Flynn's sorry-ass refusal to march to the Capitol bc it was too cold on Jan6 is hilarious for a lot of reasons, but it has significant ramifications for both the Oath Keepers and Brandon Straka.
But a lot of this also falls out from the VIP fight (the Report is a bit thin on that too, not even mentioning Flynn): Had Flynn and Stone gotten their speaking role, they likely would have marched.
The effect was likely the same (except for Straka and the Oath Keepers).
The Report relies on claims Alex Jones made on his own show for details about his movement, which makes it about as reliable as the claim that Sandy Hook victims were just crisis actors.
I can't tell you how many times TV lawyers told me Alex Jones was not a key link between the White House and the Proud Boys giving shape to the attack.
Some of those same TV lawyers discovered, for the first time, that Proud Boys marched to the Capitol before Trump spoke.
The Report chooses not to rely on Tim Kelly's ruling debunking this claim, nor does it point out that Jones went nowhere near the stage the permit of which he invoked, nor does it focus on Ali Alexander, who arranged the permits and was right there in the video.
The Report generally does well at incorporating materials from court documents into the larger whole. But it's curious that J6C chose NOT to include the part of Matthew Greene's statement of offense where he described the POINT of crowding the Capitol was to pressure Pence.
Congratulations to failed GOP Gov candidate Ryan Kelley, who delayed pleading long enough for DOJ to add this false claim to his charges, if they decide to add a felony to your charges. (He continued his case in early December to February.)
This is one of many reasons why J6C's referral of incitement of insurrection referral will go nowhere.
How did Trump incite the Proud Boys if they didn't attend his speech?
You gotta prove that OTHERS committed insurrection, and for the most part, the evidence is thinner.
This passage on Ron Loehrke relies entirely on his arrest affidavit, not video, which is unfortunate bc the #SeditionHunters did a superb video showing him directing traffic on the W side.
Also I wish J6C would ID military experience--he's a Marine.
One moment I wish they had included a picture, bc Johnny Gordon and his tats is one of my favorite rioters.
I've said a couple of times that not discussing the veterans who played key roles in the attack was a missed opportunity. Here's a report from April 2021 on about that.
Lots of commentary described that Leo Wise said they overwhelmed jury w/evidence bc they had to. He was saying something more subtle: bc Hunter hadn't stipulated to being an addict, they had to.
Still doesn't explain the need to provide mostly comms entirely unrelated to period.
Here's Leo Wise arguing that if someone hasn't been to rehab then they may not know they're an addict so they could argue they weren't knowingly an addict when they possessed which is fucked on a number of levels, and ALSO doesn't deal with the AA issue.
Wise doth protest too much, methinks.
If they don't get a guilty verdict on possession, which I think they likely will get, it will because they decided to bazooka a bunch of shit from 4 years of addiction rather than the period actually at issue. If I were a juror I'd be pissed.
Here's an example of one of the puzzles abt the messages from the laptop. It's an August 8, 2018 SMS text saved as a message on the laptop.
The laptop did not register to Hunter Biden's iCloud account until October 21, 2018, months later. documentcloud.org/documents/2473…
Here's a table showing where the comms prosecutors planned, pretrial, to include on summary came from. Pink was validated by Hallie Biden. Blue is stuff Hunter tried unsuccessfully to exclude on other grounds.
As you can see, those two 8/8 SMS texts are entirely isolated. The only other message that predates the actual laptop is this 10/8/18 iMessage account to someone who had accounts with Hunter. The Apple email in question was used more for business.
This, from Ankush Khardori, is one of the better reports on what led to the Hunter Biden prosecution. For example, it correctly describes that Judge Noreika killed the plea deal.
First, it is uncontested that Weiss' office told Hunter's lawyer in June 2023 there WAS no pending investigation against him (eg, FARA). When Leo Wise said there was, it reneged on the plea as agreed.
Also, Noreika killed two things:
1) the plea deal 2) the diversion
It's not clear what legal authority she had to kill the diversion, a contract between DOJ and Hunter. THAT's what would have immunized him from this case.