Notice 2023-11: Temp relief provided to banks under Model 1 #FATCA IGAs who can't provide SSN numbers of #Americansabroad ("preexisting accounts only") if the gov joins banks in taking specific steps to educate individuals about FATCA + @citizenshiptax. home.kpmg/us/en/home/ins…
Purpose of Notice 2023-11 is to ensure that banks in a Model 1 #FATCA jurisdiction won't be deemed to be "non-compliant" with the IGA if they can't provide a US SSN for "pre-existing accounts". The notice can be accessed and read in its entirety here ... irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n…
Step 1: The relief is available to the banks in a Model 1 #FATCA IGA jurisdiction and ONLY if the government of the jurisdiction commits to engaging with (1) individual US citizens (2) the banks and (3) US Treasury to facilitate compliance.
Step 2: Assuming Step 1 (above) has been met, the individual banks must comply with the procedures outlined in .03 (annual requests along with DOB) and .04 (meets specific guidelines for the annual requests). .03 describes what the FFI is required to do ....
Step 2 contd: .04 prescribes that the guidelines for the annual requests for US SSNs must include specific information that educates US citizens about #FATCA and/or educates them about how to renounce US citizenship using the 2019 "Relief Procedures For Former Citizens".
US Treasury makes clear that renunciation (in conjunction with 2019 relief procedures) is an option 4 #Americansabroad who don't want to comply with #FATCA. But, "Relief Procedures" available only to those who have never filed a 1040 + net worth < 2 mill. citizenshipsolutions.ca/tag/relief-pro…
The exclusions from the 2019 Relief Procedures For Former Citizens are described in 2023-11 as follows ...
In addition, it is VERY important to understand that the "relief" provided in 2023-11 applies ONLY to "preexisting accounts" (accounts in existence when the #FATCA IGA was signed). This does narrow the application of the relief ...
Notice 2023-11 is intended to provide "temporary" relief for the FFIs (banks). It is NOT intended to provide any relief for individual US citizens who continue to be nothing but trouble for the banks. If you were a bank would you want to be dependent on the "relief" from the US?
#FATCA Notice 2023-11 provides comfort that US will NOT notify France of "Significant Non-Compliance" under IGA Article 5 if bank can't provide SSNs for "pre-existing" accounts. This means only that the bank won't be sanctioned bc of those specific US citizens who don't have SSN
#FATCA 2023-11 provides NO relief for individual US citizens. At best, .05 requires the Model 1 IGA jurisdiction to "(3) Encourage FFIs ... to not discriminate against U.S. citizens that do not provide a U.S. TIN". Perhaps banks are required under local law to provide accounts?
While providing relief to banks and no relief to US citizens, Notice 2023-11 directs significant escalation on #FATCA enforcement against individuals by engaging the Model 1 IGA jurisdiction directly. Will the French gov start FATCA awareness campaigns?
A suggested ad per #FATCA Notice 2023-11, from all the Model 1 IGA jurisdictions directly to their residents ...
Digging deeper... Under #FATCA IGAs a FFI that fails to receive SSN can be deemed to be in "Significant Non-Compliance" under Article 5, resulting in a requirement that the FFI be REQUIRED to close account. Notice 2023-11 means that FFI would not be REQUIRED to close the account.
To put it another way: The effect of #FATCA Notice 2023-11 is that the FFI's are not (temporarily) REQUIRED to close the account of a US citizen without an SSN. But (subject to local law) they are permitted to close the account under the rules. How will the banks/gov respond?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting and motivating ... Frequent references to the fact that the fight to repeal WEP and GPO has been going in since 1983 (40 years). Adovacy is difficult!
Principle 7 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
It's critical to understand how US @citizenshiptax makes it harder and more expensive for U.S. companies to hire U.S. citizen employee/managers/executives. Nobody understands this better than Jim Gosart - @jgoshksk ...
Principle 6 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
The biggest obstacle to change to the US @citizenshiptax extra-territorial tax regime is NOT Congress or Treasury
The biggest obstacle to change is (amazingly) #Americansabroad as a group.
Because, @citizenshiptax affects different people very differently, it is hard to (1) define the problem (people understand it in how it affects them) and (2) willingness to actively campaign for change.
All #Americansabroad must come together to demand the severance of citizenship from @taxresidency.
Let's consider different groups and imagine how
@citizenshiptax affects members of those groups. Those with their financial center of gravity in the US might object to the compliance/filing requirements. But are not likely to experience the destructive affects of having a financial center of gravity outside the USA.
Least impacted: 1. Those who retired in the USA and moved abroad 2. Wealthy Americans who move abroad 3. Employed expats who are temporarily abroad.
Most impacted: 4. Emigrants living permanently abroad 5. Accidental Americans who file U.S. taxes
Could go either way: 6. Digital nomads (often use FEIE to avoid paying tax anywhere).
The key point is that because @citizenshiptax impacts people in different ways it is hard to get universal support for severing citizenship from @taxresidency.
Most people want their specific problem solved but are NOT supporters of completely ending the extra-territorial tax regime.
Principle 5 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
Starting in "Principle 1" I explained that the problem of the #doubletaxation of #Americansabroad exists in relation to non-US income sources received by individuals who do NOT live in the USA (AKA #Americansabroad.
Key point: If @USCitizenAbroad does NOT have non-US income sources and assets, the US @citizenshiptax will be experienced mostly as filing a US tax return while living outside the USA. From that perspective it's easy to see why non-resident US citizens with US income sources and assets are not hugely impacted by US #citizenshiptaxation.
Let's be a bit more precise. Imagine you have a @USCitizenAbroad with an investment portfolio of US stocks, US Social Security or a US pension. Even if taxed by the non-US country, the US generally has first right of taxation (it's US source income). US will NOT impose punitive taxation bc it's US source income. (The other country will generally provde a credit for US tax paid.
Now let's consider a @USCitizenAbroad with a non-US investment portfolio (possibly including non-US mutual funds), non-US pension, small business corp located outside the USA the situation is the opposite of having all US based assets. The non-US country has first right of taxation. The US will then impose very punitive taxation, reporting and penalties because it is "foreign income and assets". #PFIC, #GILTI, #Form5471, #Form8938, #Form8621, etc. - denial of foreign tax credits ...
Clearly US @citizenshiptax allows those WITH US asset
Second, the lost opportunity of not being able to participate in retirement and financial planning programs created by their country of actual residence:
Third, the horrible fees to tax preparers to prepare (often incorrectly) US tax returns. It is obvious that compliance costs should be considered a separate tax on UScitizenship.
Fourth, the inability to have access to normal banking, brokerage and investment accounts. US Treasury denies this is happening. But, I have people all over the world #renounceuscitizenship in order to free them from this US @citizenshiptax imposed disability.
Fifth, who in their right mind would engage in business opportunities with a U.S. citizen partner. Would you want to have your banking info reported to the IRS
Principle 3 - understanding what the #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad means:
Because @doubletaxation of #Americansabroad is caused by US @citizenshiptax it is clear that ending the #doubletaxation of @USCitizenAbroad can be ended by ending #CBT - AKA separation citizenship from @taxresidency. This is the ONLY solution that solves the problems of all people, all the time and under all circumstances.
That said, other solutions have also been proposed.
These other solutions which RETAIN US #citizenshiptaxation and solve the problems of some but all include ...
-
Proposals that RETAIN US @citizenshiptax but provide relieving provisions for some of the effects of #CBT for some people but not for others. Examples include:
- the 2018 Holding Bill and the later Beyer bills which mostly exclude most non-US source income from US taxation but are aimed at limited forms of income and leave ALL reporting requirements in place (Form 5471, Form 8938, Form 3520, Form 3520A, Form 8621, FinCEN 114, etc.)
Note that although these might enddouble taxaion they are limitedin scope.
It's important to note that #endingdoubletaxation of #Americansabroad ...
- by severing US citizenship from @taxresidency ends all the compliance costs of being a @USCitizenAbroad
- by RETAINING US @citizenshiptax, but creating a "carve out" for foreign income means that the compliance cost, reporting obligations and opportunity cost (restrictions on investing/financial planning) likely continue.