1. EU doesn’t hate the IRA: IRA is 1st major attempt by a US administration to combat climate change. A good thing for US and the planet. Some EU companies have even benefitted from IRA (German heavy industry recorded 40% increase in Sept. 2022, compared to Sept. 2021).
2. IRA subsidies & tax breaks are the problem: Why?
1⃣EU green tech tempted to relocate production to US to benefit from generous subsidies & low energy prices;
2⃣confirms US industrial policy will continue to favour industry "Made in America".
3. EU countries know they must respond - but disagree on measures to take. Several options on the table: new fund; EU subsidies; national subsidies; Buy European Act; simplifying EU state aid and competition rules. All carry risks & none are mutually exclusive (I know, confusing)
4. Option 1, a new EU Sovereignty Fund: proposed by @vonderleyen and now the work of @ThierryBreton. A total of €350 billion, i.e. 2% of the EU’s GDP. The problem is, EU can’t agree where the money should come from - or how quickly it shd come.
5. Option 2, EU-wide subsidies: some countries open to a new mass investment plan, like the NextGenerationEU, but for EU green tech industry. All sorts of risks & pbs with this, not least: *who* allocates funding? *which* industries need it most? And more common EU debt. Tricky.
5. Option 3, national subsidies: EU wd provisionally suspend EU state aid rules to support critical industries. Wd need careful coordination to avoid intra-EU subsidy race. Also tricky.
6. Option 4, a Buy European Act: A 🇫🇷 proposal (that still needs clarifying..). From what I understand, this wd grant European preference in call for tenders. Privately, many EU officials in Brussels & across EU don't like it. Find it too protectionist. Needs refining.
7. Option 5, simpler EU rules: it's not simply abt making EU assistance available, it's also abt how quickly that assistance reaches EU businesses. EU cd simplify EU state aid/comp rules & speed up process for approving grants (it's still significantly slower than in the US)
8. In conclusion: IRA has caused consternation because it forces the EU to face up to industrial policy woes. As we’ve seen, industrial has ramifications for trade and foreign policy. It's going to be a key topic for next yr. So expect *lots more* from me on this.. END
The full piece is here. And I promise, EU industrial policy *is* fun. If you're into trade, foreign policy and/or transatlantic relations, then you shd really read it: institutmontaigne.org/en/analysis/re…
Hi 👋🏼! If I'm a bit quiet on here lately it's cos I'm spending too much time reading up on US' #InflationReductionAct (and the likes) to understand impact EU industry (I know, fun). Anyway, can someone please help me understand what an adviser to President Macron said.. 1/2
... when he/she said: "Macron is hoping to secure exemptions for certain EU industries" from IRA during his state visit to Washington tomorrow "like those Canada and Mexico benefit from". Help please? Thx 2/2
(Thank you to the kind souls who have already come to my rescue in PM).
Bon, je sais que j'habite en 🇫🇷 depuis 2 ans mais je ne comprends pas le sens de cette phrase d'un conseiller du Président: "nous pouvons imaginer que l'administration américaine consente des exemptions pour 1 certain nombre d'industries 🇪🇺" de l'#InflationReductionAct. Help plz?
Et si je suis plutôt calme sur ce réseau depuis un petit moment, c'est parce que je passe trop de temps à étudier des lois américaines et à comprendre les répercussions sur l'industrie européenne 🤪
1. First, it wd be strategic: France and UK are the 2 largest military and nuclear powers in Europe, with diplomatic operations to match. People-to-people ties are considerable. They share many of the same instincts. More unites them than divides them - on paper at least.
2. Second, it wd be political: Macron gains an ally on European defence and nuclear energy. Truss, who is proud to have been loyal to Boris Johnson until the bitter end, can complete what he never managed to achieve: a new chapter in the Franco-British relationship.
- Russia: must do everything to support Ukraine & make sure Russia doesn’t win. Must fight war crimes & cut Russia’s access to funds. 2/6
- Russia(bis): Only Ukraine can decide if and when it is ready to negotiate peace (and only Ukraine can decide what terms are acceptable). When peace comes to the continent, there must be no humiliation. 3/6
Macron says EU enlargement process can take decades. Is he right? Yes. But isn't he actually trying to frustrate enlargement process? No, he isn't. This is why. Short thread.
1. No way to #fasttrack EU membership: you can accelerate process of designating a third country a "candidate" country, you can even accelerate aspects of the negotiations. But you cannot fast-track EU membership as a whole.
2. Why? Because EU enlargement is complex. It's not just about political will. I wrote about it here (institutmontaigne.org/en/blog/making…) & tweeted steps here:
.@EmmanuelMacron takes the floor. He says he has good and bad news. The bad news is that he is going to give a speech (*I suspect this means longer than 10 minutes...). Good news is that he won't repeat what has been said in previous speeches.
[I won't be live-tweeting everything he says; I've done that before and I honestly thought he'd never stop talking. Will only tweet key bits]
1. Macron says that the conference on the Future of Europe (#CoFoE) shows that citizens want a stronger and more sovereign Europe.