🧵
The highest achievement in science is understanding phenomena and correctly predicting future outcomes.
I predicted and warned about COVID vaccine inducing IgG4 antibodies.
I predicted and warned Protein Sciences Corporation that their Flublok vaccine will cause the development of allergy and allergic reactions to the flu virus proteins in the vaccine itself.
"Scientists" whose job it was to understand and PREVENT these problems, FAILED SPECTACULARLY.
Now they attempt to cover up their failures & distract by accusing us of being "anti-science killers". @peterhotez@mebottazzi@CaulfieldTim@gidmk@gorskon@WHO
I predict @peterHotez' yeast protein contaminated #Corbevax will cause IgE mediated sensitization to yeast proteins. As people cannot avoid exposure to yeast, they will subsequently develop IgG4 related diseases (IgG4-RD). I challenge their safety claims.
/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Immunology notes from the University of California, Irvine, School of Medicine describe that injecting a protein, OVA (egg protein ovalbumin) in this case, will cause the development of IgE antibodies that recognize and bind to OVA.
🧵
Long before EUA, FDA and vaccine makers were warned about induction of inappropriate IgE and IgG4 antibodies by COVID vaccines. They ignored it. Prediction comes true, with devastating consequences. vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/long-before-…
As described in my article, one can expect numerous eosinophilic disorders cause by IgG4. One of my substack readers SL, provided numerous examples: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
@KatieSharff Sorry to learn about your Mom's cancer on @Sensible__Med. As you know, the best cancer defense is your own immune system. Chemo/radiation destroy your immune system. So that's the last thing you need. Ivermectin seems to help against many cancers. 1/
@SCOTTeHENSLEY "Please note, I have tried for over a decade to study vaccine risks in pregnant mothers and infants with concerns about neurodevelopmental risks. 1/
There are known and suspected risks, but the overwhelming dogma is that being critical of vaccines will damage the public benefit of vaccines. 2/
It makes for poor funding and science, as one needs to quantitate these risks to make such a judgement, and most researchers are not willing to potentially bite the hands that feed them/us: FDA, CDC, NIH, NIMH, etc." - Asst. Professor, top Texas medical school, via email to me.3/