Days after we revealed that 50% of the Palestinian deaths in 2022 were claimed by terror groups, the NYT asserts that there is a "rush by armed groups to claim those killed as martyrs," and that most were, in fact, civilians.
There's just one problem with that: it's not true.
Our research team discovered that at least 60% were shot as they attacked civilians or security forces with guns, explosives, Molotov cocktails, knives, rocks, and cars. An additional 29% died during violent riots.
The @nytimes simply omits this fact from its article.
It is also important to note that some two-thirds of all casualties occurred in #Jenin and #Nablus, two militant hotbeds competing for the title of Palestinian "terror capital."
On December 21st, we noted how the 𝘗𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘪𝘢𝘯 assault on Israelis is made out to look like an 𝘐𝘴𝘳𝘢𝘦𝘭𝘪 campaign of aggression.
It seems like The New York Times will continue to spread this libel in 2023.
The Palestinian Authority wants the world to believe it has ended its “Pay-to-Slay” program. But is it actually reform—or just a rebrand? Let’s break it down. 🧵⬇️
The PA has long rewarded terrorists with salaries—giving them or their families a financial incentive to carry out attacks on Israelis. The more deadly the attack, the higher the payout.
Some recent headlines suggested that the PA was scrapping this system altogether. But the truth? These claims were misleading, and the so-called “end” of the program is just smoke and mirrors.
As hostages are released from Gaza, some of the world’s most dangerous terrorists are walking out of prison.
🧵 Let's talk about it 👇
Ahmed Barghouti: Serving 13 life sentences for orchestrating 8 attacks that killed 12 Israelis. Once a head of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and cousin of Marwan Barghouti. His record is chilling.
Khalil Yusef Ali Jabarin: Stabbed Ari Fuld, an American-Israeli, in the neck, killing him in 2018. Sentenced to life in prison, yet received monthly "Pay-for-Slay" stipends from the Palestinian Authority. A murderer incentivized.
Did @BBCNews just give a Hamas-linked "journalist" the stage to justify the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks?
Yes, they did. This appalling excuse for journalism should make the BBC ashamed. 🧵
The BBC portrays Bushra al-Tawil as an innocent “journalist” arrested for merely giving a “talk in a mosque.”
What they omit: Bushra has documented ties to Hamas.
Incredibly, the BBC also allows her to justify the kidnapping of innocent civilians.
To its partial credit, @BBCNews mentions her father, Jamal Al-Tawil, but calls him a “Hamas politician.”
Let’s pause. The UK, where the BBC operates, doesn’t engage in this “political wing” fantasy. Why? Because Hamas is entirely a terrorist group. Period.
Hinkle's posts spread inflammatory misinformation, exploiting the power of outrage for profit.
Remember the precise pager attack that targeted Hezbollah terrorists? Hinkle lied, claiming Israel targeted civilians, even when Hezbollah confirmed the devices were theirs.
Imagine a society where children are told their purpose is not to live, but to die. How do you build a future when your leaders glorify its destruction?
Loving death isn’t bravery—it’s barbarity. While the rest of the world cherishes life, Hamas weaponizes its people’s suffering.