1. Conspiracy theorist Dave Oneegs, a founder of “Aussie Helping Hands” is in court next month facing charges of alleged unlawful fundraising. So is Hayley Birtles-Eades, another person assoc w/ AHH. I’ve been looking into Hayley & uncovered some interesting information
2. According to a Whois search from March, website Aussie Helping Hands dot com dot au was originally registered to Hayley’s business “Beinc”. The Whois search says Beinc is a company. However the ABN listed is not for Beinc, it’s for a discretionary trading trust
3. A Whois search for the Beinc website lists a company called Love Jewellery Pty as the owner. However, that company was deregistered by ASIC in Feb 2020.
4. Beinc is actively trading according to their Facebook page & website
5. Hayley has a second business called “Love Lockets (actually she has MANY businesses but that’s a story for another day!). A Whois search says for the Love Lockets website lists a company called Born Brands Pty Ltd as the owner
6. Born Brands Pty Ltd was deregistered by ASIC in May 2016! The Love Lockets business still appears to be trading too.
7. There’s no business name registration for BEINC. There is one for BEINCS (with an “s”), but that has been cancelled and appears to have no association w/ Hayley. And Hayley’s own ABN was cancelled in November
8. When Aussie Helping Hands was first set up in early March, the website listed Dave Oneegs & Beinc/Hayley as co-founders.
9. The website was suddenly updated on 25 March to remove all references to Dave Oneegs, Beinc and Hayley!
10. That same day Dave suddenly started referring to himself as a “volunteer”. On March 27, Dave randomly made a post emphasising he was not a founder. “It’s not my account”.
11. Obviously something happened on March 25. It wasn’t until April 10 that Dave announced his own bank account had been frozen. He said Fair Trading froze it on 8 April. What happened on 25 March?
12. Dotty, the purported founder of AHH, also had her bank account frozen. She was raided by FT on suspected misappropriation of funds. Dotty says FT couldn’t find any evidence of funds misappropriation. However she was fined for not having a licence to fundraise
13. Dave’s first court appearance is on 20 Jan. Hayley also has two court appearances coming up in Jan (she’s had two already back in Sept & Nov). It’s not clear whether these are related to the Fair Trading investigation
14. Interesting- Hayley is looking to sell Love Lockets. With the website domain in the name of a deregistered company, she’s going to find it v difficult to transfer the domain name to a new owner!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️

Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExposingNV

Sep 7, 2025
🧵

1. Bike Boy’s private criminal prosecution of Daniel Andrews will go nowhere

Allow me to explain… Image
2. For your continued education, the Victorian legislation that delegates the plenary power of the Crown (the Victorian Governer General to be exact) to the Victorian Director of Public prosecutions is the Public Prosecutions Act 1994 (Vic)
3. Section 22(1) (a) of the Act gives the DPP, and ONLY the DPP, the absolute authority to institute (initially charge), prepare and conduct indictable offences Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 15, 2025
🧵

1. Bec Freedom, who’s one of the organisers behind the 31 August “anti immigration” rally claims she’s not a racist & that any recordings of her making statements to the contrary have been taken out of context

Let’s see if Bec’s claims stack up!
2. Here’s Bec sharing the tweet of a neo-Nazi, promoting her rally on 31 August Image
Image
3. I asked Bec why she was re-tweeting the post of a neo Nazi and she replied with this: Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 1, 2025
1. A Pauline Hanson fan’s hope for a High Court showdown has ended before it even began!

The self represented litigant tried (& failed) to get the High Court to declare 18C invalid & overturn Pauline Hanson’s Federal Court loss

🧵
2. Heidi Ward filed a writ naming the Cth, Federal Court & Senator Mehreen Faruqi as defendants. She wanted to overturn decision in Faruqi v Hanson, declare s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act invalid & have Faruqi ruled ineligible to sit in Parliament Image
3. Because her proposed writ was so obviously lacking in legal basis, she needed the High Court’s permission just to file it!

(This only happens when an application on its face is lacking in merit!) Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 20, 2024
🧵1. Earlier this year, conservative US commentator Candace Owens was denied a visa to Australia on grounds she has “capacity to incite discord”

She’s now challenging that decision in the High Court of Australia!

In this thread I explain what her case is all about! Image
2. This case is very different to Djokovic’s legal challenge over the Minister for Home Affairs’ decision to deny him a visa. In that case, Djokovic essentially challenged the WAY the Minister made his decision to deny him a visa
3. HERE, Candace is challenging the LEGISLATION that gives the Minister the power to deny her a visa!
Read 16 tweets
Dec 13, 2024
🧵
1. The no longer suspended doctor Bay vs AHPRA & the Medical Board.

In this thread, I summarise the court’s decision: why Bai is no longer suspended, why his Constitutional argument failed, and what the possible future brings for Dr Bay Image
2. This case was an application for “judicial review” by Dr Bay. He applied to the QLD Supreme Court for a review of the following 2 decisions of the Medical Board: the decision to suspend him & the decision to investigate his conduct
3. What is judicial review? It’s the power of a Court to review decisions of government agencies or public bodies. The role of the Court is to determine if the decision was properly made – the focus is on the law & how the decision was made, not the MERITS of the decision
Read 29 tweets
Dec 11, 2024
🧵
1. What happens when lawyers behind a failed lawsuit against Pfizer & Moderna accuse the presiding judge of bias because the judge happened to have a science degree & a cousin who once supported medical research?

A judicial smackdown of course! Image
2. Background to this drama:

Controversial doctor Julian Fidge decided to sue Pfizer & Moderna, claiming their COVID vaccines were genetically modified organisms & illegally unlicensed under the Gene Technology Act
3. Justice Rofe of the Federal Court dismissed the case summarily, on the basis that Fidge lacked “standing” to bring the proceedings. Fidge used the same lawyers who’d once represented the Australian Vaccination-risks Network (cont)
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(