Share this page!

Hicksy Profile picture
Twitter logo
Dec 21 • 4 tweets • 2 min read
Have you written to your MP about the petition below?

Petition: Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 v@cc!ne$
buff.ly/3gS80o7

If yes, please tag your MP here.
If they have responded please share their reply.
If you haven't written & need help with wording, link here
docs.google.com/document/d/1-w…

#MHRAFromWatchdogToEnabler
@Keir_Starmer
No MP tags from the yeses, let's make sure they know we want an answer

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Hicksy

Hicksy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @hicksyalex

Hicksy Profile picture
Dec 22
Thread: JCVI made a statement on 7th April 2021 to offer alternatives to @AstraZeneca for under 30s
They made the decision on 1st April, was the Easter Bank Holiday sufficient reason to delay the announcement by 6 days? Image
How many injuries & deaths could have been prevented with an earlier announcement?
gov.uk/government/pub…
@MHRAgovuk recommended no age restrictions on the same day!
gov.uk/government/new…
Why was this decision made by JCVI not @MHRAgovuk?
Safety is @MHRAgovuk's responsibility, why didn't they act?
Why was there a a conflict in the @MHRAgovuk & JCVI advice?
Why was the announcement for under 30s only, when other countries withdrew for under 40s or entirely, much earlier? Image
Read 11 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Dec 22
People under 40 were 💉 for the benefit of others, NOT THEMSELVES.
This is from JCVI minutes from 1st April 2021
m.box.com/shared_item/ht…
JCVI believed these people living with immunocompromised people should take @AstraZeneca for the benefit of others, despite no personal risk!👇 Image
"For people under the age of 40 years who were household contacts ofimmunocompromised individuals the committee agreed that they shouldcontinue to be offered the AZ vaccine. 👇
It was noted that these individuals werebeing vaccinated for the benefit of someone else therefore the risk/benefit would need to be very clear for them, as they were not personally at risk"
Read 5 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Dec 21
Were @moderna_tx bivalent boosters found to be more or less effective against infection than the original covid vaccines?
Less effective!
Why did @MHRAgovuk approve them?
Petition: Launch a Public Inquiry into the approval process for covid-19 vaccines petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6281…
Read 4 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Dec 21
Why are so many JCVI minutes missing?
Why are lots very late & not in the order of the meetings?
Why were the minutes of the meeting relating to @AstraZeneca withdraw for under 40s deleted & republished?
Why is so much information unpublished due to "commercial confidence"?
👇
Why is commercial confidence allowed to take precedence over public interest?
Especially given @AstraZeneca has killed so many people.

Minutes here:
m.box.com/shared_item/ht…
Read 4 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Dec 21
It appears that @moderna_tx BA.4/5 boosters are even less effective than BA1 boosters & the original vaccines.
Moderna BA.1 Bivalent vaccine phase 3 trials already evidenced lower efficacy than the original, these appear worse.
Moderna BA.4/5 trial report only includes covid infection data for BA.4/5, not the original, however comparing to the BA.1 report it shows they were significantly higher:
BA.4/5: 3.3%
BA.1: 2.5%
Original: 2.4%.
CDC definition infection rates are even more significant:
BA.4/5: 1.6%
BA.1: 1.1%
Original: 0.5%
They have censored the data of infection rate for those previously uninfected, there were significant differences between these groups in the BA.1 trial: BA.1: 3.2% Original: 1.9%.
Why have they censored the data?
Read 8 tweets
Hicksy Profile picture
Dec 19
This video from @WHO is sinister.

It is clearly to psychologically manipulate people to turn against those they label as "anti-vaxers".
"Anti-vaxers", which I call "anti-science aggression" has become a major killing force globally. ImageImageImage
They claim 200k people lost their lives for not having covid vaccines in the US.
They claim "anti-science" now kills more people than gun violence, global terrorism & nuclear proliferation. ImageImageImage
They claim it's a far right political movement, use of imagery & reference to Germany implies Nazi links, without explicitly stating it.
They claim political solutions are needed to address this.
They use aggressive images of protestors to infer violence. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(