We just discovered Caroline Ellison and Gary Wang turned on @SBF_FTX, rattling him out to the Feds. The SEC’s civil (non-criminal) complaint is built on their participation and gives us our first “insider’s account” of the FTX disaster.
I’ve given you 12 key takeaways below:👇🧵
1. It is what we thought:
• SBF lied
• Wang built a back door to FTX for Alameda to sweep funds
• Caroline ran Alameda (Sam’s personal fund)
• Sam invested in real estate, politicians, and venture capital 😅
2. 💥 Sam told me to do it
Caroline says Sam directed her to take customer funds from FTX in exchange for the made-up $FTT shitcoin. (In green highlight) This directly contradicts Sam’s repeated “I didn’t know” statements.
Despite already having “borrowed” billions and billions of FTX customer assets, by May, when crypto went bump in the night, Alameda (Sam) couldn’t fulfill its borrower obligations.
Sam ordered Caroline to take even more FTX customer money.
4. “Brazen, Multi-Year Scheme”
The violations peaked in 2022, but began years ago…from the start of FTX. This wasn’t a recent accident. It was a multi-year fraud.
5. Sam and Gary Own 100% of Alameda
Anytime someone says “Alameda,” just substitute “Sam.”
Sam owns 90% of Alameda and Gary 10%. Alameda has no clients - all that money is Sam and Gary’s, stolen fair and square.
6. Sam was ALWAYS in Control
Even after naming Caroline and Sam Trabucco as Co-CEOs of Alameda in 2021, Sam remained in absolute control.
He frequently communicated with Alameda peeps and had full access to its books and records.
Alameda *IS* Sam, so this makes sense.
7. Alameda (Sam) was Exempted from FTX’s Risk Management Process
As has been widely discussed, FTX had a decent risk-engine, it just didn’t apply to its biggest user: Sam himself (via Alameda).
At least Sam posted high-quality SamCoins - $FTT - as collateral. 😅
8. Sam CREATED Alameda’s Deal and Took Actions to Hurt FTX
Over $8 BILLION of customer funds were wired by customers DIRECTLY TO ALAMEDA rather than FTX.
Eight. Billion.
This was a de facto loan. Sam ensured Alameda (Sam) did NOT have to pay FTX interest on that money.
9. Securities Fraud
Among the many frauds Sam et al committed was the securities fraud.
The SEC frowns on poorly written footnotes. Imagine how it treats you lying to would-be investors about your fraud to raise fresh equity.
“Fraud squared,” or something.
10. Magic Money in a Box was a “Security”😬
SamCoins, ShitCoins, Web3 “tokens,” magic beans. Call em what you want, but they’re entirely fabricated from dreams.
And Sam lied about them.
A lot.
And they “manipulated” the price of $FTT.
And the SEC declares it a security.👀
Quick Aside (unrelated to FTX): if tokens are securities, many, MANY people broke the law. Entrepreneurs, promoters, and - yikes! - prominent venture capitalists. I’d watch out here. We may see VCs in handcuffs…
11. Undocumented Personal Loans in the Billions
If you have your fund “borrow” customer brokerage assets, then “lend” those from your fund to yourself, but you don’t document the loan, is it even a loan? Doesn’t that just make it money laundering?
Say it with me: “RICO.”
12. FTX Customers Withdrew $5 Billion in ONE DAY 😮
It also had history’s all-time least surprising $8 billion shortfall. Oops!
End:
That’s the SEC civil complaint summary - the criminal complaints will have more.
The most fascinating part to me is the implications beyond FTX’s shores (see the “Quick Aside” before #11).
Capital One is a bellwether for the middle-class American consumer.
It sees who is spending what, where, and when.
$COF reported earnings today, providing early data that both supports and challenges the narratives around consumer behavior after Liberation Day.
🧵👇 1/x
2. Consumer Spending
Trends were stable through 3/31, but since then:
- iPhones: very modest consumer electronics "pull forward" $AAPL
- Autos: noteworthy spend uptick as consumers try to "get ahead of tariff impacts."
- Travel & Entertainment: T&E spend "growth" is easing, especially airlines (unclear if this means overall spend is down or it's growing slower)
3. Macro Forecast
Despite Q1 consumer credit performance being above previous expectations, $COF assumes a negative impact in its go-forward modeling and is watching "very very closely" to see if it's being conservative enough.
It chose to release less from allowances than it otherwise would have, due to "downside economic risks and greater uncertainty."
On the surface, the deal values @X flat to Twitter’s 2022 takeout value, despite massive underperformance on financial metrics.
Sounds like a win of sorts for X shareholders… 🥇
…BUT 1/x 🧵👇
…it is a stock deal and X owners will now own 29% of combinedco, shifting from a near-pureplay social media bet in a HIGHLY strategic asset to an AI bet that’s very much on the cum plus a diluted share in Twitter.
Yes, xAI is a powerful model.
But not unusually so.
2/x
xAI has de minimis revenue, is hemorrhaging cash, & its prospective business opportunity seems VERY difficult given the relevant competition:
a) has a head start;
b) is murderers row; and
c) has existing business and GTM strategies to build on.
3/x
Today we learned while the voice of the people may be the voice of the gods, in Delaware there’s only one true god:
And her name is Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick. 1/x 🧵👇
Below is a brief thread breaking down her denial of Elon’s request for $55 billion in $TSLA stock.
2. Her original January 2024 ruling highlighted several flaws in the years old shareholder vote that was meant to award Elon massive stock compensation, if he delivered massive value to $TSLA shareholders.
Her determination wiped out Musk’s entire equity grant, stating Tesla failed to follow required procedures, which invalidated the original vote from years ago to grant the compensation package.
3. Tesla asked her to review her ruling.
Then, this past summer, Tesla held a new shareholder vote to (re)affirm the prior flawed compensation package.
Today’s 103 page decision responded to that request AND was meant to decide how much the plaintiffs’ lawyers should be paid.
Mrs. B founded Nebraska Furniture Mart in 1937 with $500 of savings, selling 90% to Warren Buffett’s $BRK 50 years later for $55 million.
Even at 94-years old, she continued to work 70 hour weeks, pricing rugs and carpets from memory. 🧵👇
“We like managers who are in love with their business…who feel like I do - I want to tap dance when I get to the office,” is how Buffett answered Adam Smith’s question about the Berkshire Hathaway culture. 1/x
Mrs B barely spoke English when she started NFM; she sought a $75 business loan and was denied.
50 years later, what did she think of the doubters?
“I still hate them. Anybody who does you dirty, you should never forgive and forget.” ☠️
- Rose Blumkin at 94 years young
Mrs. B had uncommon sense:
“God blessed me: anything I do, I make money.”
Mrs. B’s daughter on growing up:
“The customer was God - that came first and we came next,” she laughingly shared.