1. Out of 44,000 clinical trial participants, Pfizer only used data from 170 participants to claim 95% efficacy.
2. So how did Pfizer arrive at 95% efficacy?

Of the 170 participants, ALL tested positive for Covid, but:
—162 received a Placebo
— 8 received 2 doses of mRNA

Divide 162/170 = 95% efficacy (according to Pfizer) which is how they met the criteria for EUA approval.
3. Out of the 170 participants, a few participants were at the clinical trial sites where Brook Jackson was a Clinical Trial Director. Brook has been a whistleblower since 2020 and is suing Pfizer on behalf of the American people for the egregious & pervasive fraud she witnessed.
4. One example of the fraud she witnessed is Pfizer requested that the death of a placebo participant be changed to say he died of Covid Pneumonia instead of just Pneumonia, despite testing negative for Covid. Which would have helped them skew their efficacy numbers.
5. The list of egregious fraud she witnessed is so long, it’s truly unbelievable. She said in all her years of Clinical Trial research she had never witnessed anything like it.
6. In fact, an editor of The British Medical Journal was so alarmed, he hired an investigative team to look into her claims and they published a peer reviewed paper substantiating the fraud that occurred. bmj.com/content/375/bm…
7. If you don’t know about the biggest whistleblower case in the world, in history, watch this:
8. You can also read more about @IamBrookJackson and her case, along with the latest court documents, here: IAmBrookJackson.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with TexasLindsay™

TexasLindsay™ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TexasLindsay_

Jan 4
1. So how did we get here?
And by here, I mean the bizarre reality of living in a Modern Day Version of The Salem Witch Trials meets The Scarlet Letter…
2. Labels are used to control the masses by smear & fear.

According to ‘The Labeling Theory,’ labels are often used as a form of social control, impacting how humans react to being labeled “different”from themselves.
3.There are 3 types of labels:
—Self-Defining: you choose what label you want
—Ascribed: usually comes from outside sources without permission asked
—Achieved: occurs when someone changes their status, often through education, hard work
Read 12 tweets
Jan 1
1. Meet Jeff.

For what it’s worth, Jeff looks like a nice guy. I’m even willing to bet that Jeff wakes up everyday and tries his best to do his job, despite his shortcomings and lack of credentials to do so.
2. You see, Jeff is a “Fact-Checker” for Politifact and gets paid to discredit Covid misinformation. So one might ask what are Jeff’s qualification?

1) Is Jeff a Doctor? No.
2) Is Jeff a Scientist? No.
3) Does he have a PhD? No.
4) Does he have medical experience? No.
3. Jeff is for all intents and purposes a wordsmith. Alongside a profile picture of him as a dog, is a list of his journalistic contributions and associations.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 1
1. My first thought was this guy must live in Sweden… Image
2. But no, he lives in Louisiana and his bio states he’s an “On Air Expert for CNN + MSNBC” Image
3. Maybe he’s just unaware of the data? So I went back to see the exchange and look to see if any was shared with him, only to see this… Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 31, 2022
In Feb. 2022, an OBGYN in Dallas stopped administering the Covid•19 vaccine for pregnant/breastfeeding patients after 2 newborns succumbed to thrombosis soon after their breastfeeding mothers received a booster shot. Not being able to share this story publicly likely cost lives.
Censorship by social media companies and news outlets who abstained from covering potential harms and those injured by the C•19 vaccine was arguably the most egregious error of the pandemic.
In most cases I witnessed first hand, those censored turned out to be right more than they were wrong. And many censored were more credentialed and experienced than the contractors at tech companies—who’s keyboard strokes silenced those who validly tried to sound the alarm.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(