Several people replied to my tweet about Damar Hamlin's cardiac arrest by claiming this happens all the time and is very normal.
Well, I looked into it, and that is actually not true.
Below I will post what I learned about football injury and heart health.
I don't want to be an anti-science theorist, but I did a Google search on heart attacks during NFL games (limiting the search to before 1/6/22) and there is only recorded instance of this happening (which I will get to later).
The Wikipedia page entitled "Health issues in American football," which is pretty comprehensive, only mentions the word "heart" once and it is in relation to the use of HGH.
The Wiki article also mentioned cardiac contusions and Myocardial contusions, though again, we have no instances of cardiac arrest resulting from injury during an NFL game.
It should be understood that in the ye olden days of American football, the rules were much looser and people took much more serious hits.
In 1978, Jack Tatum's broke Darryl Stingley's spine, causing quadriplegia. No heart failure.
I suspect a lot of the people saying "this is normal and happens all the time" are not football fans.
So it should also be noted that the hit Damar took is not remotely unique.
Here's Reggie Bush getting blown out by Sheldon Brown in 2007.
The one person who did suffer heart failure during a game was also the one person who died during a game: Chuck Hughes in 1971.
It turned out he had undiagnosed and advanced arteriosclerosis - this is very serious heart disease.
Generally, no one with serious heart disease would be able to become such a high level athlete.
However, if someone like Hughes was able to perform at a high level while having a serious heart condition, there is no way he could get into the NFL in the current year.
Medical science has increased significantly since 1971, as has American litigiousness.
The NFL does not want to get sued, and they therefore require players to undergo some of the most extreme medical testing imaginable, most of it focusing on heart health.
The people claiming that "Hamlin must have had some serious heart problem" are basing that on nothing, and it is in fact impossible he would be playing if he did.
I hate to post a medical study, as I don't usually find that doing that is very useful, but for the sake of thoroughness I will note that a 2009 study found that NFL players, even as they retire and age, do not have any increased likelihood of heart problems.
I also found some studies since 2009 which claim that former NFL players do have an increased risk of various heart problems as they age. So there is some debate.
Aside from Hamlin and Hughes, the only other person in all of American football who had a heart attack during a game (that I was able to find) was a 13-year-old high school player who had a heart attack in September of 2022.
That had obviously never happened before.
Hopefully this clears some things up.
I was very shocked to see so many people replying to me and claiming Hamlin's incident was very normal and happens regularly, but I wanted to do some reading before I drew any conclusions.
Some of the people saying this are very adamant.
In conclusion, we don't know what caused Hamlin's cardiac event, but we must definitely conclude that this is very unique
It is absolutely fair to speculate.
Call us conspiracy theorists all you want, but there is a very good chance that climate change was responsible.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was widely informed that in order to look up the history of football injuries, I needed to be a medical doctor.
Mere minutes later, however, all of these people who were insisting on a need for credentials if you want to look up how many times someone had cardiac arrest during an NFL game... transformed into doctors!
It's kinda scary the way people will just repeat these statements verbatim from "the authorities." It's a serious zombie world type situation, and it's clear they will go along with literally anything.
To clarify: women's orientation and understanding of the world is based on sex. This is because of evolutionary biology. In a primitive situation, women needed men to survive, because they could not hunt or protect themselves.
What they had to offer men was sex, and the way that they needed to keep a man was to produce his offspring (sex). Therefore, it is just a simple truth that because women's entire survival in nature was based on sex, their hardwired orientation to reality is sexual.
That is not intended to be nasty. Anyone who studies evolutionary biology is aware that this is simply true. It's not political.
We can also all just see that it's true by looking around.
The @mtracey hill dying reply was better than mine.
This was also about Tate.
There are people all over twitter dot com saying people should support an international political witch hunt by the American DOJ because they find him personally distasteful.
It's sad to see grown men so emotional.
I mean, I was criticizing Tate the day before his arrest. It's not like I'm a fan.
But when you've got the federal government on one side and a guy persecuted for his speech on the other, I don't need a second to think about whose side I'm on.
I had not seen this @EMichaelJones1 quote on sexual sins, but it follows what I was just saying here.
Sexual sins are the most common sins. They are mortal sins, but we are mortals. It doesn't help to develop chronic guilt, which is why I do not want to shame anyone over it.
There is only one form of sexual sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance, and I doubt many of my readers are engaged in it.
Promiscuity and pornography are not a small thing and shouldn't ever be diminished, but you're not going to overcome them by beating yourself up.
Acknowledging sin as sin and repenting will at the very least contain it and prevent it from spreading into other areas, while also allowing you to engage the sense of guilt and shame associated with the sin in a positive way.