I’ve received a few requests to block #chatgpt on our school network. This feels like a pivotal moment in #edtech and 1:1 classrooms.

I believed going 1:1 & having access to an abundance of information was, in the hands of every student would fundamentally transform edu.

🧵
Change definitely occurred, but not in the way I had hoped & envisioned. In many ways 1:1 edtech became about productivity and testing machines. This is a reasonable progression, but missing huge opportunity.
My perspective has always been, what can we allow students to do with these devices that they could not do otherwise. While productivity, organization, assessment and access to class content improves efficiency, it doesn’t create new opportunities for students.
How can we give students opportunities and new paths to demonstrate their understanding in unique and creative ways?

How can we remove barriers for students and create more valid experiences to assess learning?

This was my hope for #edtech
Now with #chatgpt in the equation, we find out selves in a similar situation. Yet this one has a more immediate impact & the window educators have to evaluate what skills are valued, how AI tools impact those skills & how to recalibrated what is valued, is nearly shut.
Students are handing in work with #chatgpt. The pace of change has been accelerated and educators have practically no time to adjust and shift their practice to reflect this change.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Greg Kulowiec

Greg Kulowiec Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gregkulowiec

Jan 5
In two instances during my teaching career, students worked for days & weeks on a project, submitted their work…and no one asked what their grade was.

The common characteristics:
1. A meaningful question
2. Authentic audience
3. Technology in the service of learning

Quick🧵
Meaningful Question:

One with no right answer that compels students to know and understand the concept in order to form their own perspective and create evidence of their thinking.
Authentic Audience:

While the work was turned in, there was an embedded audience that was inherently more meaningful than my eyes & evaluation.

An audience of peers in another school states away & a global audience via YouTube.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(