Divine planning
On concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam strongest Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity additional affidavit in SC bringing on record the greatest devotional contribution of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community in resolving Art 363 #Kantara dispute filed
The concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam will be remembered hundreds of years into future as the day when devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community with origin in TN was highlighted by Deities for their dharmik fight to restore Shri Rama in Constitution
The concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam day of strongest additional affidavit of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity will be remembered for ensuring victory of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal devotional community with origin in TN and ensuring recognition all over Bharat
In response to this strong Deity additional affidavit we hope Hon'ble UP CM Shri @myogiadityanath ji who participated in the concluding day of Kashi Tamil Sangamam will ensure truth spoken by Hon'ble PM on Ruler status of Deities is supported
The great interpretation of our Constitution secured through devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal (SC) community with origin in TN is supported
The victory of dharma in Art 363 #Kantara dispute celebrated through Shri Rama Digvijay Yatra that Hon'ble CM Shri @myogiadityanath ji had participated is acknowledged in SC in resp to affidavit even if it means junking wrong official opinion of Centre on Art 363 #Kantara dispute
In this fight between people who want Constitution with Shri Rama (Constitutional Rama Rajya) vs people who want Constitution without Shri Rama (Constitutional Morality doctrine of Sabarimala) UP State historic opportunity to take side of Dharma of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community
The response of UP State to Deity additional affidavit will be keenly watched by all devotees of Shri Rama Raja who desire a Constitution with Shri Rama and we hope that the spirit of emblem सत्यमेव जयते also part of Constitutional Rama Rajya will be the guiding spirit in resp
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why this imp but so far unrevealed GYAN about significance of Shri Rama, Seetadevi and Lakshmana picture in original constitution and its link to emblem of SC यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः given in GYANVAPI matter by Shri Rama Raja after revealing His Ruler Status?
Shri Rama Raja of Orchha revealed His status as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) a fact acknowledged by Hon'ble CM of Madhya Pradesh similar to how status of Shri Kashi Vishwanath was acknowledged by Hon'ble PM settling Art 363 dispute which was filed in previous affidavit in same matter
A bit of historic research will reveal fact that both Gyanvapi and Shri Krishna Mathura temple demolished by Aurangzeb had been renovated/rebuilt using the property belonging to Shri Rama Raja of Orchha hence the below guidance to SC by Shri Rama Raja Deity in the Gyanvapi matter
"..Obligation of Thrippadidanam is inherited by this Hon’ble Court & it is how picture of Shri Rama, Seetadevi and Lakshmana in Original Constitution Part III page is to be understood...Art 26 is Antaratma of our Constitution which governs outcome as per emblem यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः"
...of such matters brought before this Hon’ble Court when read with the obligation of Thrippadidanam inherited by this Hon’ble Court and of the Oath taken by Hon’ble Judges and meaning of GOD explained by Dr Ambedkar.."
The affidavit ends with the important advise of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity in Koorma form which is part of Art 363 dispute papers already filed in previous additional affidavit.
The official opinion of Centre on Art 363 #Kantara dispute which is in violation of its own counsel position on rights of Prince of Arcot also Hon'ble PM Dec 13th view in Kashi of Deity Ruler status cannot be sustained anymore in light of strong affidavit
The entire Mewar Constitution is also filed which in itself nullifies the wrong official Centre's legal opinion. Hope UP State junks this and adopts the interpretation secured through devotional efforts of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community also filed in SC
A copy of important additional affidavit filed after securing guidance of Hon'ble former Chief Justice Venkatachaliah ji has been sent request Hon'ble MP Shri @DrRanjithReddy garu to also secure official support of Telangana State
The last seven decades culminating in Shri Rama Digvijay Yatra celebrating victory of dharma in Art 363 #Kantara dispute can be described as journey of the Constitution with Shri Rama to Constitution without Shri Rama and back except as Bharat:India 2.0 Constitutional Rama Rajya
Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community has played a pivotal role both in the beginning of the 👆 journey and in the end of the 👆 journey
"If God is banished from this "Ram Rajya", India will become Ayodhya without Ram "
Sentiment expressed in Constituent Assembly.
Interesting that in this seven decades journey we have banished God (Shri Rama) from Constitution & He has reentered by raising Art 363 #Kantara dispute
We request State of Telangana and State of UP where large number of Shri Rama bhakthas live to articulate their views on the above important issue of interpretation of our Constitution so we can appraise SC after we file our additional affidavit
The Centre will also have an opportunity to officially disown the wrong legal opinion on Art 363 #Kantara dispute and support the view expressed by Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji in Kashi
Dear Devotees we are in process to file final additional affidavit in gyanvapi matter in SC to bring on record great Art 363 #Kantara dispute resoln Ramayana interpretation secured end of Shri Rama Digvijay Yatra.
UP State will have to let SC know which interpretation it supports
UP State will have to let SC know in resp to👆 additional affidavit whether it supports Constitutional Rama Rajya interpretation or Constitutional Morality doctrine Sabarimala interpretation i.e Constitution with Shri Rama or Constitution without Shri Rama
Different yardsticks for agreement with Prince of Arcot and agreement with Shri Rama cannot be applied is being brought on record before SC which wrong official opinion of Centre did on Art 363 #Kantara dispute