1/ "Yes, if you die while working for a company, your death will be counted in JOLTS."
This and a few more gems in our #JOLTS primer thread incoming ⤵
2/ What is JOLTS?
It's a data series about labor movements reported by businesses.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes the data once a month on a lagged month basis (November data is published in January).
3/ Why do markets care about JOLTS? 1. It *can* signal the demand for labor. 2. Chair Jay Powell keeps citing "Job Openings" as part of the Fed's internals on monitoring the economy. 3. Specifically, the "job openings rate" is quoted from this data series.
4/ JOLTS is often digested and discussed at the "Total Nonfarm" level meaning all public and private sector businesses except the agricultural industry.
In total, there are 28 different industry slices you can make in this data set.
5/ JOLTS is an acronym for Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey.
Each monthly report, we catch a glimpse into the following data:
Job Openings
Hires
Quits
Layoffs & Discharges
Other Separations
Let's breakdown each of these with a few pictures for our visual learners.
6/ Hires are counted during an entire calendar month with this definition:
"A hire is any addition to your payroll, and: may be a new hire or a previously separated rehire; may be permanent short-term, or seasonal; may be a recall from layoff."
7/ Layoffs are counted during an entire calendar month with this definition:
"Layoffs; discharges; terminations of permanent, short-term, or seasonal employees."
8/ Quits are counted during the entire calendar month with this definition:
"Quits (except retirements)."
We call this chart internally as the "Take This Job and Shove It" chart because that's what it is.
9/ Other Separations are counted during the entire calendar month with this definition:
"Retirements; transfers from this location; employee disability; deaths." Yes, if you die while working for a company, your death will be counted in JOLTS.
10/ Job Openings are counted as of the LAST business day of the month defined by:
"A job is open if it meets all three conditions: a specific position exists; work could start within 30 days; you are actively seeking workers from outside this location fill the position."
11/ And here is one common controversy about Job Openings lies... What is active recruiting?
The BLS defines it as a business taking steps to fill a position and then lists 10+ activities that could qualify including "posting internet notices."
12/ What's the big deal about posting internet notices? It costs companies little to be "active."
h/t to @profplum99 who wisely points out the cost of active recruiting has likely substantially come down thus rendering job openings as a potentially poor measurement.
13/ Even Fed economists figured out the change in price of ads can influence responses when they analyzed JOLTS vs. the Conference Board's data.
14/ One more controversy to mention as recently highlighted in a Spaces conversation hosted by @profplum99 featuring @JosephPolitano: the response rates for JOLTS have been woefully dropping.
See that pink line at the bottom? Yeah, JOLTS.
15/ Recap ⤵
JOLTS matters because the markets will care.
It measures more than just job openings.
It's not without a little controversy.
1/ Employment is viewed as a lagging economic indicator except for when laid off workers seek financial help; that's when this labor activity becomes a leading indicator.
Its fancy name is Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims and it's a data series about the need for financial help for laid off workers.
The Department of Labor aggregates state-level input and publishes the data every Thursday for the prior week.
3/ Why do markets care about jobless claims? 1. It *can* signal demand for labor. 2. It's a higher frequency data set--weekly. 3. Initial claims warn of shocks; continuing claims, drag. 4. It's a leading economic indicator.
"Will a surprising, rising federal deficit affect consumers' jobs?"
⬆ The first of four questions we've been discussing with leadership teams and boards this year. 🧵/16
Why jobs? Consumer capacity to spend is largely defined by employment.
Why federal deficit? ⤵
2/ The federal deficit, though down from last year because of pandemic program comparisons, is rising quickly. Consider this snapshot taken right before the end of the federal fiscal year: the deficit went from just under $1T to the final reading of $1.4T in one month.
3/ Offsetting our federal deficit is a big increase in tax receipts. Said differently, our federal deficit would be higher still if, say, we had to return those tax receipts in the form of tax refunds. We believe this is plausible.
“I don’t understand why we even need to be profitable.” —unnamed tech co employee
I’ve heard a few disturbing quotes over the years while in the field but this one is the one I recall to mind most often.
2/ When I see the layoffs announced and the pending ones around the corner, the very people who don’t understand a need for profitability are the ones likely to be laid off.
I fear there’s a whole generation of tech who don’t understand the role of profits as a good goal.
3/ “They’ll be fine; they’ll bounce back.” —conventional wisdom
Will they? What kind of unresolved baggage will they carry with them into their new roles? Will they find it difficult to trust their new employer, their future co-workers, their upcoming performance reviews?
Few will leave Twitter. It’s too costly to egos to leave.
Which means the advertisers will return. It’s too costly to ignore an installed base of daily (hourly) users.
Sunday morning musings and a story incoming ⤵️
Back during what appeared to be the peak usage of Clubhouse, blue checks and others with large followings would hop into rooms and onto stages and they’d get super frustrated at times with NOT being known. I even heard one of them say something to the effect of… 2/
“This platform (Clubhouse) is ridiculous! I have xx,xxx followers on Twitter,” when someone had the audacity to question his views on what was (and still is) a hotly debated topic in the economy.
This person was defined by their followers as a way to validate their views. 3/