Tracy Beanz Profile picture
Jan 1 4 tweets 2 min read
New: @KariLake has filed a petition to transfer the appeal to the AZ Supreme Court.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tracy Beanz

Tracy Beanz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tracybeanz

Jan 3
We see young people experiencing “sudden cardiac death” at rates never before seen in history - and a young NFL player collapse on the field tonight needing CPR. It is too early to say what caused this horrible incident, so I didn’t. I merely pointed out that IT ISN’T NORMAL.
It isn’t normal - no matter how this happened. This isn’t SUPPOSED to happen, and shouldn’t happen. It’s terrible and tragic and ABNORMAL. Whatever his cause of injury, I can guarantee you we won’t ever get the real story. I’ve seen the cover up wheel spinning already.
It’s not shocking that so many are jumping to the vaccine potentially being a cause. Why? Because so many of us have loved ones who have become sick and suddenly died after receiving the shot. OF COURSE it’s where people go. uncoverdc.com/2023/01/02/ras…
Read 8 tweets
Dec 31, 2022
THREAD: This thread will constitute my analysis of the Special Action in Lake v. Hobbs. Buckle up!
Immediately the Lake team uses the proper interpretation of AZ law; that the results of the election are UNCERTAIN. They will get into how the judge erred in his interpretation very shortly.
They state what was proven at trial; failures on Election Day were deliberate. They state what Maricopa has done; Marginalize the deliberate acts with claims of “hiccups” and diminish their impact. This, even as the closing argument blamed voters (Liddy: “You reap what you sow”)
Read 47 tweets
Dec 30, 2022
Hot take: When big accounts ask you a question in a tweet, it’s a way for them to get engagement. I’d much rather just give you information and you’ll comment if you want — unless I truly am asking a question.
Ex: There is a hotly contested speakers race. Who do you feel should be speaker?
Or: “Retweet if you agree that pineapple doesn’t belong on pizza. Let’s show the world we hate pineapple pizza!!”
Read 5 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
THREAD: I am having a hard time understanding the sudden call to “not politicize” things that have already been politicized or are political in nature. I didn’t want movies or comedy to be politicized. I didn’t want sports to be politicized. I didn’t want MUSIC to be politicized.
Alas, here we are. Almost 2023 and LEGITIMATELY everything is politicized. WE DID NOT DO THIS. Woke mobs did. I was perfectly happy shopping without knowing what ideology the corporation held BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T TELL US. It used to be that you did not WANT to alienate half..
…of your customer base. Now people do it as thought it’s REQUIRED.

War is OVERTLY political. War is bad, yes. BUT it is a political action, taken for political reasons. How the hell are you supposed to NOT politicize war?

COVID is OVERTLY political as well. (Cont)
Read 7 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
THREAD: The defendants in this case (Biden admin and various officials) don’t want video depositions to be public once they are part of the record. The judge already ruled that private info like addresses will be redacted. They filed again asking him to deal them.
The Plaintiffs want to be able to release them in the interest of transparency. The government claims officials are being threatened or could be and so they shouldn’t be public. This time, they included ONE nasty email from someone.
It’s interesting, I get worse emails from the left on the daily, but you don’t see me whining and crying about it. Anyway, this was before the judge AGAIN, and AGAIN he ruled in favor of transparency and the Plaintiffs. This case is amazing.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 27, 2022
THREAD: After reading this judges order in detail, it is a useless exercise to try to counter it with evidence, because he didn’t use any to come to his decision. What an absolute disgrace it truly is. clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/home/showpubli…
So, instead, lets talk about what the order DID NOT address, which is much more indicative of willful ignorance on the part of the judge, who even was stunned at some of what was presented, as evidenced by his reaction in open court. How you leave any of this out is beyond me.
For the purposes of this thread we are going to use the judges interpretation of the law, which as @barnes_law points out, is inherently flawed. I know @KariLake attorneys are working on the appeal now. I am NOT an attorney, but I am going to give it a go.
Read 83 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(