This will be an analytical thread🧵on the recapitalizing the PSU (Ukrainian Air Force) S-300 surface to air missile (SAM) force, AKA The Great HAWK Round Up.
Western efforts to date have been inadequate, even with the NASAM & the latest Patriot delivery started by the Biden
1/
...Administration.
To fully recapitalise this PSU SAM force of initially 30 batteries of S-300PT/PS in 2014 (those in Crimea were captured by Russia) will require a further 20+ batteries of NASAMS and Iris T with some Patriot back stop for the ATBM role.
2/
The issue is the Western Allies do not have that many SAM batteries available in their current inventories, nor the ability to produce more quickly.
To date, Poland has provided one or more batteries of S-125/SA-3 Goa, the Spanish have provided ~2 batteries of Aspid,
3/
...Germany has provided an IRIS-T battery, the US & Norway have put together a NASAM battery, France is providing a SAMP/T battery and there are rumors of one or two MIM-23 I-Hawk batteries from Nordic countries, plus the announced US Patriot battery.**
4/
** It is unclear to me exactly how many Patriot launchers & radar systems are being sent. Less than a full battalion is a certainty.
Italy is thinking about providing Ukraine with a SAM battery but has actually just sold one to Pakistan.
...other civil infrastructure from further cruise missile strikes by Russia.
While NASAM is the "perfect answer" because of the launcher's ability to draw on 20 years worth of AIM-120 AMRAAM and AIM-9 Sidewinder air-to-air missile production sitting in NATO air force stocks.
7/
Ukraine needs "Good Enough Right Now," not "Perfect (NASAM) Next Year."
This is where the humble 1990s MIM-23 I-Hawk may have to be used as a stop-gap capability for defeating low flying cruise missiles and older Russian tactical jets w/o jammer pods. 8/
The Cold War era MIM-23 I-Hawk was the closest thing to a NATO standard SAM as could be found. Batteries were established behind the inter-German border ~50 km apart for a "SAM Belt" denying low level to stratospheric air space to Warsaw Pact jets.
It costs a lot of money elected legislators don't want to spend to decommission a HAWK missile.
So hundreds, if not thousands should still be in containers European NATO nations and US non-NATO allies & client states for transfer to Ukraine.
10/
Low flying cruise missiles don't have human pilots capable of reacting to threats, or electronic warfare systems that can jam radars or drop flares & Chaff.
They are target drones for most missiles whose threat comes from either
...saturation or evasive routing versus know radar locations.
Even an Igla shoulder fired SAM can take one out of properly alerted by Ukrainian Uber-like software on computer tablets connected to cell phone networks.
The problem is Ukraine is huge - the size of Texas in terms of square hectares.
Ukraine needs those 20 HAWK batteries to draw enough of those 50 km diameter circles to cover it's power grid & other civil infrastructure from Russian cruise missile strikes.
14/
Gathering enough HAWK batteries from around the world - regardless of their configuration - is something only a team of the Biden Administration's Defense & State Departments can do.
It can be done in weeks, if the Biden Administration has the wit and will to do so.
15/15 End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a result of Ukraine's "Uber like" air defense network software that passes cruise missile tracks to shoulder fired missile teams so they can set up and be ready when a Russian cruise missile comes into range.
That is, think taxi calling app smartphone software telling you about the flight path of cruise missiles.
It is this sort of IT which is the real counter to lots of small prop/quadcopter loitering munitions, paired with guns firing proximity fused shells.
Sure lasers &
2/
...microwave weapons are coming -- Follow @MIL_STD for those details -- but only heavy machine guns and autocannons are cheap enough to be proliferated across a ground force.
There are unconfirmed reports that Russian air defense has managed a repeat of its 2018 Syria friendly fire misadventure with a VKS Il-20M COOT ELINT aircraft in downing a VKS Su-27 at high altitude over Engels air base.
For those who don't get the 2018 reference, this is the infographic Russia put out at the time claiming Israel did it and a profile of the plane that got killed then.
2/6
The war has gone long enough - plus Ukraine has captured enough VKS & Russian Army plane wreckage & air defense gear - that I am beginning to wonder whether Ukraine has compromised Russian identification friend or foe systems. 3/6
“The F-35 Joint Program Office has issued a Time Compliance Technical Directive (TCTD) to restrict some aircraft, 1/ defensenews.com/air/2022/12/27…
...which have been evaluated to be of higher risk, from flight operations while the investigation into the mishap on December 15 continues and until procedures can be developed for their return to flight,” the JPO said. “The affected aircraft have been identified, and the...
2/
...JPO will work with the [U.S. military] services and [international] partners to ensure compliance with the TCTD.”
A slow low flyer with digital maps made from from satellite images with satellite radio navigation updates can easily fly between terrain and known military radars.
@Tendar I did a long thread in 2020 about Azeri drones and modern mission planning software showing how anyone with drones can maneuver at low levels through an integrated air defenses.
This is going to be an analytical thread on Ukraine's Engle's Air Base drone attacks, the Tu-141, radar interference tracking, an explanation of the role of battle damage assessment in airpower to try & inform/explain the reasons How & Why Ukraine has been successful.
1/
First, let's start with a definitional understanding of what Ukraine's Engle's Air Base drone attacks are.
PSU, Ukraine's Air Force, is using drones to execute the "Offensive Counter Air" (OCA) mission to break up massed VKS cruise missile attacks. 2/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offensive…
The consensus is a Ukraine converted the Tu-141 drone into a cruise missile and has been striking Engle's Air Base.
I disagree with this consensus.
It doesn't fit long standing Ukrainian Tu-141 operational patterns that have to do with PSU...
@kamilkazani has a real point in this thread that not all Russians are crooks or thieves through the simple test of large scale working military weapons & infrastructure.
There has to be some level of organizational reward for 'doing the right thing' simply to
This gets into the nature of large political and criminal machines.
For such machines to work over time, you need an "honest broker" trusted and respected by all for things to be done & services provided, despite the graft, fraud waste & abuse.
2/
The Pendergast political machine in early 20th Century Kansas city is a classic example with Harry Truman playing the role of "honest broker" between the Goat & Rabbit factions.