Thread by @thewolfofdefi

1./ The concluding thread about $CHNG, $ROUTE and $RUNE.

Three protocols looking to solve the interoperability problem of blockchain, yet different from each other.
They can perfectly coexist and I’m about to tell you why.

2./ @FinanceChainge is working towards being an all-in-one #DeFi platform. Especially when a new bull run starts and new people will come trying to make some gains they could be the perfect platform.

3./ With their amazing visuals and easy-to-understand videos and articles they really seem to recognize this opportunity. They are the decentralized CEX competitor.

4./ People who are not interested in exploring #DeFi and just want to buy, hold and yield assets won’t ever have to leave @FinanceChainge.

5./ However, if I do want to explore #DeFi I’d need my own wallet like @MetaMask. With such a wallet, I can’t make use of @FinanceChainge. If I do want to move assets cross-chain, I need a protocol like @routerprotocol or @THORChain.

6./ @routerprotocol makes it very easy to send assets between EVM-compatible chains. Connect your @MetaMask, and here you go. The way @routerprotocol increases the scalability of bridging is a very interesting technology.

7./ @THORChain enables native, cross-chain swaps. Native swaps are not the same as regular bridging solutions. Especially for people who value full self-custody, native swaps are more interesting than regular bridges.

8./ Because @THORChain has chains integrated which @routerprotocol hasn’t and otherwise, I think despite which tech you like more there is room for both.

9./ Next to the native swaps, it’s also possible to earn yield on your native assets like $BTC and $ETH on @THORChain. This is something that no other protocol offers.

10./ Comparing the yield earning function of @FinanceChainge and @THORChain, I’d prefer @THORChain. On @FinanceChainge your assets live on the @FUSIONProtocol blockchain so they are not native, which is a risk. On @THORChain there are only native assets.

11./ However, on @THORChain there is no possibility to earn yield on stable coins, this is something @FinanceChainge does offer. Also here, there is a piece of the pie for both.

12./ Looking at the tokens as an investment, it’s hard to say one is better than the other. $ROUTE and $CHNG are small caps so they would need less new money to pump, however, $RUNE has by far the best value capture.

13./ @routerprotocol will come with its own L1. @FinanceChainge is about to launch a desktop app, a new website, and will integrate limit orders. @THORChain is building a complete #DeFi ecosystem, #THORFI. So all of them have interesting events coming up.

14./ @THORChain recently partnered with @TrustWallet and @Ledger confirmed they are working on @THORChain integrations. @routerprotocol announced a partnership with @circle. All big things.

15./ The three of them have APIs and SDKs for others to integrate, so this is in favor of all of them.

16./ So, they all have unique features and there is room enough for all three to be a success. $RUNE has the best value capture without a doubt, but $CHNG and $ROUTE have a smaller market cap.

17./ My advice to you? DYOR. I did some work for you, it’s up to you now.

18./ Thank you all for reading all these threads, I’ll continue to write these on other topics. If you have any requests, let me know.