I only want to say this about the #Santos saga. I know everyone’s saying the money is the issue - and finding out the source of his sudden wealth is important. But even w/o disqualifying facts of financial corruption, his particular, serial, immoral lying is itself disqualifying.
There are a few matters of deception that bespeak deep moral rot & manifest unfitness for public svc. Lying abt the death of your mother, abt losing family in the WTC on 9/11, abt family members perishing in or fleeing from the Holocaust strike me as falling into that category.
We have witnessed & experienced the danger of having mendacious, out-of-control,morally compromised officials in public life over the past few years. At some point it becomes a threat to the integrity of democracy. By hanging it all on the money, we allow the Reps to do the same.
It will take considerable time to fully investigate the improprieties that likely led to his spontaneous financial enrichment. In the meantime, there are his sick, serial and macabre lies. They matter. They are disqualifying. And drawing that line is important. Especially now.
Just because the Republicans may lack the integrity to negotiate his resignation, or to censure and sideline him immediately once sworn in, doesn’t mean we must all relinquish our moral compass. His constituents in particular should demand more.
So he should spurned by other politicians, esp. House Members and New York politicos. “His” constituents should recognize that they are victims of a fraud and treat him as someone who purloined their vote by fraud, and disrespected them as citizens.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There shld never be threats against judges. But Judge Salas’ son was murdered at her home in 2020. Abortion providers faced increased assaults through 2020 and 2021. Election workers faced violent threats in 2020. Librarians are facing death threats.
Speaker Pelosi’s husband was nearly killed this year. Members of Congress, even the VP ran for their lives on Jan 6th. Judges have not been singularly targeted in this violent moment. And the response to protect the justices was swift & bipartisan.
While I always appreciate a remembrance of the circumstances surrounding the violence that marked the desegregation of Central HS in Little Rock, and the courageous judges who issued important decisions in civil rights cases despite threats of violence from white supremacists.
The #GeorgeSantos phenomenon is impt b/c it represents a part of Trumpism that still must be tackled: shamelessness. Trump’s invitation to shamelessness has been received by elected officials,parents who scream at kids who wear masks, or who threaten librarians,lawyers & judges.
Attys have made claims they knew were w/o merit, or coaxed witnesses to lie, or that judges have made rulings clearly contrary to law or demonstrably at odds w/the facts,or candidates claim to have won elections they lost and they have done so shamelessly w/o fear of consequence.
The only way to tackle this is to ensure that there are consequences for this conduct - not putting dishonest cops on a “do not call” list, but prosecuting them or removing them frm ofc. Not saying “let the voters decide,” but sanctioning,refusing to seat or censuring electeds.
So we've had a good laugh abt the fmr President's build-up to his trading cards reveal. It's embarrassing & pathetic. But beyond the laughs let's get serious about what this means. This is the man that enough Americans (yes,not the majority) elected to lead this country.
It's important that we sit w/the colossal reckless, irresponsibility that allowed tens of millions of Americans to elect this morally bankrupt, unserious, cruel, dishonest person as President, & then again after learning that he was even more unfit than originally thought.
This represents a monumental failure of American citizenship, and unwillingness of far too many Americans - principally white Americans - to exercise restraint, discipline or respect for govt. or American leadership. And that means that our democratic decline runs deep.
I know it’s pointless, but here are the words of the First Amendment to the Constitution from which we derive our right to “free speech.”
3 questions:
Is Twitter “Congress?
Is Twitter a govt agency or arm?
Was Jack a govt actor?
Is Musk?
To all 3, the answer is no.
Twitter is a private corporation. It is under no legal obligation to platform, hate speech, calls to overthrow our govt, racist speech, anti-semitism, threats or intimidation, election misinformation, or ang other posts that violate Twitter’s own community standards.
And this may hurt: we’re judging you. If you’re a racist, an anti-Semite or wish to end democracy in America, we’re judging you. No, most Americans don’t think your speech is legitimate discourse in the “marketplace of ideas.” We think it’s ugly, intimidating & hostile.
The most dispiriting aspect of the discussion about Trump’s meal w/those two odious ppl is that I thought there was consensus that Trump is a white supremacist. In which case 3 white supremacists had dinner. Why is Trump getting portrayed as an innocent who was snookered?
And there’s also a mystifying amnesia about the evidence supporting Trump’s antisemitism, notwithstanding his support for Israel & his Jewish son-in-law & daughter. A few reminders: vanityfair.com/news/2019/12/d…
We know that domestic violence is often the early warning sign for mass shooters and our laws shld reflect that. So I want to flag this recent outrageous decision from the Western District of TX.
Earlier this month in the Western District of TX,a judge used the “history & tradition” test announced by SCOTUS at the end of last Term in Bruen,to hold that a law that a federal law that makes it a crime to possess a firearm while under a restraining order, is unconstitutional.