It's a well known fact that the history of Shivaji the great hero of BJP/RSS/Congress/Subaltern Shudras is marred by his questionable parentage.
Shivaji was born during many years of estrangement between Jijabai and Shahaji. Was he a child of (Jijabai's?) passion and with whom?
According to the contemporary (1666) biography of Shiva "ji", by Cosme De Guarda titled "Vida e Acçoens do famoso e felicissimo Sevagy", he was stated to be the son of Dom Manoel de Menezes, the person who was the overlord of the place where Jijabai lived during her estrangement.
With the help of a friend not anymore on twitter, I got my hands on probably the oldest copy of any work on Shiva"ji", which dates back to 1730, 150+ years before Marathi regional chauvinists like Phule and Tilak created his fake hype.
1730 cc of the original (Use Google Lens).
During the same period, Father Navarette who came to India in 1670 wrote that Shiva"Ji" was born a Mughal, the same was said by another work from 1677 titled "Relation ou Journal d'un voyage fait aux Indes Orientales"
The English Factory OTOH, wrongly called Shiva"Ji" a Rajput.
We have to understand that this part of Shiva Ji being a Rajput is a common misconception and false propaganda spread by Marathas and most subaltern classes by associating themselves with the Rajputs.
This practice of Subaltern/Non-Rajput classes is what's called Rajputization.
As you can see, Shiva Ji's official father Shah Ji in a letter to Sultan Adil Shah according to the work Radha Madhav Vilas Champu says "आम्ही तों रजपूत", meaning I am a Rajput.
At the same time these could very well be forged documents.
Regardless, he was not a Rajput.
At the same time we find in the book by James Laine a popular Marathi discourse that the real father of Shiva Ji was Dadaji Konddev - his Brahmin guardian, who also lived during Shah Ji's estrangement with Jijabai.
The logic given is the same as that for Dom Manoel de Menezes.
So who was real the father of Shiva Ji?
His official father Shah Ji, Dom Manoel de Menezes, a Mughal, a Rajput or the Brahmin Dadaji Konddeo. We may never know, since all research on him is restricted by Subaltern Politics.
OTOH it's the Ambedkarite Contstitution that inhibits any innovation. Indians succeed at innovating OUTSIDE India but not in India because R&D requires money that GoI wastes on SC/ST/OBC while taking taxes from the UC.
The former is incapable and the latter is incapacitated.
India's identity and obsession with Social Engineering is the primary reason. Everything is interpreted as an intersectional function of the Sociology of it all.
Remember innovation stopped in the US ever since Diversity Politics and Affirmative Action took hold.
Now imagine Modern India which only has had Political False Gods like Phule, Tilak, Savarkar, Ambedkar and Nehru, detached from all material aspect of the problem and focussed solely on the Sociological Contortioning of India's very being, even this thread by Mandal is the same.
Can Marathis be anything except civilisational frauds and thieves? Well, can't expect much from these Avarna-Shudras, their whole existence is of false claims by Shah-ji, Shiva-ji, Jotirao Phule, promoted by missionaries.
Now editing a famous historical painting to their agenda.
According to the Smithsonian National Museum of Asian Art:
"The radiant and powerful Jahangir is depicted comforting his meek, submissive cousin, Shah Abbas of Iran. This has nothing to do with historical fact, however, and is pure wish-fulfillment on Jahangir's part." - (1/2)
"The rulers were intense rivals, the focus of their mutual antagonism centering on Qandahar, in Afghanistan, a territory and fortress under Mughal control." - (2/2)
Artist: Abu'l Hasan (b. 1588/1589)
Borders: Muhammad Sadiq
Extract from the memorandum on Ahir Regiment jointly submitted by Provincial Yadava (Gopa) Mahasabha and All-India Yadava Mahasabha on December 18, 1928.
The argument here was based on the claim of a Rajput ancestry and hence eligibility for martial services.
But But But, the Jadubansi Ahirs were limited to places like Rewari, Rohtak, Alwar and other Western States.
Only these Ahirs are considered authentic Ahirs, while the rest are an assortment of various castes, who unlike the western actual Ahirs are Gopas, Gadariyas etc.
The Gopas and Gadariyas (Lalu is a Gadariya), and other assortment of castes that now claim and Ahir status were the ones who were involved with Naxal and other terrorist movements in East India and most of the crimes that exist in UP.
These are what analysts of the Mahabharata have identified as corruptions/interpolations that appear as Bhriguisation.
Bhriguised parts are easy to identify, as the epics go off tangent in them and delve into stories of some Bhrigu hero, that fought Kshatriyas to varied results.
There is no dearth of Bhrigu Vs Kshatriya narratives that are retold in numerous ways but always from a Bhrigu PoV.
And often involve hyerboles that may include extermination of either of the races.
Often there is some kid that is left as he hides behind his mother, in the Vishnu Purana this happens with Aurva, who hid in the Uru (Thighs) of his mother to escape the wrath of a Haihaya King.
In the MBH.XII.L the Earth itself saves Kshatriyas of various races by hiding them.
But Sikhs are the darlings of the Hindutva brigade. Afterall, that 'Savior of Hindus' tag was accorded by the Marathis and their ideologues because of some story regarding saving Marathi women post Panipat 3.
Savarkar was one of the earliest proponents of Khalistan/Sikhisthan.
In a statement dated April 8, 1941, V.D. Savarkar proposed the creation of a Sikhisthan, a 'Sikh Nation' created out of the province of the then Punjab, comprising of modern day Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, of course alongside Pakistan's Punjab.
Source: Veer Savarkar's Whirlwind Propaganda
~ A.S. Bhide
The work published by Hindu Mahasabha then under Savarkar contains...
"Statements, Messages & Extracts from the President's (Savarkar's) Diary of his Propagandistic Tours - Interviews from December 1937 to October 1941"
Since he is a character of unimaginable feats, his and his feats' historicity is completely out of question, and we are not going to use the atheistic argument to discredit him.
But what we can determine is the historicity of his traditions/myths, and and their origins.
Since he is supposed to be a contemporary, and in fact much older in antiquity when compared to Lord Rama and Krishna, his traditons must also have existed prior to them, but it's not the case, he is not mentioned in any inscription prior to the medieval age in North India.