A lesser-known piece of tech history from the late 80s and early 90s and what that can learn us about the implications for today's long-term tech investing.
(h/t WSJ)
1/10
⏬
In the late 80s, the tech sector had lost its mojo. Since the 1960s, the Cold War had spurred big defense investments in tech, but the Cold War was over now.
2 important things revived tech in the early 1990s.
2/10
⏬
The first initiative was legislative: the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991, better known as the Gore Bill.
The goal? To build the "Information superhighway" aka the internet. ARPANET had already started the evolution in the sixties & implemented the TCP/IP protocol.
3/10⏬
The Gore Bill pumped money into the system to reach the goal and the first web browser was developed, Mosaic, developed at National Center for Supercomputing Applications by Marc Andreesen @pmarca, who later also made the first commercial browser, Netscape.
4/10⏬
The Gore Bill also incentivized the roll-out of an interconnected high-speed fiber optic network.
The money and the technological advances spurred a gold rush, eventually leading to the dotcom bust.
What are the implications for and similarities with today?
5/10⏬
The Gore Bill injected about $1.3 billion in tech (inflation-adjusted).
Without the infrastructure and the research money, the internet would not have been a reality so fast. There was a bust but the subsequent boom lasts until now.
Today, it looks even better.😍
6/10⏬
The Chips and Science Act of this year injects a baffling $52.7 billion in the semiconductor sector and it could be the beginning of another boom.
What will the boom be in exactly? Next to money, you also need technology on the brink of a breakthrough.
7/10⏬
I think the most obvious candidate is AI. Just look at #gptchat for example. And that's just the very beginning.
But there are other candidates: 5G, AR&VR, autonomous driving, edge computing... Or maybe all of these or something entirely new we don't see coming.
8/10
⏬
The most important takeaway for investors is that, while sentiment for tech investing is low now, for long-term tech investors, the future still looks very bright. 😍
To end, a few questions for you, dear reader:⏬
9/10
What do you think will be the next big technology breakthrough platform?
What companies will benefit the most?
What companies have the potential to become the new Big Tech?
If you liked this, for more, feel free to follow me @fromvalue and feel free to retweet.
10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The 12 most dangerous words in investing are, 'The four most dangerous words in investing are: it's different this time. '”
~ @michaelbatnick
A reference to John Templeton, of course. Both are right. Human emotions never change, but circumstances are different.
⬇️
Many compare this to the dotcom bust, but you can not compare $GOOGL $GOOG, $AMZN, $MSFT, $AAPL and other big cap tech companies to back then. Was there a bubble in unprofitable crap companies? Of course. I fell into the $SKLZ trap, I can know. 😱
But it's also different.⬇️
Right now, many companies are very well-capitalized now and FCF-positive. Even if they are not, they can often survive for years if they kept losing money at the rate they do. But many start focusing on profitability now, even if they don't have to yet from a financial POV.
Revenue of $3.2B, up 17.4% YoY, beating by $190M.
Non-GAAP EPS of -$0.66 beats by $0.29.
Break-down⏬
Gross profit $1.2B, +21.7% YoY, gross margins 37.5% vs. 37.9% in Q2 and 37% in Q3 2021, so stable.
Net loss $(569.3)M, flat YoY, 38.9% improvement QoQ.
If you exclude SBC, severance packs and lease termination fees, net loss improved 49.4% QoQ.👍
⏬
Adjusted EBITDA $(357.7)M vs. $(165.5)M in Q3 2021, but 29.4% better than Q2 2022. If you exclude SBC, severance and lease termination, EBITDA improved 44.7% YoY.
Financially still strong: $7.3B in cash, equivalents and ST investments.⏬
Valuations for stocks are subjective and for high growth even more. Of course, that doesn't mean you can't say anything about valuation at all. You can say stock A is very expensive.
But a price tag is subjectivity disguised in objectivity. Let me explain why through $NET. ⬇️
$NET's management said that they were aiming to reach a run rate of $5B over 5 years without any acquisitions or new product launches. That's a CAGR of 38%. But even now, Cloudflare trades at a PS multiple of high teens. Too expensive? Maybe, maybe not.⬇️
What sales multiple do you give for a company with $5B in revenue, growing at 30%+ in 2027 and gross margins between 75% and 80%?
Your guess is as good as mine. And that's subjectivity, in my opinion. Or call it an educated guess at best. Let's put on some numbers. ⬇️
All those earnings tonight! Let's look at a few.Good results from $MELI:
Q3 GAAP EPS of $2.56 beats by $0.24.
Revenue of $2.69B, up +44.6% YoY in dollars, misses by $10M or just 0.37%, not really material. On an FX-neutral bais up 60.6% year-over-year :muscle:
More: 👇
Income from operations of $296 million, with an 11.0% margin
E-commerce:
GMV (gross merchandise volume, the 💲 amount of everything sold on the platform) up 31.5% to $8.6B.
# of Items sold +9%, which means that the value per sold item went up considerably.
More: 👇
That's great to see and show that more people trust MELI.
Ads: 1.3% of GMV, up from 0.9% a year ago. There is still a lot of room for growth left here. This enhances Mercado Libre's takerate.
Continued: 👇
In life and investing, too many people focus on risks and what they could lose but they don't look enough at what they could win.
That doesn't mean you shouldn't look at risks. It means you should ALSO look at the other side.
As people we are wired to look more at risks.
1/5
The reason is simple. If you saw something in the bushes, it was safer to assume it was an animal that could eat you instead of you eating it. The risk-reward balance was clear. But in life now and in investing, the risk is much smaller than being eaten if you play it smart.
2/5
Your personal situation should determine your approach. For example:
* when do you need your money that is in stocks?
* how much of your net worth does your portfolio represent?
* how are your emotions when it comes to volatility?
Etc.
So many of the best investors stood alone when the market turned.
In 2001, Bill Miller was under attack. Miller had invested in $AMZN in 1999 and shared his conviction publicly. The stock tanked from $107 to $5.5.
1/5
Miller was mocked and ridiculed.
But he added to his position and kept adding, bringing his average price down a lot and held all the way through. He's the biggest $AMZN shareholder "whose name is not Bezos."
It takes guts to be a great investor.
2/5
A Bill Miller quote:
“Most people try to maximize the number of times they’re right. The real question is how much you make when you’re right.”
Miller also bought $BTC between $200 and $700 and held all the way through. It grew into his biggest holding.
3/5