Flynn's sorry-ass refusal to march to the Capitol bc it was too cold on Jan6 is hilarious for a lot of reasons, but it has significant ramifications for both the Oath Keepers and Brandon Straka.
But a lot of this also falls out from the VIP fight (the Report is a bit thin on that too, not even mentioning Flynn): Had Flynn and Stone gotten their speaking role, they likely would have marched.
The effect was likely the same (except for Straka and the Oath Keepers).
The Report relies on claims Alex Jones made on his own show for details about his movement, which makes it about as reliable as the claim that Sandy Hook victims were just crisis actors.
I can't tell you how many times TV lawyers told me Alex Jones was not a key link between the White House and the Proud Boys giving shape to the attack.
Some of those same TV lawyers discovered, for the first time, that Proud Boys marched to the Capitol before Trump spoke.
The Report chooses not to rely on Tim Kelly's ruling debunking this claim, nor does it point out that Jones went nowhere near the stage the permit of which he invoked, nor does it focus on Ali Alexander, who arranged the permits and was right there in the video.
The Report generally does well at incorporating materials from court documents into the larger whole. But it's curious that J6C chose NOT to include the part of Matthew Greene's statement of offense where he described the POINT of crowding the Capitol was to pressure Pence.
Congratulations to failed GOP Gov candidate Ryan Kelley, who delayed pleading long enough for DOJ to add this false claim to his charges, if they decide to add a felony to your charges. (He continued his case in early December to February.)
This is one of many reasons why J6C's referral of incitement of insurrection referral will go nowhere.
How did Trump incite the Proud Boys if they didn't attend his speech?
You gotta prove that OTHERS committed insurrection, and for the most part, the evidence is thinner.
This passage on Ron Loehrke relies entirely on his arrest affidavit, not video, which is unfortunate bc the #SeditionHunters did a superb video showing him directing traffic on the W side.
Also I wish J6C would ID military experience--he's a Marine.
One moment I wish they had included a picture, bc Johnny Gordon and his tats is one of my favorite rioters.
I've said a couple of times that not discussing the veterans who played key roles in the attack was a missed opportunity. Here's a report from April 2021 on about that.
Barry Loudermilk, page 18: Liz Cheney had too much authority.
@RepLoudermilk, page 12: @Liz_Cheney didn't have enough authority.
Loudermilk relied on Trump's Truth Social posts, rather than sworn testimony. I guess @RepLoudermilk is so stupid he believes everything Trump says on Truth Social?
A big part of @RepLoudermilk's attack on Cheney amounts to insinuation that @realJodyHunt acted unethically, which seems like something he might want to avoid.
Note that, contrary to common myths about the investigation into Trump, this subpoena PRECEDED Cassidy Hutchison's public testimony (and even Greg Jacob's, by a day).
The precedents were all set before Jack Smith was appointed.
Here's an interesting, almost entirely argument that bears on the immunity case. Trump was invoking Executive Privilege but (as Howell laid out) he was having such convos w/people outside of Exec, like Rudy.
Howell ordered second batch of witnesses to testify on November 19. Trump asked for a stay on December 7. In the interim, witnesses testified. That almost certainly means they are 2 Pats & likely Eric Herschmann (which is consistent w/public timeline).
Liz Cheney, Maria Shriver, and Kamala Harris sitting on a stage talking about bipartisanship.
One dynamic of this I've been tracking is this: Harris SHOULD NOT be talking nitty gritty abt Jan6 bc of the prosecution. Well, Cheney is the expert. And she speaks it well.
As she did, guy in back was nodding over and over.
Cheney: In this election, we need to elect the responsible adult.
We learned last week (from the NYT, among others!) that Trump is bypassing transition laws, meaning he--and his sons, the Saudi business partners and transition team members--could just get payments from the Saudis all the way until inauguration.
This is a legit question. First, gap arises from delays that were inevitable w/president and first attempt to prosecute one. That took 21 months at least.
Also, it's POSSIBLE Smith is avoiding indicting anyone else until he's sure Trump can't pardon them.
There are VERY subtle suggestions in the immunity filing that several people started cooperating after being exposed in state cases. But Mueller investigation is testament to why you can't cooperate your way up to Trump.
Or let me sum up delay better: 1) Trump conspired through lawyers. Each lawyer's phone/email took 9 months of privilege review. 2) Trump hid behind exec privilege: That took 10 months. 3) Immunity Q had to be decided. That has taken a year, so far.