1. William Dalrymple can afford to lord it over the heathen Hindu masses because he comes from a privileged, bohemian background. If he was in his native Uk he would look down upon working-class whites as ignorant #chavsspectator.co.uk/article/the-mo…
2. William Dalrymple elite types easily morph into the Lord Wavell and Churchill types who lauded Islam and found Hindu stuff despicable, Stalin's sycophants like Kim Philby, nazi worshippers such as Daily Mail owner Lord Rothermere and fascist leader Oswald Mosely.
3. India's independence dashed plans of #EnochPowell to become viceroy of India. However Dalrymple is more dexterous. He just transplanted himself into the India of his British East India Company ancestors and continued as if the British Raj never ended. bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…
4. Now Dalrymple warns that India will foam with rivers of blood because of its Hindu 'extremism'. It is this fascist style propaganda which led his beloved UK press to blame Hindus for the violence in Leicester. They are nothing more than pagan brown chavs.
5. These bohemian types reveal their true elitism with editor of the Guardian earnign 6 figures, and their true racism by taking out their Aryan white superiority out on Hindus. As can be seen by the Guardian stonewalling Hindus
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Abu Qatada, Abu Hamza, Omar Bakri came into the UK, let in by its liberal asylum and settlement laws at the time. Only to reward their generosity by preaching how corrup, degenerate and disgusting the host community and society was.
2. But this is exactly what William Dalrymple does in India. But he does it with the smiley fake friendly face of the underhand creep. His whole focus is on the evils of Hindu nationalism and Hindu fascism. Dalrymple feels greater affinity with Islamic fascism and jihad.
3. Just like ISIS attracts social misfits lile Sally-Anne Jones who would be nobodies back home, what would Dalrymple have been if he stayed in the UK? One of many wacko conspiracy theorists.
1. William Dalrymple writes how from a small office in London, the British East India company held sway over India and millions of lives. In like manner this man has somehow become the monopoly voice on India for the Hinduphobic western media.
2. Would it be acceptable for David Irving, David Duke, Robert Faurrisson, Alison Chabloz and similar types to be the dominant voice on the Holocaust? When they deny it ever happened? Same with Dalrymple. He sees Hinduism as the problem. bbc.co.uk/news/entertain…
3. This ignores the fact that many Sufis, especially Naqshbandiya were hard fanatics. Yet William ignores this as it does not fit into his agenda of painting Hindu root of all India's social issues
1. William Dalrymple can hold the Jaipur Literature Festival in India to insult and disparage that country's cultural and civilisation heritage. Joining hands with Wendy Doniger and fellow neo-imperialist Andrew Roberts, Dalrymple indulges in neo-colonialism of the Left.
2. Imagine an Indian immigrant in the UK having a festival to blame the grooming gang scandal on whites or anyone who honours Stonehenge. Imagine an Indian immigrant having a literary event to honour Anthony Blunt, Kim Philby and Guy Burgess. How would that go down?
3. Imagine an Indian immigrant to the UK hosting an international festival inviting the IRA, Chinese Communist Party, Iranian ayatollahs, and Argentinian veterans from the Falklands war to discuss how intolerant and backward the UK was.
1. India was the template. Once they could make Hindus ashamed of being Hindu in the name of 'secularism' and stopping caste oppression then it could be exported back to the west. Secularism was born in an environment that bifurcated profane and sacred.
2. Secularism was both a reaction to the church and grew out of it. It never applied to India where even the western colonial construct of Hinduism as opposed to Hindu culture and civilisation is totally innacurrate and and should be re evaluated.
3. In India 'secularism' is defined as anything no-Hindu. Hence the rush to shave off Vanavasis, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists from the Hindu label so they can benefit from minority status. Secularism means supporting sharia law in the name of minority rights.
1. Indian call centre scam is notorious. Someone calls up with fake English name and says they are from tech compnay, selling financial stuff, or mobile phones. This is all to get you to hand over bank details
2. But this scam is also manifest in political and academic sphere. Calling Indian anti-Hindu types such as Priyamvada Gopal and Meena Dhanda as leftist, marxist or woke is therefore innacurate. You find they have no actual political loyalty but are running a scam.
3. They claim to be socialist and concerned about the oppressed. Yet they live in the leafiest affluent areas, treat people they consider lower than them as muck, ensure their children attend the most elite schools, rage against capitalism while living in UK, USA, etc.
1. The CAA and CAB were fast track asylum for refugees coming to India fleeing persecution in neighbouring Islamic states of Pakistan, Bangldesh and Afghanistan. This meant Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist minorities who are legally oppressed.
2. Yet the mainstream media backed by India's so called secularists jumped on this as evidence of yet more anti-Muslim discrimination by India's right wing fascist Hindu government. Why for example were not Shias and Ahmadiyyas given the same fast track asylum?
3. Ahmadiyyas in particular are singled out for persecution in Pakistan, suffering deadly attacks. Shias also suffer to a lesser extent. Hence the law was held to be against Muslims.