Share this page!

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Twitter logo
Dec 16 • 5 tweets • 3 min read
Art 363 #Kantara dispute in a nutshell is whether we support Constitution with Shri Rama or without Shri Rama.

Every State has a constitutional duty to express its views on this important issue and decide if it is with the official opinion of Centre

ImageImage
We request State of Telangana and State of UP where large number of Shri Rama bhakthas live to articulate their views on the above important issue of interpretation of our Constitution so we can appraise SC after we file our additional affidavit

The Centre will also have an opportunity to officially disown the wrong legal opinion on Art 363 #Kantara dispute and support the view expressed by Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji in Kashi
Shri Padmanabha of Travancore, Shri Kashi Vishwanath of Kashi , Shri Eklingji of Mewar, Shri Rama Raja of Orchha of Orccha Kingdoms Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b), thus States of Kerala,TN, UP, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh& Telangana since Shri Chilkur Balaji raised definitely take position
Whether we should abide by the merger promise or ignore it ?

Whether we should have Constitution with Shri Rama or without Shri Rama ?

Every State has a say it is not a matter that concerns only Centre
Hope States take this opportunity to articulate posn
ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 18
Why this imp but so far unrevealed GYAN about significance of Shri Rama, Seetadevi and Lakshmana picture in original constitution and its link to emblem of SC यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः given in GYANVAPI matter by Shri Rama Raja after revealing His Ruler Status?
Shri Rama Raja of Orchha revealed His status as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) a fact acknowledged by Hon'ble CM of Madhya Pradesh similar to how status of Shri Kashi Vishwanath was acknowledged by Hon'ble PM settling Art 363 dispute which was filed in previous affidavit in same matter ImageImage
A bit of historic research will reveal fact that both Gyanvapi and Shri Krishna Mathura temple demolished by Aurangzeb had been renovated/rebuilt using the property belonging to Shri Rama Raja of Orchha hence the below guidance to SC by Shri Rama Raja Deity in the Gyanvapi matter ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 17
"..Obligation of Thrippadidanam is inherited by this Hon’ble Court & it is how picture of Shri Rama, Seetadevi and Lakshmana in Original Constitution Part III page is to be understood...Art 26 is Antaratma of our Constitution which governs outcome as per emblem यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः" ImageImage
...of such matters brought before this Hon’ble Court when read with the obligation of Thrippadidanam inherited by this Hon’ble Court and of the Oath taken by Hon’ble Judges and meaning of GOD explained by Dr Ambedkar.." ImageImage
The affidavit ends with the important advise of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity in Koorma form which is part of Art 363 dispute papers already filed in previous additional affidavit. ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 17
The official opinion of Centre on Art 363 #Kantara dispute which is in violation of its own counsel position on rights of Prince of Arcot also Hon'ble PM Dec 13th view in Kashi of Deity Ruler status cannot be sustained anymore in light of strong affidavit
ImageImage
The entire Mewar Constitution is also filed which in itself nullifies the wrong official Centre's legal opinion. Hope UP State junks this and adopts the interpretation secured through devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community also filed in SC

ImageImage
A copy of important additional affidavit filed after securing guidance of Hon'ble former Chief Justice Venkatachaliah ji has been sent request Hon'ble MP Shri @DrRanjithReddy garu to also secure official support of Telangana State
ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 17
Divine planning
On concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam strongest Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity additional affidavit in SC bringing on record the greatest devotional contribution of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in resolving Art 363 #Kantara dispute filed
Image
The concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam will be remembered hundreds of years into future as the day when devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community with origin in TN was highlighted by Deities for their dharmik fight to restore Shri Rama in Constitution
The concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam day of strongest additional affidavit of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity will be remembered for ensuring victory of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal devotional community with origin in TN and ensuring recognition all over Bharat
Read 8 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 16
The last seven decades culminating in Shri Rama Digvijay Yatra celebrating victory of dharma in Art 363 #Kantara dispute can be described as journey of the Constitution with Shri Rama to Constitution without Shri Rama and back except as Bharat:India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya ImageImage
Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has played a pivotal role both in the beginning of the 👆 journey and in the end of the 👆 journey
"If God is banished from this "Ram Rajya", India will become Ayodhya without Ram "
Sentiment expressed in Constituent Assembly.
Interesting that in this seven decades journey we have banished God (Shri Rama) from Constitution & He has reentered by raising Art 363 #Kantara dispute Image
Read 7 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Dec 16
Dear Devotees we are in process to file final additional affidavit in gyanvapi matter in SC to bring on record great Art 363 #Kantara dispute resoln Ramayana interpretation secured end of Shri Rama Digvijay Yatra.
UP State will have to let SC know which interpretation it supports ImageImage
UP State will have to let SC know in resp to👆 additional affidavit whether it supports Constitutional Rama Rajya interpretation or Constitutional Morality doctrine Sabarimala interpretation i.e Constitution with Shri Rama or Constitution without Shri Rama
Different yardsticks for agreement with Prince of Arcot and agreement with Shri Rama cannot be applied is being brought on record before SC which wrong official opinion of Centre did on Art 363 #Kantara dispute
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(