Flynn's sorry-ass refusal to march to the Capitol bc it was too cold on Jan6 is hilarious for a lot of reasons, but it has significant ramifications for both the Oath Keepers and Brandon Straka.
But a lot of this also falls out from the VIP fight (the Report is a bit thin on that too, not even mentioning Flynn): Had Flynn and Stone gotten their speaking role, they likely would have marched.
The effect was likely the same (except for Straka and the Oath Keepers).
The Report relies on claims Alex Jones made on his own show for details about his movement, which makes it about as reliable as the claim that Sandy Hook victims were just crisis actors.
I can't tell you how many times TV lawyers told me Alex Jones was not a key link between the White House and the Proud Boys giving shape to the attack.
Some of those same TV lawyers discovered, for the first time, that Proud Boys marched to the Capitol before Trump spoke.
The Report chooses not to rely on Tim Kelly's ruling debunking this claim, nor does it point out that Jones went nowhere near the stage the permit of which he invoked, nor does it focus on Ali Alexander, who arranged the permits and was right there in the video.
The Report generally does well at incorporating materials from court documents into the larger whole. But it's curious that J6C chose NOT to include the part of Matthew Greene's statement of offense where he described the POINT of crowding the Capitol was to pressure Pence.
Congratulations to failed GOP Gov candidate Ryan Kelley, who delayed pleading long enough for DOJ to add this false claim to his charges, if they decide to add a felony to your charges. (He continued his case in early December to February.)
This is one of many reasons why J6C's referral of incitement of insurrection referral will go nowhere.
How did Trump incite the Proud Boys if they didn't attend his speech?
You gotta prove that OTHERS committed insurrection, and for the most part, the evidence is thinner.
This passage on Ron Loehrke relies entirely on his arrest affidavit, not video, which is unfortunate bc the #SeditionHunters did a superb video showing him directing traffic on the W side.
Also I wish J6C would ID military experience--he's a Marine.
One moment I wish they had included a picture, bc Johnny Gordon and his tats is one of my favorite rioters.
I've said a couple of times that not discussing the veterans who played key roles in the attack was a missed opportunity. Here's a report from April 2021 on about that.
Nice to start cataloging the people, like @MaryMargOlohan, who are stupid enough to take @SecRubio's false claims about what the EU fine is for seriously.
Thanks for making that clear!
Big Dick Toilet Salesman says he is stupid or a liar.
Unsurprising that Medicare fraudster @SenRickScott thinks fines for fraudulent consumer claims are censorship.
To add the confusion of the many ways Lindsey the Insurance Lawyer bolloxed her attempt to indict Jim Comey, there are actually THREE different documents.
First, what she purports is an indictment (but which was not presented to GJ in this form). Sig page looks like this.
The sig page for the doc originally docketed as the no-bill indictment looks like this (identical to what I just posted). Basically, Lindsey put the sig page from the purported indictment on the no-billed one.
Sometime later that day, someone FIXED that (the no-billed indictment) with a correct last page.
Let me try to explain how John Durham made you MAGAts all look like dumbasses.
By context, this email of 2 Russian spies talking about starting a Deep State conspiracy is July 26.
But this Russian spy report--the one you're all drooling over? Durham has, AFAIK, ALWAYS hidden the date of that. Always. 🤔 @ChuckGrassley is probably colluding with him to do so now.
But BY CONTENT, it can only have been written July 26 or later.
@ChuckGrassley Now, Durham concluded that the Bernardo emails were "compilations," which is a dodge word for "fabrication." But even if you believe the Bernardo emails are REAL, the one via which the Russian spies would have "learned" that Hillary "approved" a smear campaign was date July 27.
In a declaration filed this week, Trump's top DOGE at Treasury cited a GAO report from last year. Lots of people On Here are taking that $2.7T out of context. (And ignoring that poor Tom miscited some quotes in this paragraph, but we expect shoddy work from DOGE.)
But let's look at the GAO Report he relies on, shall we?
FIRST humiliating thing DOGE Tom didn't tell anyone is that MANY of these improper payments--the reason there was a recent spike--pertain to Trump's own COVID programs.