A few thoughts on this video about high J IQ by @UBERSOY1 Now I agree with the main thesis that J IQ is around 110, but I would say that the main disagreement between me and the authors is I view nepotism as more important for J success than they do.
Looking at the Nobel prize, we see that Jews became more overrepresented after ww2, and this was mostly due to shared prizes with gentiles. nanopdf.com/download/the-j…
It is possible this could be due to a decrease in anti-semitism, but we know that Jews are more likely to cite Jewish academics, this could be due to bias from J or G but given relative rates of ethnocentrism in the 1990s it more likely due J in group bias faculty.washington.edu/agg/pdf/Gwald&…
Another line of evidence used to discount nepotism is the success of of Jews in mental games like chess or bridge etc. First of all nepotism could play a role in these areas if group members work to promote the sport among the in-group and provide training to the in-group.
South Asians made up 21 of the 23 past spelling bee champions, does that mean that as long as Indians are less than 91% of an institution we are to assume that nepotism played no role in their success? theconversation.com/how-indian-ame…
We also see Nigerians being successful in Scrabble even though they have a low average IQ, now the govt pays the players so this is a sort of nepotism that helps Nigerians in Scrabble. qz.com/africa/1744913…
Concentration in cities is an important contributor to Jewish success. This paper makes an important contribution to this issue by comparing J to college educated G living in cities. Jews are more likely to have individual and family incomes over 110k bjpa.org/content/upload…
This old Ideas and Data article seems to disagree on the claims about Jews and personality, and personality and sucess IDK if Sean still stands by this analysis, or which analysis is painting a more complete picture. web.archive.org/web/2019060117…
But I would dispute the claim that Jews are particularly altruistic. This analysis from the inductivist found the only statistically significant differences in altruism favored gentiles. inductivist.blogspot.com/2009/12/jews-a…
This analysis shows that Jews do give more money to charity, but given income differences it is questionable if they gave more as a percentage of their income: theconversation.com/american-jews-…
It was difficult to find average income by religion if we assume that unspecified protestant to be representative of protestants as whole (which honestly no clue) than Jews are slightly less altruistic than P but more than C. (Though my analysis has a lot of assumptions)
This analysis says they are 1.7% of total prisoners, so seemingly not far off there either: alephne.org/templates/sect…
The authors do touch on nepotism, I think Sean gives a more thorough take on this and the possible role it might play in J success here: Another thing about the intermarriage point is that you marry out and still be fiercely ethnocentric look at Ye. ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020/05/17/jew…
Another interesting paper: most immigrant groups made less the more foreign their names were but Russians (mostly Jewish) made more, the less assimilated they were. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
The paper states: "The literature on the
Eastern European Jewish immigrant experience attributes advantages to displaying a
strong ethnic identity. Scholars have described
the important role of ethnic aid societies in
Jews’ economic success"
In general it is not unusual to see extreme overrepresentation in certain industries due to ethnic networking like Indians and motels, Vietnamese and nails Cambodians and donuts. Given that J are smarter than average could they replicate this mainstream media and academia?
Open to criticism on any of these points. This was just a cursory look at some of this data so I may have interpreted it wrong. Please be respectful if you engage with the authors in the comments, "Ur a Jew" is not an argument.
People who may be interested @AmericanKrogan @BronskiJoseph
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Short thread on race and Greek life. This legal scholar recently filed some FOIA requests for public universities to get some data on mainstream frats and sororities (IFC/Panhellenic) and this is what the data looks like overall:
2/ The IFC fraternities they looked at were slightly less white at around 72%. Everywhere greeks life was at least 15% whiter than the university population as a whole.
3/ Comparison between % of undergrads who are black vs panhellenic sororities. At the schools that turned over chapter level data almost half of chapters had no black members.
1/ Short thread. The WSJ asked business historians to rank the greatest entrepreneurs and business leaders in American history. Here are the racial demographics:
1/ Short thread. Meadow Pollack was an 18 year old student at Parkland High School with dreams of becoming an attorney. She was fatally shot as she draped her body over a younger student attempting to protect her.
2/ In the aftermath of the shooting, her father tried to figure out what policies lead to her death and teamed up with a researcher to write this book. amazon.com/Why-Meadow-Die…
3/ Here are some excerpts from this book. The book goes through all of the ways in which in which the shooting could have been prevented. If the shooter had a criminal record of one of the serious crimes that he committed he would not have been able to legally purchase a firearm.
1/ Short thread. What was the "best" year if you were to judge it solely by paying to attention to the news and not Pinkeresque metrics like child mortality in Lesotho?
2/ For the purpose of this thread we will look at years 1992 and onwards since this is when the cold war was over. We can immediately exclude years like 1994, 2001, 2004, and 2020 due to major world events.
3/ Next lets exclude every year with more than 100,000 combat deaths. That gets rid of 1999, 2013-2017 and 2021 onwards.