the conclusion that the BBC is betraying Churchill, is the thing that should occupy our attention?
Adding to this thread, with the CRT landing on our shores as another US / Hungarian shibboleth for the kind of people they want out of our higher education it is worth some research on the future that indicates
@ruthbenghiat is commenting on the same skewed race outrage farming
The RAAC thing has completely broken my head. The timing has to be a decision, unless it was forced by a leak. This government that did everything not to shut schools doing this? What is going on? I suspect more will come out
Perhaps close enough to the election to guarantee the cost is a problem for the next administration. @bylinetimes reporting in June, to go with what you know about Gove cancelling the school building programme in 2010. It's a 'Why now?' not 'Why? question bylinetimes.com/2023/06/28/hun…
Why is our human rights act and ECHR inconvenient for government? Not just about people on small boats. What could a government do to you and your family if there is no backstop to appeal elsewhere and laws can be changed and passed with little consideration of human rights?
That is the frustration driving this move. The NHS data reuse and AI ambitions are central here, as are the plans for deregulation. If done carelessly and workers rights and consumer rights are run roughshod over, the equation is 'Will we get caught and can we be sanctioned?'
That is evidenced here from when an EU delegation came to review plans for Data Protection divergence with the Data Reform Bill (DPDI No.2 Bill as it is now)
Matt heaping on the easy to agree with nostalgia, with a nascent movement entirely dependent on social media and targeting people to foster grievance at some poorly defined blob of 'new elite' people
Free Speech Union, as the main partner organisation, is run by an Oxford graduate who has spent most of his life as contrarian loud hailer. All about the terrors of wokeness, diversity, and lack of race science in public policy. What exactly is fought for against and for here?
A nominally new sovereignty fight to congeal around for the election. Won't happen, for good reasons, but that simply adds grist to the mill for arguing 'EU' interference (it's Council of Europe, not part of the EU body we left)
If this government can pull off getting people to vote against their own Human Rights, then we would see rights in domestic law erode for all in the next parliament. What would weaker human rights do? Sure you can treat migrants how the heck you like, but same for everyone
Onwards and don't swerve to spare the proles? This is not exactly a quiet ambition. When Cameron had Beechcroft look into no fault firing, main flies in the ointment were equalities law, human rights act, EU worker protections, and ECHR appeal mechanisms. Not about your freedom
This is like letting NHS backlogs grow and staff leave so we hate that enough to tolerate NHS private rescue packages. These people are that utilitarian about lives. Suck it and see, fatally