#RBT countries understand "saving clause" to protect the internal tax base. Bc of @citizenshiptax + #FATCA US uses "saving clause" to BOTH PROTECT internal tax base + EXPAND tax base by claiming people with @taxresidency in other countries as US taxpayers. taxconnections.com/taxblog/croati…
Both OECD + UN Treaties include a "saving clause" which "saves" right of a country to tax its "residents". All countries (including the US) make "residency" a sufficient condition for @taxresidency. Only the US has @citizenshiptax. Hence, "saving clause" speaks only of residents.
The evolution of the "saving clause" found in US Tax Treaties is VERY (really) interesting. Watch how they become tighter over time. Here is paragraph 3 of Article 4 of the 1973 US Romania Tax Treaty. It applies to (1) "residents" (as defined by treaty) and (2) "citizens".
Next step is to expand "saving clause" beyond current "citizen" or "resident". An early example is 1982 Australia treaty defining "citizen" to include a former citizen who expatriated to avoid taxation. Note this expansion does NOT include permanent residents and is for 10 years.
Looking for more. In Par 3 of Art 1 of the 1992 Russia treaty, the saving clause allows the US to tax it's "residents" (as defined by treaty) current citizens and FORMER citizens without regard to why they are former citizens. Notice that "former residents" are excluded.
Denmark paragraph 4 of Article 1: By 2000 both former "long term residents" and "former citizens" are included for a period of ten years: if "loss of such status had as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of tax" (who can prove that?).
Moving on: The 2016 US Model Tax Treaty reflected in 2022 US Croatia Tax Treaty removes all limitations and the treaty partners agree that the US will be granted full taxing rights, without limitation over current "residents" or "citizens" and FORMER "residents" or "citizens".
#FATCA of the matter: The "saving clause" found in US Croatia Tax Treaty allows US to impose full tax on US "residents", "citizens", "former residents" and "former citizens". This is how a "saving clause" in the context of @citienship tax expands the US tax base outside the US.
The "saving clause" and #FATCA extend US @citizenshiptax into other countries. The US claims those with @taxresidency in other countries as US tax residents. No sovereign country should agree to a tax treaty that includes "citizenship" in "saving clause". americanexpatfinance.com/opinion/item/2…
The "saving clause" is commonly understood through a framework that assumes #RBT and NOT @citizenshiptax. By focusing on the protection of the domestic tax base, there is a failure to recognize how #CBT + #FATCA extend the US tax base to other countries. taxsummaries.pwc.com/united-states/…
The idea of the "saving clause" extending US tax rules into other countries is well explained in the article by @FixTheTaxTreaty which succinctly summarizes the problem ... fixthetaxtreaty.org/problem/saving…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Richardson - Counsellor for US persons abroad

John Richardson - Counsellor for US persons abroad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExpatriationLaw

May 8
Biden 2025 Green Book contains proposals exacerbating impact of US @citizenshiptax on #Americansabroad by creating @doubletaxation. Do NOT be fooled by references to "High Income" and "Wealthy". Reform of "taxation of capital income" = trouble for all! home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
Image
The 2025 Green Book repeats proposals in 2024, 2023 and 2022. For "some" of the impacts on #Americansabroad see this 2022 post from @VLJeker us-tax.org/2022/04/21/par…

Image
Image
Notice also the extension of and raising the NIIT #Americanabroad with small businesses (including local businsess of #expats. Clear @doubletaxation bc the NIIT (generally) cannot be used as a credit against US taxes. home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 29
This will be interesting. The larger issue is how the meaning of the treaty is to be determined and whether the US Treasury is the one to determine that meaning. But, it’s clear that USA has declared war on French residents afflicted/disabled by U.S. citizenship.
USA is arguing that US/France tax treaty should be interpreted to REQUIRE @doubletaxation if France dares to tax investment income sourced in France and received by US citizens (property) resident in France. Treaty #savingclause used to create #doubletax and not avoid it.
The US gov’s brief is mind blowing claiming (inter Alia) that to allow an FTC on French source income would (because of the FEIE which doesn’t apply to invest income) give #expats a double benefit. taxnotes.com/research/feder…
Read 7 tweets
Apr 19
Congratulations to @MonteSilver1 and @GOPIsrael - the #GILTI lawsuit remains alive!! news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-repo…
The oral argument in Monte Silver v. IRS (definitely worth listening to) is here ... courtlistener.com/audio/89880/mo…
In the April 19/24 decision in @MonteSilver1 v The IRS the USCA remanded the case to the District Court to reconsider the applicability of the South Carolina v Regen case. Full decision is here ... taxnotes.com/research/feder…
Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9
Interesting analysis from @DanNeidle. Example of the use of procedural rules to avoid analyzing what the #FATCA IGAs are really about (especially in application to UK residents). Should the UK really allow the US, to claim UK residents as US taxpayers? taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/03/08/sec…
@DanNeidle Par 5 of ruling Judge makes factual mistakes: 1. #FATCA IGAs are NOT US "treaties". 2. US tax authorities do NOT transfer information on "US citizens resident in the UK". Transfer is on individuals RESIDENT in UK (not citizens) who hold accounts in US!. assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2024/5…
Image
Par. 4 includes acknowledgement that #FATCA IGAs apply to accounts held by UK RESIDENTS who are US citizens. IGAs do NOT apply to US residents who are UK citizens. Hence, US receives UK account info about people who live in UK and do NOT live in the US! assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2024/5…
Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 18, 2023
Looking forward: @Keith__REDMOND, @IRS_MEDIC and @Expatriationlaw discuss the US #PFIC rules. Interestingly @RonWyden in his "Billionaires (so called) Tax Act" is applying PFIC (as applied to #Americansabroad) to resident Americans.
Similarity to #PFIC 1: @RonWyden's "Billionaires Tax Act" imposes an annual "mark to market" tax on "tradable" (think publicly traded stocks) assets. Pay tax without an actual sale ... finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Image
Similarity to #PFIC 2: @RonWyden's "Billionaires Tax Act" imposes a deferral charge on "non-tradable" WHEN they are sold. This is the attribution of income to somebody when they have not received income and charges interest on the #fakeincome. finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Image
Read 20 tweets
Nov 29, 2023
When it comes to the Moore @USTransitionTax MRT case (to be argued Dec. 5/23) there is almost no agreement on what the case is even about (reflected in the statements of the interviewees.) Some thoughts on what was said ... cnb.cx/3QRdSfu
@USTransitionTax 1. Earnings accumulated before 2017 by CFCs were NOT "deferred". They were earnings of a non-US corp, that were not taxable by the US as per US tax law. There was never ANY obligation to bring those earnings into the US tax system. The TJCA created both new income and a new tax!
@USTransitionTax 2. Suggestion that CFCs were (prior to 2017) "pass through entities" is wrong. Subpart F was created precisely because CFCs are were not "pass through". The CFC was a separate legal entity that the US (as per treaties) was prohibited from taxing (except US source income).
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(