The most important thing to know about the US data on foreign holdings of US Treasury securities is that the US doesn't really know who holds US Treasuries --
The biggest holders (after Japan and China) are ...
1/x
US Treasury holders, in rank order
Japan, China, the UK, Belgium, the Caymans, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Ireland
Only Japan and China (and to a degree Switzerland) are real holders, the rest are financial and custodial centers.
2/
The second most important thing to know -- apart from the continued (apparent) purchases of Treasuries from private investors abroad (even if the buyers are the Caymans and the UK in the transactional data) -- is that China isn't selling ...
3/
Neither the transactional data nor the custodial data fully capture China's activity.
But the transactional data showed Oct. purchases of Agencies and (surprisingly) Treasuries. The fall in the holdings data more or less disappears if you adjust for Agencies and Belgium
4/
It is in fact rather remarkable that after adjusting for the Belgian holdings (a euroclear account used by the PBOC it seems) China's fairly visible holdings of US bonds have stayed constant for the last 5ys (at ~ $1.6 trillion)
5/
Japan's holdings of US securities are dropping like a rock -- a lot of it is valuation, so that will change with the November data tho.
But there is no doubt that the MoF sold in September and October (more in September it seems)
6/
Japan reports the market value of the securities it holds in its reserves (as well as its actual intervention) and the US data shows the market value of Japan's holdings --
guess what, the changes recently have lined up nearly perfectly.
7/
The flow (transactional) numbers for Japan tend to be fairly accurate (at least for the MoF) -- they show $24b in Treasury sales for Oct v $37-38b in September
8/
The TIC data tho doesn't tend to capture Japanese (or for that matter Taiwanese) holdings of US corporate bonds all that well tho, so it clearly has some important gaps -- Japanese private investors holds more US securities than show up in the custodial numbers for JP.
9/
The October TIC data shows official sales of Treasuries, but ongoing private buying --
it is thus consistent with the flow of funds data for the year, which shows ongoing foreign purchases of Treasuries through q3 (even with China not buying and Japan selling)
10/
last note -- beware of any reports that just use the headline numbers for foreign holdings of Treasuries.
The holdings data is the most accurate part of the TIC data, but it really does need to be adjusted for valuation changes this year.
10/10
Bonus chart --
the big increases in foreign holdings recently have come from the UK, Belgium (likely China) and the Caymans ...
It is really hard to know who has been really buying abroad, tho someone has been.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump's new tariff rate lack rhyme or reason (other than rewarding big countries that made an effort to give him a win ... )
But -- as the decision on Brazil showed -- it is always important to know the exclusions as well as the headline rate ...
1/
The 35% tariff rate on Canada is crazy. Nuts. Insane. dumb. Shows a lack of interest in supporting US manufacturing (the US runs a surplus in manufactures with Canada).
But if oil and USMCA compliant trade are exempt, its practical impact will be modest ...
2/
Same with the high tariff on Switzerland. Crazy. Even to my eyes, and I am no fan of Switzerland's coddling of corporate tax avoidance.
But most US imports from Switzerland are pharmaceuticals and gold, and both are exempt from the reciprocal/ IEEPA tariffs
3/
China appears to have changed its intervention rule, and now intervenes (via the state banks) at the mid point of the band, not the strong side of the band ...
Hope others find this chart as helpful as I did -- the yuan has spent very little time on the strong side of the fix (the theoretical mid point in the band) and, more importantly, the proxy for state bank intervention shoots up if spot is close to the fix
2/
The failure of the yuan to stay consistently on the strong side of the fix is sometimes taken as evidence either of a lack of appreciation pressure or as evidence of a lack of (dollar buying) intervention -- but I don't think either is true
Probably the most important chart for the world economy right now -- Chinese export growth in both q1 and q2 was close to 10%; Chinese import growth has been flat (q2) or negative (q1)
With exports 20% of GDP, implies a huge net export contribution ...
1/
This excellent FT story provides the narrative to go along with the hard data -- China's localities have tremendous incentives to subsidize the production of overcapacity in new and old sectors alike. & with internal demand weak, exports result
Combine weak internal demand, a weak CNY & overly enthusiastic support for new sectors inside China & China ends up distorting the entire global economy.
The census advance June trade data shows the goods trade deficit (which in accurately measured at a high frequency) fell back to around $1 trillion USD in June
1/
The big swing in the data came from consumer goods (which includes pharma) and is partial payback for a super strong q1 ...
2/
Industrial supplies remains volatile, but without the tariff fear induced q1 imports of gold, imports have dipped a bit
But we don't need to guess about the impact of China's industrial policy successes (and macroeconomic failures) on the US -- EU exports to China are already in a sustained decline
Americans, understandably focused on the (past and present) antics of Donald Trump, tend to underestimate the shift in elite European views toward China
Von der Leyen is perhaps a bit more hawkish than the European consensus, but there is no way this kind of message would have been delivered 4 years ago --
2/
And it isn't hard to figure out the source of the shift --
The pandemic swing in trade wasn't a blip, it was a change in trend ...