“These lawsuits are attempts to subject businesses to liability to solve a societal problem—regardless of fault, who caused the harm, whether the elements of the tort are met, or even if the liability will actually address the issue.”#LitigationNarrative atra.org/wp-content/upl…
“In recasting the litigation under public nuisance law, lawyers hoped to circumvent the responsibility of individuals. Richard Scruggs, a renowned former plaintiffs’ attorney, explained that the legal theories most likely to resonate are those that “do not hinge on fault,” but..
..are based simply on the fact that these entities made money selling opioids. Their success will depend on “whether the plaintiffs can muster sufficient legal, political and public relations pressure to force a settlement.”
Greedy law-firms created a public nuisance by poisoning the hearts & minds of Americans against people with pain by using propaganda that associates rx opioids w/criminality,defect, & death. Belief bias now circumvents attempts to reconcile harm for already marginalized ppl.
When ppl w/pain attempt to advocate for access to opioids, take a look at the abuse that ensues. Does this remind you of past campaigns by the US govt? Nixon’s spirit is alive and well amongst the rich and powerful that maintain ridiculous wealth b/c of the drug war. #TortReform
One example of the games these law-firms are playing with PR: Earlier someone was railing on a politician for Sackler-related activities (from TN). I asked for proof. I was told to do a search. What’s interesting is law-firms had written politicized pieces that came up.
So I searched Marsha Blackburn Purdue. This article came up in the Tennessean. The author? A local attorney, seemingly concerned about getting answers related to Marsha’s part in the “opioid crisis”. The date was July 2018.
Last article, where she bows to the pressure created by the 60 mins and WAPO hit pieces, created by expert witnesses, DEA, & law firms. 60 mins is well-known in the litigation realm as the place to drum up public outrage. Adolf would be impressed, y’all. tennessean.com/story/news/pol…
Remember that first article I posted, that was written by the concerned TN attorney? You probably guessed that his law-firm had a huge $ interest in this. In fact, they’d just filed suit a few months earlier! Just amazing timing for that piece to come out. bloomberg.com/press-releases…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Prediction 8/24-Scheme: Calley Means, the Andrew Kolodny of wellness healthcare venture capital is the PR lead. Trump will appoint RFKjr to lead the White House Chronic Disease Commission. Dr.Casey Means, Dr Drew, Jillian Michaels, Ron Johnson, Peter McCullough👈🏻the panel. 🧵
⬆️ modeled after the White House Opioid Commission, led by Chris Christie (who sits on the board of a non-op!oid pharma co that was also invited), the committee will invite companies to be involved in the solutions/report, & they’ll make millions.
At the same time, mass tort firms will sue the deep pocket processed food industry, which will create more funds to go into state coffers & public health offices, while creating liability for companies that make processed foods.
Calley will win as whistleblower & as consultant.
What only a handful of ppl have caught on to, is that MDL litigation where govt is lead lead plaintiff, is being done to get around the lawful rule-making process, installing backdoor regs & causing bankruptcies, that limit free-market choice, thru settlement injunctions.
The big 3 opioid settlement injunctions have caused massive problems with pts not being able to get their essential medications at pharmacies, due to the settlement agreement saying companies must put strict thresholds on what pharmacies can order. It’s TYRANNICAL RATIONING.
This well-oiled litigation machine is churning out for-profit litigation at record rates, securing wealth transfers based on frivolous lawsuits. Why does that matter? B/c the plaintiffs bar IS LYING, so settlements will CAUSE harm b/c the problems weren’t there to begin with.
I’ve wondered why Natl Harm Redux coalition & DPA w/partnered with a film & outreach program that promotes re-installing the 2016 cdc gls (according to leader Jamie Boyle) & publicizing a stigmatizing film aimed at demonizing rx opioids, while advocating for safe injection sites.
I wonder if it has anything to do with the fact these two sit on the board of directors for Natl HR Coalition. Also, DPA NY has long supported Alexis Pleus from TruthPharm, who helped Nan with her Sackler litigation publicity stunts. These groups are harming ppl who use drugs.
I was told that DPA is normally an “ally” to the pain/disability community. I was also told they have ppl that have joined their group that have been harmed by Purdue. I wonder why there’s a distinction b/t street initiation bs rx initiation and why they have a double standard.
“Winning the War on Opioids: A Behind the Scenes Look at The Largest and Most Complex Deal In The History of Jurisprudence”
-or
“How US DOJ & Trial Lawyers circumvented public consent to create a work-around ban on rx opioids thru mass tort litigation.”levinlaw.com/2021/07/21/win…
“A nationwide solution. If you impose serious restrictions in one community, but not the next, offenders simply move their operations. By getting all states & all communities on board, it created a truly nationwide solution to a public health crisis.”
-mass rx restrictions 🤔
“This reform package includes the creation of a groundbreaking clearinghouse through which the Big Three will be required to account not only for their own shipments, but also the shipments of the other distributors, in order to detect, stop, and report suspicious orders.”
So I figured out why Barry was so intent on obfuscating the pain pts’ complaints about his reporting: he’s a niche investigative journalist that covers big class-action litigation, seemingly erring on the side of plaintiffs, which includes billion $ firms. #LitigationNarrative
Also really interesting afa #BarryMeier and his relationship with the prosecutor in the 2007 Purdue case. https://t.co/SlfSdCjSXEstatnews.com/2018/06/06/oxy…
Roughly a year before Meier was tipped off about Oxycontin’s marketing issues, Barry wrote this strange little bit about Ron Motley Esq, who won big with the tobacco litigation, & went on to hire PROP member(s) as expert witnesses for opioid litigation. https://t.co/c7Z78XZXvNnytimes.com/1999/11/14/bus…
The real cause of the opioid related death explosion isn’t initial exposure to opioids. It’s separating ppl from their safer supply, be it from a MD or from a street source. Going after pharma/supply only made this worse b/c then the solution was to cut everyone off and stop RXs.
@US_Muckraker So IOW, when cops and public health depts (cause they’re partnered now in this endeavor) take out ppl supplying the drugs they deem “highly addictive”, they’re not just trying to ruin the lives of the “dealer” figure, they’re openly aiming to hurt the end recipient of the drug.
@US_Muckraker I find it shocking that so many supposed liberal ppl in medicine (that will be all about BLM, etc) are actually fostering a framework that was used for slavery as far as medical paternalism. The harm principle honors individuals own bodily autonomy, as long as others aren’t hurt.