Notice 2023-11: Temp relief provided to banks under Model 1 #FATCA IGAs who can't provide SSN numbers of #Americansabroad ("preexisting accounts only") if the gov joins banks in taking specific steps to educate individuals about FATCA + @citizenshiptax. home.kpmg/us/en/home/ins…
Purpose of Notice 2023-11 is to ensure that banks in a Model 1 #FATCA jurisdiction won't be deemed to be "non-compliant" with the IGA if they can't provide a US SSN for "pre-existing accounts". The notice can be accessed and read in its entirety here ... irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n…
Step 1: The relief is available to the banks in a Model 1 #FATCA IGA jurisdiction and ONLY if the government of the jurisdiction commits to engaging with (1) individual US citizens (2) the banks and (3) US Treasury to facilitate compliance.
Step 2: Assuming Step 1 (above) has been met, the individual banks must comply with the procedures outlined in .03 (annual requests along with DOB) and .04 (meets specific guidelines for the annual requests). .03 describes what the FFI is required to do ....
Step 2 contd: .04 prescribes that the guidelines for the annual requests for US SSNs must include specific information that educates US citizens about #FATCA and/or educates them about how to renounce US citizenship using the 2019 "Relief Procedures For Former Citizens".
US Treasury makes clear that renunciation (in conjunction with 2019 relief procedures) is an option 4 #Americansabroad who don't want to comply with #FATCA. But, "Relief Procedures" available only to those who have never filed a 1040 + net worth < 2 mill. citizenshipsolutions.ca/tag/relief-pro…
The exclusions from the 2019 Relief Procedures For Former Citizens are described in 2023-11 as follows ...
In addition, it is VERY important to understand that the "relief" provided in 2023-11 applies ONLY to "preexisting accounts" (accounts in existence when the #FATCA IGA was signed). This does narrow the application of the relief ...
Conc: #FATCA Notice 2023-11 = a message that US intends to enforce @citizenshiptax on #Americansabroad with @taxresidency in other countries. Only when US severs citizenship from @taxresidency will the problems of ALL #Americansabroad be solved, all the time in ALL circumstances.
Notice 2023-11 is intended to provide "temporary" relief for the FFIs (banks). It is NOT intended to provide any relief for individual US citizens who continue to be nothing but trouble for the banks. If you were a bank would you want to be dependent on the "relief" from the US?
#FATCA Notice 2023-11 provides comfort that US will NOT notify France of "Significant Non-Compliance" under IGA Article 5 if bank can't provide SSNs for "pre-existing" accounts. This means only that the bank won't be sanctioned bc of those specific US citizens who don't have SSN
#FATCA 2023-11 provides NO relief for individual US citizens. At best, .05 requires the Model 1 IGA jurisdiction to "(3) Encourage FFIs ... to not discriminate against U.S. citizens that do not provide a U.S. TIN". Perhaps banks are required under local law to provide accounts?
While providing relief to banks and no relief to US citizens, Notice 2023-11 directs significant escalation on #FATCA enforcement against individuals by engaging the Model 1 IGA jurisdiction directly. Will the French gov start FATCA awareness campaigns?
A suggested ad per #FATCA Notice 2023-11, from all the Model 1 IGA jurisdictions directly to their residents ...
Digging deeper... Under #FATCA IGAs a FFI that fails to receive SSN can be deemed to be in "Significant Non-Compliance" under Article 5, resulting in a requirement that the FFI be REQUIRED to close account. Notice 2023-11 means that FFI would not be REQUIRED to close the account.
To put it another way: The effect of #FATCA Notice 2023-11 is that the FFI's are not (temporarily) REQUIRED to close the account of a US citizen without an SSN. But (subject to local law) they are permitted to close the account under the rules. How will the banks/gov respond?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Richardson - Counsellor for US persons abroad

John Richardson - Counsellor for US persons abroad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExpatriationLaw

Sep 6
If you who wonder whether @DemsAbroad has any interest in issues facing #Americansabroad, here's the answer. @TheDemocrats do NOT care about @citizenshiptax and #FATCA AND "They don't care that they don't care." It's ONLY about your vote!! via @YouTubeyoutube.com/live/9cgIbShsW…
@DemsAbroad @TheDemocrats @CitizenshipTax @YouTube The "Americans Abroad for Harris-Walz-Live" delivered the following message to #Americansabroad:
I felt sorry for @DemsAbroadTax head @AbroadRebecca who was an "Island Of Relevance For #Americansabroad" in an ocean of contempt and ridicule. Rebecca was marginalized by appearing in the last few minutes (too late) and in a group of abt six others (watering down the issue).
Read 10 tweets
Sep 3
UNITED STATES v. SCHWARZBAUM (2024) - Aug. 30, 2024: 11th Circuit (citing Gorsuch dissent in Toth Supreme Court cert petition) disagrees with 1st Circuit ruling in Toth and rules 8th Amendment excessive fines clause applies to aspects of #FBAR penalties. caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-11th-…
The Schwarzbaum #FBAR case is a very interesting decision with fascinating decision of English law. Key excerpts (no substitute for reading full decision) caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-11th-…

Image
Image
An interesting aspect of both Toth and Schwarzbaum is that the funds in their respective foreign accounts were inherited or gifted from a parent. Two things come to mind: 1. This was clearly NOT money that while being accumulated was "US taxable" 2. Issue of foreign gifts?
Read 4 tweets
May 8
Biden 2025 Green Book contains proposals exacerbating impact of US @citizenshiptax on #Americansabroad by creating @doubletaxation. Do NOT be fooled by references to "High Income" and "Wealthy". Reform of "taxation of capital income" = trouble for all! home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
Image
The 2025 Green Book repeats proposals in 2024, 2023 and 2022. For "some" of the impacts on #Americansabroad see this 2022 post from @VLJeker us-tax.org/2022/04/21/par…

Image
Image
Notice also the extension of and raising the NIIT #Americanabroad with small businesses (including local businsess of #expats. Clear @doubletaxation bc the NIIT (generally) cannot be used as a credit against US taxes. home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 29
This will be interesting. The larger issue is how the meaning of the treaty is to be determined and whether the US Treasury is the one to determine that meaning. But, it’s clear that USA has declared war on French residents afflicted/disabled by U.S. citizenship.
USA is arguing that US/France tax treaty should be interpreted to REQUIRE @doubletaxation if France dares to tax investment income sourced in France and received by US citizens (property) resident in France. Treaty #savingclause used to create #doubletax and not avoid it.
The US gov’s brief is mind blowing claiming (inter Alia) that to allow an FTC on French source income would (because of the FEIE which doesn’t apply to invest income) give #expats a double benefit. taxnotes.com/research/feder…
Read 7 tweets
Apr 19
Congratulations to @MonteSilver1 and @GOPIsrael - the #GILTI lawsuit remains alive!! news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-repo…
The oral argument in Monte Silver v. IRS (definitely worth listening to) is here ... courtlistener.com/audio/89880/mo…
In the April 19/24 decision in @MonteSilver1 v The IRS the USCA remanded the case to the District Court to reconsider the applicability of the South Carolina v Regen case. Full decision is here ... taxnotes.com/research/feder…
Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9
Interesting analysis from @DanNeidle. Example of the use of procedural rules to avoid analyzing what the #FATCA IGAs are really about (especially in application to UK residents). Should the UK really allow the US, to claim UK residents as US taxpayers? taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/03/08/sec…
@DanNeidle Par 5 of ruling Judge makes factual mistakes: 1. #FATCA IGAs are NOT US "treaties". 2. US tax authorities do NOT transfer information on "US citizens resident in the UK". Transfer is on individuals RESIDENT in UK (not citizens) who hold accounts in US!. assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2024/5…
Image
Par. 4 includes acknowledgement that #FATCA IGAs apply to accounts held by UK RESIDENTS who are US citizens. IGAs do NOT apply to US residents who are UK citizens. Hence, US receives UK account info about people who live in UK and do NOT live in the US! assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/kb/2024/5…
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(