Ben Calusinski Profile picture
Jan 4 13 tweets 4 min read
The 2 Companies that Own the Entire World (Pt 1)

BlackRock and Vanguard have created one of the greatest monopolies in history

They played the system so good that the government cannot even break them up

Here’s how they did it 👇
First, you need a basic understanding of 'voting rights'

This is the right of a shareholder of a corporation to vote on matters of corporate policy, including decisions on the makeup of the board of directors, making substantial changes in the corporation's operations, etc...
Unlike the single vote right that individuals commonly possess in democratic governments, the number of votes a shareholder has corresponds to the number of shares they own.

Aka: The power goes to the those who own the most stock
The Reuters Fact Check team wrote an article stating:

"BlackRock and Vanguard do not 'own' all the biggest corporations in the world. They invest trillions of dollars into leading companies on behalf of their clients, who ultimately own the shares."

Who are their clients then?
Let’s take a look at BlackRock $BLK

Wow. They own themselves...
Let’s dig even deeper🤔

The majority of the companies listed under “Top Institutional Holders” are also owned by BlackRock and Vanguard

Everything around you is linked to these 2 companies

BlackRock and Vanguard own Big Pharma, via Pfizer $PFE, Johnson & Johnson $JNJ, $UNH...
They own the food you consume, via companies such as Pepsi $PEP

Pepsi owns Lay's, Quaker, Gatorade, 7UP, Doritos, Cheetos Ruffles Etc…
They own the media, via Warner Bros $WBD

(Therefore they own CNN)
They own the energy sector —> Exxon Mobile $XOM
They own the largest company in the world and tech sector $AAPL
They also own the largest US bank $JPM
If there is a certain agenda they want to push, they can prohibit opposition through their voting power

Because they own a substantial share of all the major companies in the US, it is in each company's fiduciary duty to make decisions in the shareholder's best interest (Them)
The obvious reaction is: “Well if they are so powerful, then why hasn’t the government broken them up?”

They can’t

The government relies on both of these companies to prop up the entire economic system

And that is what I will explain in-depth tomorrow. See you then.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben Calusinski

Ben Calusinski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BCalusinski

Jul 21, 2022
Retail has a sour taste for Dark Pools - Let's analyze it from the big firm's perspective (Thread)

Here are 2 reasons institutions have access to ATS's, aka Dark Pools, beyond hiding orders from retail 🔮
First, the original purposes of Dark Pool exchanges were to make it easier for institutions to not have as much of an immediate affect on the market & escape algos

Example: If $GS wanted to buy 25M shares of $AAPL at once, there would be a sizable disturbance in the market
With Dark Pools, $GS can buy those shares from another firm/collection of firms that act as liquidity, via dark pool exchanges, without having a large effect on the market

Fun fact: The main ATS for $GS is called SIGMA X
Read 9 tweets
Jul 19, 2022
Volume does not matter on the indices/ETF's (Thread)

If we agree that the market is manipulated to an extent, a big firm can artificially inflate the volume level shown in any candle, 15m hour, daily, etc...
Big money can exchange shares with themselves instantly across various exchanges. So, if there are MM algos programmed to trap people (which I believe is the case, since it's in their best interest to collect the spread of premium on contracts),then they can create fake breakouts
These breakouts can show lots of volume. They then fade those breakouts after baiting people in.

This occurs more often on the daily candle, instead of intraday. (Remember we are talking about ETF's like $SPY - Not individual tickers)
Read 6 tweets
Feb 18, 2022
BIG NEWS (Read below)👀

I created a $SPY volatility algo that, during its beta testing, has generated all of twitter my call-outs in the past 3 months. So yes, all of those 300%, 400%, 500% trades were a direct result of my algo.

And now, I plan to share it (Read thread) 👇
2/5 The usability of this algo is extremely complex and will be worthless to the average retail trader if used alone.

The precision of levels and timing was fine-tuned by countless hours of screen time and backtesting.

However, I can guide users in the correct direction
3/5 The use-cases of this algo are highly malleable, so not only can it predict high probably bounce levels (with very small risk ranges), it also can provide $SPY 'chop' ranges to scalp between.

When these ranges are broken, long setups emerge
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(