Notice 2023-11: Temp relief provided to banks under Model 1 #FATCA IGAs who can't provide SSN numbers of #Americansabroad ("preexisting accounts only") if the gov joins banks in taking specific steps to educate individuals about FATCA + @citizenshiptax. home.kpmg/us/en/home/ins…
Purpose of Notice 2023-11 is to ensure that banks in a Model 1 #FATCA jurisdiction won't be deemed to be "non-compliant" with the IGA if they can't provide a US SSN for "pre-existing accounts". The notice can be accessed and read in its entirety here ... irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n…
Step 1: The relief is available to the banks in a Model 1 #FATCA IGA jurisdiction and ONLY if the government of the jurisdiction commits to engaging with (1) individual US citizens (2) the banks and (3) US Treasury to facilitate compliance.
Step 2: Assuming Step 1 (above) has been met, the individual banks must comply with the procedures outlined in .03 (annual requests along with DOB) and .04 (meets specific guidelines for the annual requests). .03 describes what the FFI is required to do ....
Step 2 contd: .04 prescribes that the guidelines for the annual requests for US SSNs must include specific information that educates US citizens about #FATCA and/or educates them about how to renounce US citizenship using the 2019 "Relief Procedures For Former Citizens".
US Treasury makes clear that renunciation (in conjunction with 2019 relief procedures) is an option 4 #Americansabroad who don't want to comply with #FATCA. But, "Relief Procedures" available only to those who have never filed a 1040 + net worth < 2 mill. citizenshipsolutions.ca/tag/relief-pro…
The exclusions from the 2019 Relief Procedures For Former Citizens are described in 2023-11 as follows ...
In addition, it is VERY important to understand that the "relief" provided in 2023-11 applies ONLY to "preexisting accounts" (accounts in existence when the #FATCA IGA was signed). This does narrow the application of the relief ...
Conc: #FATCA Notice 2023-11 = a message that US intends to enforce @citizenshiptax on #Americansabroad with @taxresidency in other countries. Only when US severs citizenship from @taxresidency will the problems of ALL #Americansabroad be solved, all the time in ALL circumstances.
Notice 2023-11 is intended to provide "temporary" relief for the FFIs (banks). It is NOT intended to provide any relief for individual US citizens who continue to be nothing but trouble for the banks. If you were a bank would you want to be dependent on the "relief" from the US?
#FATCA Notice 2023-11 provides comfort that US will NOT notify France of "Significant Non-Compliance" under IGA Article 5 if bank can't provide SSNs for "pre-existing" accounts. This means only that the bank won't be sanctioned bc of those specific US citizens who don't have SSN
#FATCA 2023-11 provides NO relief for individual US citizens. At best, .05 requires the Model 1 IGA jurisdiction to "(3) Encourage FFIs ... to not discriminate against U.S. citizens that do not provide a U.S. TIN". Perhaps banks are required under local law to provide accounts?
While providing relief to banks and no relief to US citizens, Notice 2023-11 directs significant escalation on #FATCA enforcement against individuals by engaging the Model 1 IGA jurisdiction directly. Will the French gov start FATCA awareness campaigns?
A suggested ad per #FATCA Notice 2023-11, from all the Model 1 IGA jurisdictions directly to their residents ...
Digging deeper... Under #FATCA IGAs a FFI that fails to receive SSN can be deemed to be in "Significant Non-Compliance" under Article 5, resulting in a requirement that the FFI be REQUIRED to close account. Notice 2023-11 means that FFI would not be REQUIRED to close the account.
To put it another way: The effect of #FATCA Notice 2023-11 is that the FFI's are not (temporarily) REQUIRED to close the account of a US citizen without an SSN. But (subject to local law) they are permitted to close the account under the rules. How will the banks/gov respond?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Richardson - lawyer for "U.S. persons" abroad

John Richardson - lawyer for

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExpatriationLaw

Dec 30, 2022
Lots of discussion on "reciprocity" question. What does "reciprocity" mean? Q. Is it possible for there to be "reciprocity" when "obligations" are in the form of an agreement (possible contract) or where the contract is the result of duress? Consider the following examples ...
What if Mr. A makes Mr. B "an offer he can't refuse"? Mr. B agrees to the obligation. Is this "reciprocal" or is this an agreement under duress? Can one really say this "classic" staple of American culture - is an example "reciprocity? Is it thuggery?
A second example ... neither Roxie nor Mamma Morton is behaving in a spirit of kindness/generosity. What is called "reciprocity" is about avoiding sanction (which is why all governments entered into #FATCA IGAs).
IRC 1471 imposes sanctions. Reciprocity?
Read 10 tweets
Dec 29, 2022
Excellent article by @HelenBurggraf explaining that the new Argentina IGA (like previous #FATCA IGAs) is NOT reciprocal. An earlier and lengthy expose explaining in detail why #FATCA IGAs are NOT and likely will never be reciprocal agreements is here ... citizenshipsolutions.ca/2022/07/24/the…
The remarks from Ambassador Stanley are clearly designed to suggest the US Argentina #FATCA IGA is "reciprocal". Whether by accident or design this statement is not accurate.
It is useful to examine the exact text of the US Argentina #FATCA IGA to determine what Argentina is required to do and what the US is required to do and decide whether the agreement is reciprocal. home.treasury.gov/system/files/1…
Read 10 tweets
Dec 20, 2022
#RBT countries understand "saving clause" to protect the internal tax base. Bc of @citizenshiptax + #FATCA US uses "saving clause" to BOTH PROTECT internal tax base + EXPAND tax base by claiming people with @taxresidency in other countries as US taxpayers. taxconnections.com/taxblog/croati…
Both OECD + UN Treaties include a "saving clause" which "saves" right of a country to tax its "residents". All countries (including the US) make "residency" a sufficient condition for @taxresidency. Only the US has @citizenshiptax. Hence, "saving clause" speaks only of residents.
The evolution of the "saving clause" found in US Tax Treaties is VERY (really) interesting. Watch how they become tighter over time. Here is paragraph 3 of Article 4 of the 1973 US Romania Tax Treaty. It applies to (1) "residents" (as defined by treaty) and (2) "citizens".
Read 12 tweets
Dec 16, 2022
Appears a delay in processing US tax forms is making it difficult for Canadian residents to comply with their Canadian tax obligations. Nobody told them about the perils of the cross border tax world when one lives in Canada and is paid for working in US. cbc.ca/news/canada/wi…
The relevant treaty provision ... canada.ca/en/department-…
Article XV says that the salary earned by the Canadian resident nurses who work in the USA "may" be taxed by the USA. Article XXIV par 3 says that the income is "sourced" to the USA which gives the USA the first right of taxation ... canada.ca/en/department-…
Read 6 tweets
Dec 10, 2022
When flying over international waters or on a cruise ship in international waters, US citizens are indeed subject to double taxation bc and only bc of US citizenship. Explained by @1040Abroad and @Expatriationlaw here … citizenshipsolutions.ca/2022/01/20/air…
To clarify it is US citizens with @taxresidency in another country that are subject to #doubletaxation. Think pilots, cruise ship employees and #Americansabroad who work on the plane. See this podcast with Jim Gosart of @RepOverseas where we discuss.
The #doubletaxation of income earned in intl waters is one more consequence of @citizenshiptax and another example of how #Americansabroad are taxed more punitively than US residents. Here is a series of podcasts with @RepOverseas explaining the problems citizenshipsolutions.ca/2021/11/30/rep…
Read 5 tweets
Dec 9, 2022
.@NYTimes author @AmandaTaub discusses Brittney Griner trade for Victor Bout. The following excerpt suggests Russia may not see the trade as "an arms dealer for a minor drug offender". Russia may see the trade as securing the return of a person victimized by unfair US process.
@nytimes @amandataub The recent @AmandaTaub article referenced in above tweet is here ... …saging-custom-newsletters.nytimes.com/template/oakv2…
Interesting discussion of the Victor Bout charge and trial here ... latimes.com/world/la-xpm-2…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(