Mike Konczal Profile picture
Dec 23, 2022 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Early gift for the White House: an absolutely perfect PCE inflation print, with core at 2% (!) target. War is over, if you want it.

Many, including myself, were worried about divergence with CPI; and PCE is what the Fed actually watches. But that didn't happen.

Let's dig in. /1
To give a sense of the trend here, let's look at the 3-month core PCE rate. As Powell notes, there had no actual drop throughout the year, all the news cycle events just washing out.

Finally we see a drop. It's just two months, but it's encouraging, especially under the hood. /2
We can break PCE inflation into the three categories that Powell and other Fed officials are watching: goods in deflation, housing peaked, and the rest of services slowing. We see all; notably in services, which has a much different balance of items than CPI. /3
In general, core services ex housing - what Powell watches for wage pressures - runs hotter in PCE than CPI. This divergence jumped this month but had been elevated in 2022.

Digging into this further is an ongoing project (I got covid this week so couldn't prep this, alas). /4
Last, services aren't dragged down by imputed prices, a concern @jasonfurman and others have flagged in previous months as falling stock prices are factored into financial services.

Though this happened earlier in the year, the last three months have been in historical norms. /5
Core services still remains elevated versus pre-pandemic trend, and goods won't be in deflation forever. But the trends over the past 3 months are exactly what a "soft landing" would have predicted, and it is important for the Fed to let these positive developments play out. 6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Konczal

Mike Konczal Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mtkonczal

Jan 30
Quits and hires rate are now a notable step below 2019 levels.

Quits does better predicting labor market conditions and there's an increasing trend in job openings across the 21C. So, at this critical moment, worth weighing quits more when we are watching labor market. /1 Image
If the concern is in (wage-inertial?) services, hires and quits levels are also below there, and have been falling consistently.

There has been a lot of shifting and upgrading in the labor market during the recovery, and that process has played itself out. Time to reassess. /2 Image
If you are still focused on job openings because you think 'openings over vacancies' is a proxy for output deviations that gives a nonlinear Phillips Curve that fits this recovery, well, sorry bub, that's over. It fell off months ago.

That's not 'steep,' it just doesn't fit. /3 Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 26
6-month core PCE: 1.86%
3-month core PCE: 1.52%

A year ago these numbers were above 4 percent. I understand the yawns and the sense it's old news, but this is just a massive and wild achievement. Let's dig in and discuss the last mile and what just happened. /1 Image
Last mile: weighted contribution to overall inflation by major categories over past 6 months.

We are at 2%. Core goods pull that down about -0.5%; easy to see how to replace that. For all the fears on non-housing inflation, it's only pulling up 0.2% compared to 2018-2019. /2 Image
Here's a different version of approaching that chart. Non-housing services is volatile month-to-month, both now and before 2020.

We can debate where underlying is between 2 and 2.5 percent right now, but rates are set as if underlying is between 4 and 5 percent. Or: too high. /3 Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 11
Before we dig into an interesting upside CPI report, we now have the full 2023 data now.

And we can see, using the best proxy we have for core inflation going back to the 1940s, that 2023's disinflation looked like the post-WWII period, not the 1970-80s one. Remarkable story.
/1 Image
Big story is leveling out of core CPI inflation over the past 5 months in the low 3 percent range. I'm curious how next month's retroactive seasonal adjustment impacts this, and throughout the past years we've seen these leveling out then down shifts during the disinflation. /2 Image
We'll probably get a big round of discussion on is housing following this. There's ~4 months of housing clocking in a bit higher than the downward trajectory people had been expecting. After next month's seasonal readjustment, probably a time to dust off those models again. /3 Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 5
And there it is: even though we're well into the recovery, and have had unemployment under 4 percent for 2 full years, 2023 had the 5th highest job growth in the 21st century. (6th as a percent of employment.) Note the contrast with the 2010s below.

Let's dig into December. /1 Image
You can see job numbers having more variance over the past six months, especially coming off the big job growth the past two years. That means we should be more careful not to read too much into any one month.

And stepping back, this is the job gain rate of a soft landing. /2 Image
Some weakness in the household survey; participation and (even prime) employment rates were down a bit. Should generally go with the employer survey, but with JOLTS weaker perhaps time to pay more attention?

Either way, participation rate is higher than prepandemic estimates. /3 Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 3
Well #JOLTS was fun while it lasted. Here's quit rate vs inflation over the past ~20 years. November 2023 is hard to read, because it's so in the middle of the best values.

There's nothing to see here other than a solid labor market alongside big disinflation.

But but but... /1 Image
But but but....job openings!

Whatever relationship is there, we've completely slid off of it. We all had a blast debating whether 'the Beveridge Curve is steep so declines in v/u could come mostly from v' it....was a nonstarter? We just got the disinflation without it.

Why? /2 Image
One reason why is the openings series has a time trend. During a delirium dream I thought coding notebooks could be the new microblogs; this half-finished attempt shows time series trends in that data, including plotting the residuals of all 50 states. /3
github.com/mtkonczal/BLS-…
Read 6 tweets
Dec 31, 2023
I'm open to it, the arguments will evolve, but here's some reasons - empirical and theoretical - why I don't find the idea that a nonlinear Phillips Curve, one using job openings over unemployment for demand, is convincing against the evidence we have for disinflation in 2023. /1
My key one: The disinflation we saw was simply too big to fit into nonlinear estimates for v/u's effects.

In @GautiEggertsson paper, if I follow it correctly, you need v/u to drop from 1.9 to at least 1 to get -3% core CPI. But v/u is currently 1.5.
/2





Image
Image
Image
Image
As a reminder, we're discussing a nonlinear Phillips Curve (PC) in v/u and not u because the small increase in u can't justify our disinflation.

To have u going from 3.5 to 3.9% move core CPI -3% would need a PC slope of 7.5. Most nonlinear estimates are like 0.5. Not it. /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(