Tomorrow is Putin's visit to Belarus. Speculation is that Putin wants Lukashenko to turn over the reins and fold Belarus into Russia proper and thereby give Putin control of the Belarussian Army to aid in a planned spring offensive. So far Luka has rather adroitly avoided ealier
attempts to write himself off the center stage, can he do it this time? What changes if he can't? Russia is already using Belarus to train troops, launch missiles and of course the failed drive on Kyiv was staged from there. Additionally, the Belarussian Army has been giving
Russia its stocks of artillery ammo and reserve tanks (and presumably other AFV's). I'm not at all convinced that the Belarussian's would fight even if Luka joined the war or Belarus ceased to exists as an "independent" state. Those troops watched the Russian Army come fleeing
back from the failed invasion of Northern Ukraine and they saw the hospitals swamped with dead and dying Russians. They are not stupid mobiks from Siberia with no access to good information. They saw the carnage firsthand and many can listen to Western Media sources. Its also
highly likely that they know how Russia treats colonial troops from the Eastern part of Russia and the poor dammed souls conscripted from the occupied areas of Ukraine. Its a one-way ride and what equipment they have now is all they get. Everything else has been stripped out and
sent to arm Russians. There won't be any air support, artillery will be starved of ammunition and when a Russian makes them a 200 the families will get a big fat Russian 0. Yet for all this Putin seems to think bullet magnets will win him the war. It sure seems to be the dominant
use of troops in Bakhmut. So 2-300K Russian troops plus an equal number of Belarussian troops can't be ignored. This is why General Zaluzhnyi is holding back new units he has been building for months. He has to use what is up now to hold the line and conduct his winter
counter offensive and make sure that his defenses in the North can both meet the expected attack and defeat it, but have enough left to go over to the offensive. aimed at ending the war. Russia probably can swing a spring offensive logistically, but that is it. The cookie jar
will be bare. Russian production of modern arms would not be able to keep up in peace time let alone with the added frictions of missing workers and sanctions. The west on the other hand faces no obstacle to production but will. The Russian trolls calling for peace or ending aid
to Ukraine are trying to hamstring Ukraine before Russia runs out of everything. Our politicians must stay strong. @JohnBoozman, @SenTomCotton, and @RepFrenchHill know I expect them to vote to send more, send better and send now. They know and I know you do to that I will do my
part to fill in the gaps. From bonking the Russian narratives to donating to worthwhile causes like the war fighters of the 92nd Brigade: @LibertyUkraineF, @georgian_legion and @belwarriors to organizations that support other war fighters and civilians like @MriyaAid, @U24_gov_ua
@UkraineAidOps and @3xR_team. You have to do your part too. Join #NAFO become a #FELLA and bonk away and donate what you can. We must stay the course for Ukraine. The thaws will start in about two months time and Europe will be out of the worst of it. Spring blooms will herald
Russian defeat. Until Ukraine Wins On Ukraine's Terms: Slava Ukraini! @mfa_russia <--- still losing: generations, credibility, relevance....

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Raver: NAFO's official polemist, Slava Ukraini!

Raver: NAFO's official polemist, Slava Ukraini! Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JBelcourt73

Dec 20
Since the era of WWII combat leaders turned political leaders has moved into the history books, can anyone think of a modern western leader who would visit areas under shell fire? Maybe Bush 43 if he could get the SS to budge. Several visited Kyiv when there was a threat of
missile strikes but not the massed fire of guns and risk of snipers and a risk of breakthroughs leading to capture. Although I have no doubt that the Ukrainian security services did their best to make the area as safe as possible the risk is never zero. The risk is never zero yet
President Zelenskyy went anyway to be seen, hand out medals and if only for a moment share some of the risk in a way that few political leaders would dare.
Read 16 tweets
Dec 19
Bleh, Fellas down. hacking and coughing but its not covid. Feels like I am gargling razors and with a mild fever I can't get warm. No @MriyaReport for me today it hurts to talk. Just gonna curl up with the puppers and a bag of Halls and try and get warm. Still my life is easy
compared to the Ukrianians suffering uder relentless Russian air attack. Imagine being sick and having no power? Add in being old/ child and the threat of an explosive Christmas Present from Kramputin. If there is any consolation I can offer the people of Kyiv is that your
Christmas weekend will be warmer than mine. Friday we are not supposed to get out of the teens (f) (-8c) with a low of 5f (-15c) and windchills as cold as (-28c) in Central Arkansas. Still that is much more bearable if you have power. At this point its obvious that Russia is
Read 12 tweets
Dec 18
So with the refusal of the Biden Admin to release the JFK documents the tin hatters are going crazy. So what is being hidden? Put on the tinfoil and I'll explain what I think and why. Shiny side out, ready set go. It was the Soviet's, or at least had KGB involvement. Oswald was
a communist who had defected to the USSR and then came back. The Soviet's thought we would blame them and Khrushchev could not call LBJ fast enough to drop the 4D's on him. Ever since that phone call everything about the assassination was deemed top secret at the highest levels.
The recent veto by the CIA says the CIA knows who was responsible and the only actor active then and active now is Russia/USSR. Everyone else is dead and gone. Given the heightened tensions with Russia today revealing that they killed an American president would be a radical
Read 4 tweets
Dec 17
Yesterday I talked about Genera Zaluzhnyi and it turns out today I need to talk about another general. I had no idea but today is the birthday of General Vatutin. In my opinion he was the best commander the Soviet's had during WWII. Far better than Zhukov and was the only early
commander they had who could fight the Germans to a standstill on their terms and even counter-attack. Sadly Stalin promoted him to lead the 1st Ukrainian front where he seized Kyiv from the Germans. Unfortunately for him, he was not seen as a liberator but as just another
invader and in Feb of 1944 the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) killed him. The UPA was born in the 1920's and fought for Ukrainian indepedence from Poles, Russians and Germans. The Soviets did not finally extinguish it until the 1950's but some veterans survived and live among us
Read 17 tweets
Dec 16
So recently Gen Zaluzhnyi gave an interview in which he said a few things of things of note. 1. He expects an attack from Belarus in the Spring. 2. Ukriane has a winter offensive getting ready to kick off and 3. He needs the equivalent of two divisional sets of heavy equipment.
To the first point, if he is serious that he expects an attack out of Belarus in the spring this will tie down significant Ukrainian forces. If he expects a 100-200K strong invasion force he has to match that. The old adage is the attacker needs 3x what the defender needs but
applies only when the battle is joined. Until then the attacker has the advantage because he only has to be strong where he wants to attack, while the defender must be strong enough everywhere he might attack. This is why demonstration forces can tie down such large numbers of
Read 22 tweets
Dec 15
Today's topic is a bit dirty so put on your muck boots. Most of us have seen pictures or video of American forward operating bases in Afghanistan and Iraq. Everything from small encampments trying to keep observation on a valley to bigger bases with mobile Burger Kings and PX
stores. We've never seen an American or allied soldier hungry or freezing and haven't since Korea. America has always been able to sustain its troops in large part because we had permissive environments. Permissive is not a word to use in Ukraine. First the sheer density of air
defense systems and relative scarcity of rotary wing aircraft make the US model impossible even on a small scale and scale matters. Hundreds of thousands of men are fighting in Ukraine and tens of thousands are on the front lines. Each and every one of them needs a lot of food,
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(