1/ New research shows that the type of antibody radically shifts upon the 3rd dose of mRNA. Potential implication is losing the ability to launch a viable immune response against future infections.
2/There are four subtypes of IgG antibodies, labeled IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. By far, IgG1 is the predominant subclass of antibody which is present after an infection. IgG1 antibodies can neutralize an infection, and also help clear an infection.
3/In this paper, they show the normal IgG1 response after the first 2 doses, but after the third dose an unusual and sharp increase in IgG4 is observed in almost all vaccinees. An IgG4 response is not normally seen with other vaccines or repeated infections.
4/IgG4 is a non-inflammatory antibody, with the ability to bind and neutralize soluble or membrane bound spike protein. However, unlike IgG1 antibodies, IgG4 are terrible at launching effector functions that mobilize cellular clearance of the virus.
5/More specifically, IgG4 exhibits decreased Fc-mediated antibody effector functions including decreased antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement deposition (ADCD). These are required to help with viral clearance.
6/“In our study, antibody-mediated phagocytic activity and complement deposition were reduced in sera after the third immunization, in parallel to higher proportions of anti-spike IgG4 antibodies.”
7/“Since Fc-mediated effector function could be critical for viral clearance, an increase in IgG4 subclasses might result in longer viral persistence in case of infection.”
8/“However, it is also conceivable that non-inflammatory Fc-mediated effector functions reduce immunopathology while virus is still being neutralized via high-avidity antibody variable regions.”
9/“In a cohort of vaccinees with breakthrough infections, we did not obtain any evidence for an alteration of disease severity, which was mild in almost all of our cases. Larger cohorts with differential disease severities will be needed to address this aspect in the future.”
10/“Nevertheless, a Brazilian study during the early phase of the pandemic correlated an early onset and high levels of anti-spike IgG4 antibodies with a more severe COVID-19 progression after SARS-CoV-2 infection, which might indicate a less effective antibody response.”
11/“Additionally, Della-Torre et al. reported on a significant association of high IgG4/IgG1 ratios with poor disease outcome.”
12/If repeated booster doses further skew the antibody pool towards IgG4, this could translate into an impaired ability to clear future infections.
1/ Could it be that “someone” engineered a highly toxic Spike protein sequence, with the following properties:
1. Furin Cleavage Site 2. Nuclear Localization Signal 3. High Affinity for ACE2 and Neuropilin 4. Superantigenic regions (SEB, etc) 5. Molecular Mimicry Regions
2/And this same “someone” knew that this same exact amino acid sequence would then be sold as a “vaccine” which is packaged into an mRNA delivery system to convert our cells into toxic Spike protein synthesis machines?
3/This “someone” would know that the virus would quickly attenuate these engineered pathogenic signals via mutation and selection, and thus the virus would trend towards being innocuous; however,
1/This is a secondary reevaluation of the safety data from the clinical trials. They find a serious adverse event ratio of ~13 per 10,000 doses. This extrapolates to 341,000 Serious Adverse Events in the U.S. They also find potential net harm —-> thread
2/ “In both Pfizer and Moderna trials, the largest excess risk occurred amongst the Brighton category of coagulation disorders.”
3/In the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) was higher than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants).
Since Spike is toxic, you would think that there would be ample amounts of pharmacokinetic data to answer this question, but the answer is they did virtually nothing in humans.
I link my previous threads on what is known —>
2/ Thread 1 on Duration of Spike Expression In Human Body. Click to see entire thread—>
In simple terms, ADE is when an antibody causes a subsequent infection to be worse than if the antibody weren’t present.
Usually, antibodies reduce the severity of an infection, but sometimes they can make the infection worse.
2/There are 2 major mechanisms that cause ADE. Both occur via the antibody binding to the FcyR receptor. The first (on the left) is when the antibody binds to the virus and then enables the virus to infect and replicate in an immune cell (rather than neutralizing the virus).
2/The 2nd mechanism (on the right) is when the antibody binds the virus and creates a larger immune complex that stimulates the complement cascade. This causes excessive inflammation and destroys respiratory tissue.
- Should impart immunity with a memory component that lasts for a reasonable period of time.
- Should prevent infection.
- Should contribute to herd immunity.
- Should not impair your overall immunity.
- Should not cause more harm than good.
—> thread
2/ Immune Memory: The fact that people are on their 5th injection in less than 2 years demonstrates that the mRNA jab is not producing sufficient immune memory. This is unprecedented and a major red flag that something is majorly wrong, This is not how our immune system works.
3/ Preventing Infection: Multiple studies now show that not only are people who are up to date on their injection schedules becoming infected, the risk of becoming infected actually increases with the number of injections. Again, something is majorly wrong.
1/New study from Cleveland Clinic demonstrates that the risk of a COVID infection goes up with number of doses of the jab. See graph below. They admit that this is unexpected and they call into question the effectiveness of mRNA. What follows are direct quotes from their paper>
2/ “The association of increased risk of COVID-19 with higher numbers of prior vaccine doses in our study, was unexpected. A simplistic explanation might be that those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk of COVID-19.”
3/“A small proportion of individuals may have fit this description. However, the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals and all were eligible to have received at least 3 doses of vacc. by the study start date,…”