3/ I've performed multiple analysis analysis and breakdown of the contracts, at first concentrating on the Brazilian contract, because it was (and still is) the ONLY contract which can be admissible evidence
in a court of law.
4/ The other reason I concentrated on the Brazilian agreement was the geopolitical environment in Brazil.
The Brazilian senate, run by the president's opposition, had created a special committee to investigate the government, and they had a VERY special witness.
1) Pfizer started their worldwide negotiation in May 2020. 2) Pfizer did not prioritized any country. 3) Pfizer had negotiated and signed contracts WITH THE SAME CONDITIONS with more than 110 countries around the world.
4) The contract model was the same used in all countries. Obviously, each country required adjustments due to local regulations and conditions. 5) Pfizer followed the same negotiation plan with all the countries around the world.
6) Pfizer instructed their subsidiaries to start negotiation in June 2020. 7) Hogan Lovells (@HoganLovells) is the law firm that was/is advising Pfizer on a global level. 8) The negotiation with the countries was done by Pfizer, not Hogan Lovells.
9) THE CONDITIONS OF EXEMPTION FROM LIABILITY ARE THE SAME IN ALL CONTRACTS. 10) Pfizer contacted all governments at the same time and progressed in parallel. Pfizer DID NOT had different tiers for different countries when it came to their negotiation.
11) Pfizer demanded the same conditions from all the countries. 12) Pfizer only moved to sign the contract with Brazil AFTER Brazil passed legislation 14.133/2021 on March 10, 2021. It was a new Public Procurement Law, that enabled the removal of liability. #PfizerLeak
11/
13) Brazil called some of the clauses leonine clauses, meaning unilaterally prejudices the right of Brazil:
a) Pfizer demanded payment to an account abroad.
b) Contractual disagreements will be ruled in NYC.
c) Brazil will be responsible for all side effects.
14) during negotiations Pfizer needed the conditions set in legislation 14.133/2021. This is why the federal senate and the Brazilian congress had to approve the new law. Only then Pfizer deemed the legal conditions in Brazil to be adequate for signature.
15) The Brazilian medical regulator (Anvisa) started the approval process on the 25/11/20, formal registration was on 5/2/21, and it was approval on 23/2/21. 16) The approval in other countries:
UK: 2/12/20.
US: 11/12/20.
17) On 7/8/20 Pfizer presented information to the Brazilian government on their development progress, and about global negotiation. They did not go into details because Brazil did not sign yet the confidentiality agreement (NDA = Non Disclosure Agreement).
18) THE NEGOTIATION WITH PFIZER WAS DONE BY PFIZER WITH THE SUPPORT OF AN EXTERNAL LAWYER, BOTH ON A LOCAL LAW FIRM (Pinheiro Neto) and international (Hogan Lovells).
19) In December 2020, Brazil offered a provisional measure to address some of Pfizer concerns.
20) In Jan 21, the president excluded the text mentioned in #19. 21) In Feb (or March) 21, senators has introduced a the bill that guaranteed Pfizer the legal security they demanded. 22) Pfizer defined New-York as the place to settle all legal disputes.
23) Pfizer demanded full indemnity. 24) Pfizer demanded the enactment of provisional measure were Brazil guaranteed against potential financial damage, via a deposit. 25) articles 22,23, and 24 were the condition Pfizer had to all countries.
25) When it came to cost, there were 3 tiers of countries - low income, middle income, and high income. Brazil was middle income. 26) PFIZER CONDUCTED 3 CLINICAL TRIALS IN BRAZIL. IT IMPACTED THE PRICING.
27) "THE STANDARIZATION OF (contractual) CONDITIONS HAS ALLOWED US TO ADVANCE AT THE PACE THAT WE HAVE ADVANCED" (Carlos Murillo)
20/
28) Dispute settlement, competent jurisdiction, applicable law, language & confidentiality, and indemnity clauses, were defined unilaterally by Pfizer, and were consistent across all contracts Pfizer has signed.
29) Countries signed the advance purchase order, which was conditioned to medical regulator approval. When it was issued (and when the other conditions as mentioned above materialized), Pfizer was able to deliver their product.
If you want to see the original Brazilian document that covers Carlos Murillo testimony, as well as a translation to English of the testimony (in four parts, with highlights), please go to the following link:
Yesterday @YaffaRaz published an article about the contracts Israel signed with Pfizer, after consulting with @GalG____, an Israeli Lawyer. When I commented on the article, Gal blocked me, and then Yaffa.
24/ Gal has been claiming since Jul 21 that the contract Israel signed with Pfizer was unique, that no other country had such contract, and that any claims anyone (me) makes otherwise is false and misleading.
She has never provided evidence to support her claims.
25/ The above testimony, under oath, of the most senior Pfizer manager in Latin America, allows us to look in parallel to Israeli's contractual milestones and dates, and understand them.
26/ First, let's look at "real world epidemiological evidence collaboration agreement", which was 1st released (heavily redacted) on the 26th of January 2021, and released again (slightly less redacted) after a court has ordered @IsraelMOH to provide a signed copy.
28/ Article 10 of the reply by @IsraelMOH that was submitted to the court on the 26th of October 2022, has stated the agreements signed between the Ministry of Health and Pfizer. (see original + translation to English).
29/ The same article also had two more dates mentioned:
* The CDA (probably a typo, meaning NDA, Non Disclosure Agreement) confidentiality agreement was signed on July 12, 2020;
* A statement of principles was signed on 13.11.2020.
1) NDA - according to Carlos Murillo, Pfizer instructed their subsidiaries to start negotiation in June 2020. In order for the negotiation to start, Pfizer wanted NDA, and it seems Israel signed it on the 12th of July 2020.
2) Side letter: As Yaffa rightfully stated, we now know that the "side letter" was executed by the parties on the 13th of November 2020.
We have no evidence that "letter of principles" is the side letter, as each mentioned separately. Let's assume it is one. #PfizerLeak
32/ This seems more like the provisional measures that Brazil had given to Pfizer to address some of their concerns, which, like in Israel, was request by Pfizer as a guarantee prior to the signature on the manufacturing and supply. #PfizerLeak
33/ From timeline perspectives, it make sense that the side letter was focusing on paying to a foreign account which is what Pfizer has demanded. After signing on 13/11/20, Israel performed a prepayment to Pfizer, for 8 million dosages of the "vaccine" on 21/11/20. #PfizerLeak
30/ Sadly, @GalG____ made a mistake in understanding the response. The 1st clause DOES NOT state that the "real world epidemiological evidence collaboration agreement" was signed on the 1st of Dec 2020. There are clues in the contract itself.
31/ If the contracts were signed together, there would have been a direct reference to the "real world epidemiological evidence collaboration agreement". The fact it is not mentioned shows it arrived later.
32/ If both documents were signed at the same day (as @GalG____ claims and @YaffaRaz wrote), why would they need to reference different dates in the contract? It shows total lack of understanding to the nature of the manufacturing and supply agreement and its clauses. #PfizerLeak
33/ So the right timeline is:
* NDA: 2020-07-12.
* Side Letter / "Letter of Principles" : 2020-11-13.
* Manufacturing and Supply Agreement: 2020-12-01.
* Real World Epidemiological Evidence Collaboration Agreement: 2021-01-06.
34/ Final thoughts:
Last year, when I exposed the Pfizer contracts (#PfizerLeak), Gal has done everything she can to discredit my work. Because she is a lawyer, and because I don't live in Israel and had no ability to have a real debate with her, people believed her.
35/ I believe I provided enough evidence to support my claims for the events that took place with regards to the contractual agreements with Pfizer.
If @GalG____ has any proof to show I am wrong, she is welcome to present it.
36/ It is sad that @YaffaRaz followed @GalG____ actions. Blocking someone because the evidence they present contradicts your unsubstantiated statements and beliefs only shows how weak your argument is.
37/ Finally, here's #Pfizer's statement about the date of the research agreement:
"In January (2021), Pfizer and the Israel MoH entered into a collaboration agreement to monitor the real-world impact of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine."
Pediatric Moratorium! Adult Use Restrictions! Veterinary Prohibition!
"Codon Optimization in mRNA Vaccines and Gene Therapies: An Assessment of Protein Misfolding Risks and Regulatory Oversight" submitted to the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee!
Here's the Executive Summary
Objective: This white paper evaluates the scientific evidence and regulatory oversight related to codon optimization in messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and gene therapies for both human and animal applications. Its primary goal is to assess whether the potential risks—specifically protein misfolding, aggregation, and associated diseases like amyloidogenesis and prionogenesis—justify a moratorium on this technology’s use. The analysis aims to inform policy by balancing innovation with safety.
Scope: The assessment covers the principles of codon optimization, the mechanisms of protein folding and misfolding during translation, and the risks of amyloid formation and prion-like propagation. It reviews regulatory frameworks, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) requirements. The scope includes a detailed examination of scientific literature—both foundational and recent—such as studies on tissue-specific codon usage, codon context effects, and structural risks in mRNA vaccines. It also analyzes preclinical and clinical safety data, pharmacovigilance reports, and a case study on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Additionally, the paper explores implications for veterinary vaccines and food chain safety, concluding with an updated risk management and policy evaluation.
Key Findings: Codon optimization enhances protein production in mRNA-based vaccines and therapies but introduces risks that challenge its presumed safety. New research shows that changing codons—previously thought to be neutral—affects translation speed and accuracy, potentially leading to protein misfolding and aggregation. For example, the cardiomyocyte PAO model reveals that misfolded proteins can cause delayed, severe damage, such as heart failure, broadening concerns beyond brain-related diseases. Data from TissueCoCoPUTs indicate that generic codon optimization often mismatches the translation needs of specific tissues, increasing misfolding risks. In COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, structural issues like excessive G-quadruplex formation may heighten these dangers.
Regulatory oversight, however, falls short. There are no standard tests to evaluate how codon changes affect protein shape or clumping, and long-term monitoring is insufficient to detect slow-developing issues like neurodegeneration or prion-like diseases. The rapid rollout of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines lacked thorough evaluation of these folding risks. In veterinary applications, the use of codon-optimized therapies in livestock raises unresolved concerns about misfolded proteins entering the food chain and environment, potentially affecting human health.
Conclusion on Moratorium
Given the mounting evidence of risk and gaps in oversight, a tiered moratorium is recommended as the most cautious and effective approach:
· Pediatric Moratorium: Codon-optimized mRNA vaccines and gene therapies should not be used in children under 18 until safer practices are developed. This includes using tissue-specific codon designs, conducting 24-month safety studies in primates, and setting limits on G-quadruplex formation. Children’s developing tissues are especially vulnerable, and long-term data are lacking.
· Adult Use Restrictions: New clinical trials for risky mRNA designs—those with heavy optimization, high clumping potential, or rich GC content—should pause. This halt would last until advanced tests, such as Kinetic Folding Assurance (KFA), hidden gene screening, and cross-seeding checks, are required.
· Veterinary Prohibition: Codon-optimized gene therapies in animals entering the food supply should be banned. Evidence from the PAO model and prion diseases suggests a risk of transmissible misfolded proteins, posing a threat to food safety.
This moratorium should persist until:
· Reliable tests for protein folding and clumping are part of regulatory standards.
· Codon optimization accounts for tissue-specific needs and translation timing.
· Independent research verifies the safety of high-risk designs and pediatric use.
· Better monitoring systems track long-term health effects.
This approach marks a shift in how codon optimization is viewed: it’s not just a tool for efficiency but a process that demands careful study of its effects on protein structure and safety over time. By adopting these measures, we can protect public health while still advancing mRNA and gene therapy innovations.
The whitepaper has just been published in my Sub/I\Stack (Link in my pro/I\file)!
I published my first article on codon optimization risks and the COVID-19 vaccine in August 2021 (#COptiGate) and wrote extensively on the topic. This white paper, submitted to the @US_FDA, is my final attempt to highlight our regulators' complete failure.
🚨Microwave Ovens Might Be Risking Your Health! 🚨
Did you know that eating microwaved food could cause blood changes linked to cancer? Russians knew it. Swiss scientist Dr. Hans-Urich Hertel discovered this over 30 years ago, but the microwave industry tried to silence him.
🧵
Dr. Hans-Urich Hertel was a Swiss food scientist who challenged microwave safety. In 1989, he teamed up with Professor Bernard Blanc to study how microwaved food affects us. Their findings? Alarming enough to spark a decade-long battle! #ScienceHeroes #MicrowaveResearch
Hertel and Blanc recruited eight volunteers from a macrobiotic institute in Switzerland. For eight weeks, they ate raw, conventionally cooked, or microwaved foods—like milk and veggies—under strict conditions (no smoking, alcohol, or sex!). Blood tests followed every meal. #MicrowaveStudy #HealthResearch
THE GLOBAL IT OUTAGE YOU WITNESSED WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT!
IMPORTANT! The purpose of this thread is to explain non-IT and to non information/cyber security professionals why I believe the outage you are seeing around the world due to the update from #Crowdstrike is not an accident.
Before we begin - introduction.
Hi everyone. My name is Ehden Biber. I'm known as the person behind #PfizerLeak, and most of my writing here on X/Twitter has been on ph@rma related topics. HOWEVER, my professional work has been information security and cybersecurity.
My credentials include:
· Head of information security in Metro Bank (UK).
· Merck/MSD Information security office for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA).
· Consultant to insurance and financial institutes.
The opinion you are about to read is based on YEARS of experience.
"MEDICAL GENETICS…WILL BE THE SOUL OF PERCISION MEDICINE IN EVERY FIELD"
It is time to expose another member of the W.H.O. science council and her views on genomics and gene therapy (mRNA). Introducing Dr Mary-Claire King.
[Thread]
[1/7]:
[2/7]
Doctor Mary-Claire King is a very known geneticist who has discovered in 1990 BRCA1,which was the first gene for a hereditary form of breast cancer. She is a professor of genome sciences in the university of Washington, Seattle, USA. medgen.uw.edu/people/mary-cl…
[3/7]
Her later work was focused on the genetics of schizophrenia, she is recognized as a pioneer in the development of DNA sequencing for human rights investigations, and she is also a Senior Associate Core Member of the New York Genome Center.
THE COUNCIL: INTRODUCING THE W.H.O. SCIENCE COUNCIL THAT IS ABOUT TO CONTROL YOUR LIFE.
As we approach the final stages of the #WHO coup d'état attempt, it is time to expose the group of unelected people who will control your future and their alarming agenda!
#TheCouncil
[Thread]
2/ In December 2023 the WHO produced a report that sets the stage to radical changes that soon will be enforced all the citizens of the world: make gene therapy (mRNA) key technology in the fight against infectious diseases, cancer, and combat any resistance to such technologies.
3/ It called to develop new gene therapy treatments against pathogens, promote investment in "equitable" development of the technology, use it as THE medical countermeasure mechanism to tackle pandemic threats, and to combat any resistance to the technology ("misinformation").
@robinmonotti 1) He uses the exaggerated Hamas dataset. 2) He uses a definition of children for anyone under 18 years old. 3) He say Palestinians were expelled in 1948, but don't mention many left because Arab nations told them to so they can butcher Jews in the war they started.
More below.
@robinmonotti 4) He compare the number of children who died to the sum total of children died 3 years before. He does not compare it to the number of children who died in other conflicts IN THE REGION, such as in Syria. That like comparing apples and pears.
More below.
@robinmonotti 5) The definition of who is a Palestinian by the UN is ANYONE WHO LIVED IN THE MANDATED PALESTINE FOR TWO YEARS prior to June 1848! No ancestors required!
This also made Egyptians who escaped Egypt not to become work slave in the creation of the Suez canal into Palestinians.